Literature DB >> 32248131

Open-Source Automatic Segmentation of Ocular Structures and Biomarkers of Microbial Keratitis on Slit-Lamp Photography Images Using Deep Learning.

Jessica Loo, Matthias F Kriegel, Megan M Tuohy, Kyeong Hwan Kim, Venkatesh Prajna, Maria A Woodward, Sina Farsiu.   

Abstract

We propose a fully-automatic deep learning-based algorithm for segmentation of ocular structures and microbial keratitis (MK) biomarkers on slit-lamp photography (SLP) images. The dataset consisted of SLP images from 133 eyes with manual annotations by a physician, P1. A modified region-based convolutional neural network, SLIT-Net, was developed and trained using P1's annotations to identify and segment four pathological regions of interest (ROIs) on diffuse white light images (stromal infiltrate (SI), hypopyon, white blood cell (WBC) border, corneal edema border), one pathological ROI on diffuse blue light images (epithelial defect (ED)), and two non-pathological ROIs on all images (corneal limbus, light reflexes). To assess inter-reader variability, 75 eyes were manually annotated for pathological ROIs by a second physician, P2. Performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Using seven-fold cross-validation, the DSC of the algorithm (as compared to P1) for all ROIs was good (range: 0.62-0.95) on all 133 eyes. For the subset of 75 eyes with manual annotations by P2, the DSC for pathological ROIs ranged from 0.69-0.85 (SLIT-Net) vs. 0.37-0.92 (P2). DSCs for SLIT-Net were not significantly different than P2 for segmenting hypopyons (p > 0.05) and higher than P2 for WBCs (p < 0.001) and edema (p < 0.001). DSCs were higher for P2 for segmenting SIs (p < 0.001) and EDs (p < 0.001). HDs were lower for P2 for segmenting SIs (p = 0.005) and EDs (p < 0.001) and not significantly different for hypopyons (p > 0.05), WBCs (p > 0.05), and edema (p > 0.05). This prototype fully-automatic algorithm to segment MK biomarkers on SLP images performed to expectations on an exploratory dataset and holds promise for quantification of corneal physiology and pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32248131      PMCID: PMC7781042          DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2983549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  56 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors for microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: comparison with Europe and North America.

Authors:  D S C Lam; E Houang; D S P Fan; D Lyon; D Seal; E Wong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Classifying the severity of corneal ulcers by using the "1, 2, 3" rule.

Authors:  Mark C Vital; Marcel Belloso; Thomas C Prager; Jeffrey D Lanier
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Corneal densitometry as an indicator of corneal health.

Authors:  Ahmad Muneer Otri; Usama Fares; Mouhamed A Al-Aqaba; Harminder S Dua
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Bacterial keratitis: a prospective clinical and microbiological study.

Authors:  F Schaefer; O Bruttin; L Zografos; Y Guex-Crosier
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Automated Identification of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Rishab Gargeya; Theodore Leng
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Corneal blindness: a global perspective.

Authors:  J P Whitcher; M Srinivasan; M P Upadhyay
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Open-source, machine and deep learning-based automated algorithm for gestational age estimation through smartphone lens imaging.

Authors:  Arjun D Desai; Chunlei Peng; Leyuan Fang; Dibyendu Mukherjee; Andrew Yeung; Stephanie J Jaffe; Jennifer B Griffin; Sina Farsiu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Risk factors for treatment outcome in fungal keratitis.

Authors:  Prajna Lalitha; Namperumalsamy Venkatesh Prajna; Amit Kabra; Kannan Mahadevan; Muthaiah Srinivasan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Gland segmentation in colon histology images: The glas challenge contest.

Authors:  Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Josien P W Pluim; Hao Chen; Xiaojuan Qi; Pheng-Ann Heng; Yun Bo Guo; Li Yang Wang; Bogdan J Matuszewski; Elia Bruni; Urko Sanchez; Anton Böhm; Olaf Ronneberger; Bassem Ben Cheikh; Daniel Racoceanu; Philipp Kainz; Michael Pfeiffer; Martin Urschler; David R J Snead; Nasir M Rajpoot
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Automatic Corneal Ulcer Segmentation Combining Gaussian Mixture Modeling and Otsu Method.

Authors:  Zhenrong Liu; Yankun Shi; Pengji Zhan; Yue Zhang; Yi Gong; Xiaoying Tang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence and corneal diseases.

Authors:  Linda Kang; Dena Ballouz; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.299

2.  Preventing corneal blindness caused by keratitis using artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Zhongwen Li; Jiewei Jiang; Kuan Chen; Qianqian Chen; Qinxiang Zheng; Xiaotian Liu; Hongfei Weng; Shanjun Wu; Wei Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.