| Literature DB >> 30949299 |
Xiao-Cang Ren1, Yue-E Liu1, Jing Li1, Qiang Lin2.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. It has the highest incidence and mortality rate of all cancers worldwide. Late diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very common in clinical practice, and most patients miss the chance for radical surgery. Thus, radiotherapy plays an indispensable role in the treatment of NSCLC. Radiotherapy technology has evolved from the classic two-dimensional approach to three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. However, how to ensure delivery of an accurate dose to the tumor while minimizing the irradiation of normal tissues remains a huge challenge for radiation oncologists, especially due to the positioning error between fractions and the autonomous movement of organs. In recent years, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has greatly increased the accuracy of tumor irradiation while reducing the irradiation dose delivered to healthy tissues and organs. This paper presents a brief review of the definition of IGRT and the various technologies and applications of IGRT. IGRT can help ensure accurate dosing of the target area and reduce radiation damage to the surrounding normal tissue. IGRT may increase the local control rate of tumors and reduce the incidence of radio-therapeutic complications.Entities:
Keywords: Image-guided radiotherapy; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Non-small cell lung cancer; Positioning error; Radiotherapy
Year: 2019 PMID: 30949299 PMCID: PMC6441935 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v11.i3.46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Radiol ISSN: 1949-8470
Figure 1Images of computed tomography. A: The placement of cone beam computed tomography; B: Chest image fusion; C: Pelvic image fusion; D: Radiotherapy after correction with image-guided radiotherapy.
Summary of important data of advantage of image-guided radiotherapy in radiotherapy
| [ | 2003 | Remouchamps et al | The use of mDIBH reduced the mean percentage of both lungs receiving more than 20 Gy from 20.4% to 15.2% ( |
| [ | 2015 | Muralidhar et al | The mean difference of right lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy of the dose was from 1% to -98 % (IGRT < 0.24556) |
| [ | 2003 | Hof et al | In the craniocaudal direction the mean tumor movement was 5.1 mm , in the ventrodorsal direction 3.1 mm, and in the lateraldirection 2.6 mm |
| [ | 2017 | Tan et al | The errors of image-guided registration using 4D-CBCT and 3D-CBCT on the X, Y, Z axes, and 3D space were 0.80 ± 0.21 mm and 1.08 ± 0.25 mm, 2.02 ± 0.46 mm and 3.30 ± 0.53 mm, 0.52 ± 0.16 mm and 0.85 ± 0.24 mm, and 2.25 ± 0.44 mm and 3.59 ± 0.48 mm (all |
| [ | 2017 | Ehrbar et al | Compared with the 4D dose calculations, the mid-ventilation and single-phase tracking overestimated the target mean dose (2.3% and 1.3%), respectively |
| [ | 2016 | Garibaldi | The PTV margins used to compensate for residual tumor localization errors were 3.1, 3.5 and 3.3 mm in the LR, SI and AP directions, respectively |
| [ | 2016 | Wang et al | Position errors after correction in Left–right, Anterior–posterior and Cranial–caudal were 0.22 cm, 0.16 cm and 0.19 cm, respectively |
| [ | 2016 | Ariyaratne et al | Under the use of IGRT, the population mean setup error was 0.01 cm (left–right), 0.05 cm (supero-inferior) and 0.13 cm (antero-posterior) |
mDIBH: Moderate deep inspiration breath hold; IGRT: Image-guided radiotherapy; PTV: Planned target volume.