Khaled Elsayad1, Jan Kriz1, Gabriele Reinartz1, Sergiu Scobioala1, Iris Ernst1, Uwe Haverkamp1, Hans Theodor Eich2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. Hans.eich@ukmuenster.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated an increase in the necessity of adaptive planning over the course of lung cancer radiation therapy (RT) treatment. In this study, we evaluated intrathoracic changes detected by cone-beam CT (CBCT) in lung cancer patients during RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 71 lung cancer patients treated with fractionated CBCT-guided RT were evaluated. Intrathoracic changes and plan adaptation priority (AP) scores were compared between small cell lung cancer (SCLC, n = 13) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 58) patients. RESULTS: The median cumulative radiation dose administered was 54 Gy (range 30-72 Gy) and the median fraction dose was 1.8 Gy (range 1.8-3.0 Gy). All patients were subjected to a CBCT scan at least weekly (range 1-5/week). We observed intrathoracic changes in 83 % of the patients over the course of RT [58 % (41/71) regression, 17 % (12/71) progression, 20 % (14/71) atelectasis, 25 % (18/71) pleural effusion, 13 % (9/71) infiltrative changes, and 10 % (7/71) anatomical shift]. Nearly half, 45 % (32/71), of the patients had one intrathoracic soft tissue change, 22.5 % (16/71) had two, and three or more changes were observed in 15.5 % (11/71) of the patients. Plan modifications were performed in 60 % (43/71) of the patients. Visual volume reduction did correlate with the number of CBCT scans acquired (r = 0.313, p = 0.046) and with the timing of chemotherapy administration (r = 0.385, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Weekly CBCT monitoring provides an adaptation advantage in patients with lung cancer. In this study, the monitoring allowed for plan adaptations due to tumor volume changes and to other anatomical changes.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated an increase in the necessity of adaptive planning over the course of lung cancer radiation therapy (RT) treatment. In this study, we evaluated intrathoracic changes detected by cone-beam CT (CBCT) in lung cancerpatients during RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 71 lung cancerpatients treated with fractionated CBCT-guided RT were evaluated. Intrathoracic changes and plan adaptation priority (AP) scores were compared between small cell lung cancer (SCLC, n = 13) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 58) patients. RESULTS: The median cumulative radiation dose administered was 54 Gy (range 30-72 Gy) and the median fraction dose was 1.8 Gy (range 1.8-3.0 Gy). All patients were subjected to a CBCT scan at least weekly (range 1-5/week). We observed intrathoracic changes in 83 % of the patients over the course of RT [58 % (41/71) regression, 17 % (12/71) progression, 20 % (14/71) atelectasis, 25 % (18/71) pleural effusion, 13 % (9/71) infiltrative changes, and 10 % (7/71) anatomical shift]. Nearly half, 45 % (32/71), of the patients had one intrathoracic soft tissue change, 22.5 % (16/71) had two, and three or more changes were observed in 15.5 % (11/71) of the patients. Plan modifications were performed in 60 % (43/71) of the patients. Visual volume reduction did correlate with the number of CBCT scans acquired (r = 0.313, p = 0.046) and with the timing of chemotherapy administration (r = 0.385, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Weekly CBCT monitoring provides an adaptation advantage in patients with lung cancer. In this study, the monitoring allowed for plan adaptations due to tumor volume changes and to other anatomical changes.
Authors: Jana Fox; Eric Ford; Kristin Redmond; Jessica Zhou; John Wong; Danny Y Song Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Geert Bosmans; Angela van Baardwijk; André Dekker; Michel Ollers; Liesbeth Boersma; André Minken; Philippe Lambin; Dirk De Ruysscher Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: George Rodrigues; Hak Choy; Jeffrey Bradley; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Jeffrey Bogart; Walter J Curran; Elizabeth Gore; Corey Langer; Alexander V Louie; Stephen Lutz; Mitchell Machtay; Varun Puri; Maria Werner-Wasik; Gregory M M Videtic Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2015 May-Jun
Authors: Tae Ryool Koo; Sung Ho Moon; Yu Jin Lim; Ja Young Kim; Yeonjoo Kim; Tae Hyun Kim; Kwan Ho Cho; Ji-Youn Han; Young Joo Lee; Tak Yun; Heung Tae Kim; Jin Soo Lee Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-12-13 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Lukas Käsmann; Maximilian Niyazi; Oliver Blanck; Christian Baues; René Baumann; Sophie Dobiasch; Chukwuka Eze; Daniel Fleischmann; Tobias Gauer; Frank A Giordano; Yvonne Goy; Jan Hausmann; Christoph Henkenberens; David Kaul; Lisa Klook; David Krug; Matthias Mäurer; Cédric M Panje; Johannes Rosenbrock; Lisa Sautter; Daniela Schmitt; Christoph Süß; Alexander H Thieme; Maike Trommer-Nestler; Sonia Ziegler; Nadja Ebert; Daniel Medenwald; Christian Ostheimer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 3.621