OBJECTIVES: To compare the potential of T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing liver function in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with known HBV-related HCCs were included. T1 relaxation time and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the liver were measured, and the reduction rate of T1 relaxation time (∆%) was calculated. T1 relaxation time measurements were compared with ADC values according to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. RESULTS: Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and ∆% of T1 relaxation time measurements showed significant correlations with MELD score (rho = 0.571, p < 0.0001; rho = -0.573, p < 0.0001, respectively). HBP and ∆% of T1 relaxation time were significantly different between good (MELD ≤8) and poor liver function (MELD ≥9) (p < 0.0001 for both). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of T1 relaxation time for HBP (AUC 0.84) and ∆% (AUC 0.82) were significantly better than for ADC (AUC 0.53; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI showed promise for evaluating liver function in patients with HBV-related HCC, while DWI was not reliable. HBP T1 relaxation time measurement was equally accurate as ∆% measurement. KEY POINTS: • T 1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was accurate for assessing liver function. • HBP T 1 relaxation time measurement was as accurate as ∆% T 1 • T 1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was more accurate than DWI-ADC measurement.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the potential of T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing liver function in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with known HBV-related HCCs were included. T1 relaxation time and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the liver were measured, and the reduction rate of T1 relaxation time (∆%) was calculated. T1 relaxation time measurements were compared with ADC values according to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. RESULTS: Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and ∆% of T1 relaxation time measurements showed significant correlations with MELD score (rho = 0.571, p < 0.0001; rho = -0.573, p < 0.0001, respectively). HBP and ∆% of T1 relaxation time were significantly different between good (MELD ≤8) and poor liver function (MELD ≥9) (p < 0.0001 for both). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of T1 relaxation time for HBP (AUC 0.84) and ∆% (AUC 0.82) were significantly better than for ADC (AUC 0.53; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI showed promise for evaluating liver function in patients with HBV-related HCC, while DWI was not reliable. HBP T1 relaxation time measurement was equally accurate as ∆% measurement. KEY POINTS: • T 1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was accurate for assessing liver function. • HBP T 1 relaxation time measurement was as accurate as ∆% T 1 • T 1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was more accurate than DWI-ADC measurement.
Authors: Alexander Zipprich; Oliver Kuss; Sebastian Rogowski; Gerhard Kleber; Erich Lotterer; Thomas Seufferlein; Wolfgang E Fleig; Matthias M Dollinger Journal: Gut Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Michael Haimerl; Niklas Verloh; Florian Zeman; Claudia Fellner; René Müller-Wille; Andreas G Schreyer; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Simon Matoori; Johannes M Froehlich; Stefan Breitenstein; Aleksis Doert; Viktoria Pozdniakova; Dow-Mu Koh; Andreas Gutzeit Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christina Schraml; Sascha Kaufmann; Hansjoerg Rempp; Roland Syha; Dominik Ketelsen; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Konstantin Nikolaou Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2015-11-27