Literature DB >> 34136814

Modeling Healthy Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI.

Christoph Baur1, Benedikt Wiestler1, Mark Muehlau1, Claus Zimmer1, Nassir Navab1, Shadi Albarqouni1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an unsupervised deep learning model on MR images of normal brain anatomy to automatically detect deviations indicative of pathologic states on abnormal MR images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, spatial autoencoders with skip-connections (which can learn to compress and reconstruct data) were leveraged to learn the normal variability of the brain from MR scans of healthy individuals. A total of 100 normal, in-house MR scans were used for training. Subsequently, as the model was unable to reconstruct anomalies well, this characteristic was exploited for detecting and delineating various diseases by computing the difference between the input data and their reconstruction. The unsupervised model was compared with a supervised U-Net- and threshold-based classifier trained on data from 50 patients with multiple sclerosis (in-house dataset) and 50 patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive. Both the unsupervised and supervised U-Net models were tested on five different datasets containing MR images of microangiopathy, glioblastoma, and multiple sclerosis. Precision-recall statistics and derivations thereof (mean area under the precision-recall curve, Dice score) were used to quantify lesion detection and segmentation performance.
RESULTS: The unsupervised approach outperformed the naive thresholding approach in lesion detection (mean F1 scores ranging from 17% to 62% vs 6.4% to 15% across the five different datasets) and performed similarly to the supervised U-Net (20%-64%) across a variety of pathologic conditions. This outperformance was mostly driven by improved precision compared with the thresholding approach (mean precisions, 15%-59% vs 3.4%-10%). The model was also developed to create an anomaly heatmap display.
CONCLUSION: The unsupervised deep learning model was able to automatically detect anomalies on brain MR images with high performance. Supplemental material is available for this article. Keywords: Brain/Brain Stem Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Experimental Investigations, Head/Neck, MR-Imaging, Quantification, Segmentation, Stacked Auto-Encoders, Technology Assessment, Tissue Characterization © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34136814      PMCID: PMC8204131          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021190169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  10 in total

1.  Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Cheng-Yi Liu; Paul M Thompson; Zhuowen Tu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MR images: A comparative study.

Authors:  Christoph Baur; Stefan Denner; Benedikt Wiestler; Nassir Navab; Shadi Albarqouni
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction.

Authors:  Michael A Bruno; Eric A Walker; Hani H Abujudeh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Paul Schmidt; Christian Gaser; Milan Arsic; Dorothea Buck; Annette Förschler; Achim Berthele; Muna Hoshi; Rüdiger Ilg; Volker J Schmid; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Hemmer; Mark Mühlau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sasank Chilamkurthy; Rohit Ghosh; Swetha Tanamala; Mustafa Biviji; Norbert G Campeau; Vasantha Kumar Venugopal; Vidur Mahajan; Pooja Rao; Prashant Warier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features.

Authors:  Spyridon Bakas; Hamed Akbari; Aristeidis Sotiras; Michel Bilello; Martin Rozycki; Justin S Kirby; John B Freymann; Keyvan Farahani; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.444

7.  Standardized Assessment of Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities and Results of the WMH Segmentation Challenge.

Authors:  Hugo J Kuijf; J Matthijs Biesbroek; Jeroen De Bresser; Rutger Heinen; Simon Andermatt; Mariana Bento; Matt Berseth; Mikhail Belyaev; M Jorge Cardoso; Adria Casamitjana; D Louis Collins; Mahsa Dadar; Achilleas Georgiou; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Dakai Jin; April Khademi; Jesse Knight; Hongwei Li; Xavier Llado; Miguel Luna; Qaiser Mahmood; Richard McKinley; Alireza Mehrtash; Sebastien Ourselin; Bo-Yong Park; Hyunjin Park; Sang Hyun Park; Simon Pezold; Elodie Puybareau; Leticia Rittner; Carole H Sudre; Sergi Valverde; Veronica Vilaplana; Roland Wiest; Yongchao Xu; Ziyue Xu; Guodong Zeng; Jianguo Zhang; Guoyan Zheng; Christopher Chen; Wiesje van der Flier; Frederik Barkhof; Max A Viergever; Geert Jan Biessels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Natalie M Zahr; Edith V Sullivan; Adolf Pfefferbaum
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Progressive disease in glioblastoma: Benefits and limitations of semi-automated volumetry.

Authors:  Thomas Huber; Georgina Alber; Stefanie Bette; Johannes Kaesmacher; Tobias Boeckh-Behrens; Jens Gempt; Florian Ringel; Hanno M Specht; Bernhard Meyer; Claus Zimmer; Benedikt Wiestler; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predicting conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis-An imaging-based machine learning approach.

Authors:  Haike Zhang; Esther Alberts; Viola Pongratz; Mark Mühlau; Claus Zimmer; Benedikt Wiestler; Paul Eichinger
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.881

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Anatomy Online Teaching During Covid-19 Pandemic: The Need for Responsive Anatomy Learning Ecosystem.

Authors:  Srijit Das; Mohamed Al Mushaiqri
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.652

Review 2.  Radiomics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence-what the neuroradiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Matthias W Wagner; Khashayar Namdar; Asthik Biswas; Suranna Monah; Farzad Khalvati; Birgit B Ertl-Wagner
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Emergency triage of brain computed tomography via anomaly detection with a deep generative model.

Authors:  Seungjun Lee; Boryeong Jeong; Minjee Kim; Ryoungwoo Jang; Wooyul Paik; Jiseon Kang; Won Jung Chung; Gil-Sun Hong; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 4.  Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kaining Sheng; Cecilie Mørck Offersen; Jon Middleton; Jonathan Frederik Carlsen; Thomas Clement Truelsen; Akshay Pai; Jacob Johansen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.