Ji Eun Kim1, Hyun Ok Kim2, Kyungsoo Bae1, Dae Seob Choi1, Dominik Nickel3. 1. Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, 79 Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 52727, Republic of Korea. galleonok@hanmail.net. 3. Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare look-locker inversion recovery (LLIR) and B1 inhomogeneity-corrected variable flip angle T1 mapping methods for estimation of liver function and prediction of hepatic insufficiency and decompensation on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 248 patients with normal liver function, chronic liver disease, or cirrhosis underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging, including T1 mapping at 10-min and 20-min hepatobiliary phase (HBP) by using both methods. T1 relaxation times of the liver (T1Liver-pre, T1Liver-post) and the spleen (T1Spleen) were correlated between two methods. ΔT1Liver ([T1Liver-pre - T1Liver-post]/T1Liver-pre), adjusted T1Liver ([T1Spleen - T1Liver-post]/T1Spleen), and functional liver volume-to-weight ratio (liver volume on volumetric T1 map/[T1Liver-post × patient's weight]) were calculated. The diagnostic performance of T1 parameters and the predictive performance of models (serum marker, serum marker plus T1 parameter) were compared. RESULTS: T1Liver-post showed a strong correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.001) between two methods but was significantly different. For depicting cirrhosis, LLIR-adjusted T1Liver at 10-min HBP showed the highest performance (p < 0.025). For predicting hepatic insufficiency and decompensation, LLIR-adjusted T1Liver (Akaike information criterion (AIC), 58.37; C-index, 0.867) and LLIR-T1Liver-post (AIC, 48.82; C-index, 0.885) at 10-min HBP showed the best performance, respectively, when added to serum albumin level. CONCLUSIONS: T1Liver-post showed a strong correlation between two methods but with significant differences. T1 mapping using LLIR at 10-min HBP with obtainment of adjusted T1Liver and T1Liver-post may be the best approach for estimation of liver function and prediction of hepatic insufficiency and decompensation. KEY POINTS: • T1 Liver-post showed a strong correlation between LLIR and B 1 inhomogeneity-corrected VFA methods, both at 10-min and 20-min HBP but with significant differences. • T1 Liver-post at 10-min and 20-min HBP using LLIR and B 1 inhomogeneity-corrected VFA methods could not be used interchangeably during the follow-up in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or cirrhosis. • T1 mapping using LLIR at 10-min HBP with obtainment of adjusted T1 Liver and T1 Liver-post may be the most suitable method and parameter for estimation of global liver function and prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with CLD or cirrhosis.
OBJECTIVES: To compare look-locker inversion recovery (LLIR) and B1 inhomogeneity-corrected variable flip angle T1 mapping methods for estimation of liver function and prediction of hepatic insufficiency and decompensation on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 248 patients with normal liver function, chronic liver disease, or cirrhosis underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging, including T1 mapping at 10-min and 20-min hepatobiliary phase (HBP) by using both methods. T1 relaxation times of the liver (T1Liver-pre, T1Liver-post) and the spleen (T1Spleen) were correlated between two methods. ΔT1Liver ([T1Liver-pre - T1Liver-post]/T1Liver-pre), adjusted T1Liver ([T1Spleen - T1Liver-post]/T1Spleen), and functional liver volume-to-weight ratio (liver volume on volumetric T1 map/[T1Liver-post × patient's weight]) were calculated. The diagnostic performance of T1 parameters and the predictive performance of models (serum marker, serum marker plus T1 parameter) were compared. RESULTS: T1Liver-post showed a strong correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.001) between two methods but was significantly different. For depicting cirrhosis, LLIR-adjusted T1Liver at 10-min HBP showed the highest performance (p < 0.025). For predicting hepatic insufficiency and decompensation, LLIR-adjusted T1Liver (Akaike information criterion (AIC), 58.37; C-index, 0.867) and LLIR-T1Liver-post (AIC, 48.82; C-index, 0.885) at 10-min HBP showed the best performance, respectively, when added to serum albumin level. CONCLUSIONS: T1Liver-post showed a strong correlation between two methods but with significant differences. T1 mapping using LLIR at 10-min HBP with obtainment of adjusted T1Liver and T1Liver-post may be the best approach for estimation of liver function and prediction of hepatic insufficiency and decompensation. KEY POINTS: • T1 Liver-post showed a strong correlation between LLIR and B 1 inhomogeneity-corrected VFA methods, both at 10-min and 20-min HBP but with significant differences. • T1 Liver-post at 10-min and 20-min HBP using LLIR and B 1 inhomogeneity-corrected VFA methods could not be used interchangeably during the follow-up in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or cirrhosis. • T1 mapping using LLIR at 10-min HBP with obtainment of adjusted T1 Liver and T1 Liver-post may be the most suitable method and parameter for estimation of global liver function and prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with CLD or cirrhosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cirrhosis; Gadoxetic acid; Liver; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Nikola Stikov; Mathieu Boudreau; Ives R Levesque; Christine L Tardif; Joëlle K Barral; G Bruce Pike Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: E Hinoshita; K Taguchi; A Inokuchi; T Uchiumi; N Kinukawa; M Shimada; M Tsuneyoshi; K Sugimachi; M Kuwano Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Nina Bastati; Andreas Wibmer; Romana Fragner; Jacqueline C Hodge; Michael Trauner; Christian J Herold; Mustafa R Bashir; Bernard E Van Beers Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ruo Fan Sheng; He Qing Wang; Li Yang; Kai Pu Jin; Yan Hong Xie; Cai Xia Fu; Meng Su Zeng Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: Ute Lina Fahlenkamp; Katharina Ziegeler; Lisa Christine Adams; Sarah Maria Böker; Günther Engel; Marcus Richard Makowski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yeon Jin Cho; Woo Sun Kim; Young Hun Choi; Seul Bi Lee; SeungHyun Lee; Jung-Eun Cheon; MunYoung Paek; SeungTae Woo Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Moritz T Winkelmann; Georg Gohla; Jens Kübler; Jakob Weiß; Stephan Clasen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Rüdiger Hoffmann Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Ute Lina Fahlenkamp; Katharina Ziegeler; Lisa Christine Adams; Sarah Maria Böker; Günther Engel; Marcus Richard Makowski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 4.379