| Literature DB >> 25407792 |
Antonio Ceriello1, Katherine Esposito2, Lucia La Sala3, Gemma Pujadas4, Valeria De Nigris5, Roberto Testa6, Loredana Bucciarelli7, Maurizio Rondinelli8, Stefano Genovese9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In type 2 diabetes, acute hyperglycemia worsens endothelial function and inflammation,while resistance to GLP-1 action occurs. All these phenomena seem to be related to the generation of oxidative stress. A Mediterranean diet, supplemented with olive oil, increases plasma antioxidant capacity, suggesting that its implementation can have a favorable effect on the aforementioned phenomena. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that a Mediterranean diet using olive oil can counteract the effects of acute hyperglycemia and can improve the resistance of the endothelium to GLP-1 action.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25407792 PMCID: PMC4240857 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-014-0140-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Baseline characteristics of type 2 diabetic patients and the effects of one month following a Mediterranean diet using olive oil, or following a control low-fat diet
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 9M 3F | 9M 3F | 8M 4F | 8M 4F |
| BMI Kg/m2 | 29.8 ± 1.4 | 29.6 ± 1.3 | 29.2 ± 1.1 | 29.3 ± 1.1 |
| HbA1c % | 8.1 ± 0.5 | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 8.0 ± 0.6 |
| HbA1c mmol/mol | 65 ± 3.2 | 65 ± 3.0 | 65 ± 3.0 | 65 ± 3.3 |
| Resting diastolic blood pressure mm Hg | 77.4 ± 1.1 | 78.6 ± 1.3 | 78.6 ± 1.2 | 77.9 ± 1.4 |
| Resting systolic blood pressure mm Hg | 116.2 ± 1.3 | 115.5 ± 1.2 | 117.1 ± 1.4 | 116.7 ± 1.5 |
| Total cholesterol mmol/l | 4.30 ± 0.3 | 4.30 ± 0.4 | 4.27 ± 0.4 | 4.28 ± 0.3 |
| Triglycerides mmol/l | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.5 |
| HDL-C mmol/l | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
| LDL-C mmol/l | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.5 |
| FMD % | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 7.9 ± 0.4* | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 5.6 ± 0.6 |
| 8-iso-PGF2a (pg/ml) | 68.4 ± 3.5 | 41.3 ± 2.2* | 69.4 ± 3.0 | 68.8 ± 4.1 |
| Nitrotyrosine μmol/l | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.02* | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.06 |
| ICAM-1a (ng/ml) | 170.4 ± 11.5 | 110.5 ± 10.1* | 172.4 ± 10.5 | 173.3 ± 12.4 |
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 230.35 ± 9.4 | 170.20 ± 8.3* | 228.30 ± 10.3 | 235.55 ± 10.2 |
| FRAP (μmol/l) | 903.2 ± 57.2 | 1,810.3 ± 45.4* | 911.6 ± 55.5 | 913.6 ± 52.4 |
| TRAP (μmol/l) | 807.5 ± 87.4 | 1,508.2 ± 60.1* | 810.3 ± 75.2 | 813.3 ± 77.8 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SE *p < 0.05 vs baseline.
Figure 1Glycemia, GLP-1, FMD, nitrotyrosine, 8-iso-PGF2a, insulin, IL-6 and ICAM-1 changes during: baseline hyperglycemic clamp (white triangle); Baseline hyperglycemic clamp + GLP-1 (white square); Hyperglycemic clamp after MedDiet intervention (black triangle); Hyperglycemic clamp + GLP-1 after MedDiet intervention (black square). Data are mean ± SE. £ p < 0.05 vs basal. *p < 0.01 vs basal. §p < 0.01 vs hyperglycemic clamp.
Figure 2Glycemia, GLP-1, FMD, nitrotyrosine, 8-iso-PGF2a, insulin, IL-6 and ICAM-1 changes during: baseline hyperglycemic clamp (white triangle); Baseline hyperglycemic clamp + GLP-1 (white square); Hyperglycemic clamp after Control diet intervention (black triangle); Hyperglycemic clamp + GLP-1 after Control diet intervention (black square). Data are mean ± SE. £ p < 0.05 vs basal. *p < 0.01 vs basal. §p < 0.01 vs hyperglycemic clamp.
Figure 3Δ changes between baseline and after diet intervention. A: Comparison between the Δ of the changes in FMD, nitrotyrosine, 8-iso-PGF2a, insulin, IL-6 and ICAM- during baseline hyperglycemic clamp (grey column) and hyperglycemic clamp after MedDiet intervention (black column). B: Comparison between the Δ of the changes in FMD, nitrotyrosine, 8-iso-PGF2a, insulin, IL-6 and ICAM- during baseline hyperglycemic clamp + GLP-1 (grey column) and hyperglycemic clamp + GLP-1 after MedDiet intervention (black column). *p < 0.01.