Literature DB >> 30908194

Standardized Assessment of Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities and Results of the WMH Segmentation Challenge.

Hugo J Kuijf, J Matthijs Biesbroek, Jeroen De Bresser, Rutger Heinen, Simon Andermatt, Mariana Bento, Matt Berseth, Mikhail Belyaev, M Jorge Cardoso, Adria Casamitjana, D Louis Collins, Mahsa Dadar, Achilleas Georgiou, Mohsen Ghafoorian, Dakai Jin, April Khademi, Jesse Knight, Hongwei Li, Xavier Llado, Miguel Luna, Qaiser Mahmood, Richard McKinley, Alireza Mehrtash, Sebastien Ourselin, Bo-Yong Park, Hyunjin Park, Sang Hyun Park, Simon Pezold, Elodie Puybareau, Leticia Rittner, Carole H Sudre, Sergi Valverde, Veronica Vilaplana, Roland Wiest, Yongchao Xu, Ziyue Xu, Guodong Zeng, Jianguo Zhang, Guoyan Zheng, Christopher Chen, Wiesje van der Flier, Frederik Barkhof, Max A Viergever, Geert Jan Biessels.   

Abstract

Quantification of cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin is of key importance in many neurological research studies. Currently, measurements are often still obtained from manual segmentations on brain MR images, which is a laborious procedure. The automatic WMH segmentation methods exist, but a standardized comparison of the performance of such methods is lacking. We organized a scientific challenge, in which developers could evaluate their methods on a standardized multi-center/-scanner image dataset, giving an objective comparison: the WMH Segmentation Challenge. Sixty T1 + FLAIR images from three MR scanners were released with the manual WMH segmentations for training. A test set of 110 images from five MR scanners was used for evaluation. The segmentation methods had to be containerized and submitted to the challenge organizers. Five evaluation metrics were used to rank the methods: 1) Dice similarity coefficient; 2) modified Hausdorff distance (95th percentile); 3) absolute log-transformed volume difference; 4) sensitivity for detecting individual lesions; and 5) F1-score for individual lesions. In addition, the methods were ranked on their inter-scanner robustness; 20 participants submitted their methods for evaluation. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the results. In brief, there is a cluster of four methods that rank significantly better than the other methods, with one clear winner. The inter-scanner robustness ranking shows that not all the methods generalize to unseen scanners. The challenge remains open for future submissions and provides a public platform for method evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30908194      PMCID: PMC7590957          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2905770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  31 in total

1.  Bayesian model selection for pathological neuroimaging data applied to white matter lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Carole H Sudre; M Jorge Cardoso; Willem H Bouvy; Geert Jan Biessels; Josephine Barnes; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved.

Authors:  B L WELCH
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1947       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Keelin Murphy; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Fully convolutional network ensembles for white matter hyperintensities segmentation in MR images.

Authors:  Hongwei Li; Gongfa Jiang; Jianguo Zhang; Ruixuan Wang; Zhaolei Wang; Wei-Shi Zheng; Bjoern Menze
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  White matter hyperintensities, cognitive impairment and dementia: an update.

Authors:  Niels D Prins; Philip Scheltens
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges.

Authors:  Leonardo Pantoni
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  An evaluation of automatic coronary artery calcium scoring methods with cardiac CT using the orCaScore framework.

Authors:  Jelmer M Wolterink; Tim Leiner; Bob D de Vos; Jean-Louis Coatrieux; B Michael Kelm; Satoshi Kondo; Rodrigo A Salgado; Rahil Shahzad; Huazhong Shu; Miranda Snoeren; Richard A P Takx; Lucas J van Vliet; Theo van Walsum; Tineke P Willems; Guanyu Yang; Yefeng Zheng; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Automatic Detection of White Matter Hyperintensities in Healthy Aging and Pathology Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Caligiuri; Paolo Perrotta; Antonio Augimeri; Federico Rocca; Aldo Quattrone; Andrea Cherubini
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-07

9.  Vascular Cognitive Impairment in a Memory Clinic Population: Rationale and Design of the "Utrecht-Amsterdam Clinical Features and Prognosis in Vascular Cognitive Impairment" (TRACE-VCI) Study.

Authors:  Jooske Marije Funke Boomsma; Lieza Geertje Exalto; Frederik Barkhof; Esther van den Berg; Jeroen de Bresser; Rutger Heinen; Huiberdina Lena Koek; Niels Daniël Prins; Philip Scheltens; Henry Chanoch Weinstein; Wiesje Maria van der Flier; Geert Jan Biessels
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-04-19

Review 10.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  38 in total

1.  Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging.

Authors:  M T Duong; J D Rudie; J Wang; L Xie; S Mohan; J C Gee; A M Rauschecker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Liver segmentation and metastases detection in MR images using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Mariëlle J A Jansen; Hugo J Kuijf; Maarten Niekel; Wouter B Veldhuis; Frank J Wessels; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-15

3.  ROBUST WHITE MATTER HYPERINTENSITY SEGMENTATION ON UNSEEN DOMAIN.

Authors:  Xingchen Zhao; Anthony Sicilia; Davneet S Minhas; Erin E O'Connor; Howard J Aizenstein; William E Klunk; Dana L Tudorascu; Seong Jae Hwang
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2021-05-25

4.  Tau-Atrophy Variability Reveals Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Sandhitsu R Das; Xueying Lyu; Michael Tran Duong; Long Xie; Lauren McCollum; Robin de Flores; Michael DiCalogero; David J Irwin; Bradford C Dickerson; Ilya M Nasrallah; Paul A Yushkevich; David A Wolk
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Learning joint segmentation of tissues and brain lesions from task-specific hetero-modal domain-shifted datasets.

Authors:  Reuben Dorent; Thomas Booth; Wenqi Li; Carole H Sudre; Sina Kafiabadi; Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Alireza Mehrtash; William M Wells; Clare M Tempany; Purang Abolmaesumi; Tina Kapur
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Open-Source Automatic Segmentation of Ocular Structures and Biomarkers of Microbial Keratitis on Slit-Lamp Photography Images Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Jessica Loo; Matthias F Kriegel; Megan M Tuohy; Kyeong Hwan Kim; Venkatesh Prajna; Maria A Woodward; Sina Farsiu
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.772

8.  White matter hyperintensities induce distal deficits in the connected fibers.

Authors:  Yanpeng Liu; Yiwei Xia; Xiaoxiao Wang; Yanming Wang; Du Zhang; Benedictor Alexander Nguchu; Jiajie He; Yi Wang; Lumeng Yang; Yiqing Wang; Yunqing Ying; Xiaoniu Liang; Qianhua Zhao; Jianjun Wu; Zonghui Liang; Ding Ding; Qiang Dong; Bensheng Qiu; Xin Cheng; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Multi-domain Adaptation in Brain MRI Through Paired Consistency and Adversarial Learning.

Authors:  Mauricio Orbes-Arteaga; Thomas Varsavsky; Carole H Sudre; Zach Eaton-Rosen; Lewis J Haddow; Lauge Sørensen; Mads Nielsen; Akshay Pai; Sébastien Ourselin; Marc Modat; Parashkev Nachev; M Jorge Cardoso
Journal:  Domain Adapt Represent Transf Med Image Learn Less Labels Imperfect Data (2019)       Date:  2019-10-13

10.  Modeling Healthy Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI.

Authors:  Christoph Baur; Benedikt Wiestler; Mark Muehlau; Claus Zimmer; Nassir Navab; Shadi Albarqouni
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.