| Literature DB >> 30875994 |
Yuling Dong1,2, Hao Sun3, Weichao Yang4, Shuang Ma5,6, Beibei Du7,8, Hui Xu9.
Abstract
Inulin is considered an efficient prebiotic and is beneficial for metabolic diseases via promoting intestinal probiotic enrichment and the metabolites of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). However, the effect of inulin on patients with InR deficiencies has seldom been reported. In this study, the lifespan, related gene expression, and gut microbiota of InRp5545/TM3 (insulin receptor mutant) Drosophila melanogaster under inulin treatment were investigated. The results showed that the lifespan was extended in only males and not in females. Furthermore, distinctly different patterns of gene expression were found between males and females, especially in the insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-like signalling (IIS) and target of rapamycin (TOR) pathways. Additionally, as a link between inulin and lifespan responses, the gut microbiota was distinctly separated by gender in both the standard diet group and the inulin treatment group, and the relationship between lifespan and the gut microbiota community was stronger in male flies than in females. This study provides preliminary evidence for the gender-dependent lifespan responses to inulin in insulin signalling-deficient Drosophila. However, controls such as wild-type and TM3 flies, and more InR mutant strains with different genetic backgrounds need to be further investigated to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the phenomenon.Entities:
Keywords: Drosophila melanogaster; gut microbiota; insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-like signalling (IIS) pathway; inulin; lifespan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30875994 PMCID: PMC6470987 DOI: 10.3390/nu11030636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Lifespan analysis of InRp5545/TM3 D. melanogaster fed an inulin-supplemented diet or a standard diet for male (a) and female (b) flies.
Statistics for survival curves. Cohort sizes, mean and median lifespans, percentage changes, and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests for survival curves in this study.
| Total n. of Flies | Mean (% Change) | Median (% Change) | Log-Rank (vs. Standard Diet) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Standard diet | 196 | 34.91 | 22.08 | - |
| 5% Inulin | 200 | 53.70 (+53.83%) | 60.20 (+172.63%) | |
| 10% Inulin | 198 | 56.42 (+61.62%) | 62.31 (+182.19%) | |
|
| ||||
| Standard diet | 199 | 42.60 | 32.50 | - |
| 5% Inulin | 200 | 40.73 (−4.39%) | 29.85 (−8.15%) | |
| 10% Inulin | 199 | 39.75 (−6.69%) | 33.50 (+3.08%) |
Figure 2Starvation survival curves of InRp5545/TM3 D. melanogaster fed an inulin-supplemented diet or a standard diet for male (a) and female (b) flies.
Statistics for starvation–survival curves. Cohort sizes, mean and median lifespans, percentage changes, and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests for starvation–survival curves in this study.
| Total n. of Flies | Mean (% Change) | Median (% Change) | Log-Rank (vs. Standard Diet) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Standard diet | 156 | 28.79 | 14.33 | - |
| 5% Inulin | 160 | 36.40 (+26.43%) | 13.66 (−4.65%) | |
| 10% Inulin | 137 | 36.81 (+27.87%) | 15.58 (+8.71%) | |
|
| ||||
| Standard diet | 160 | 24.80 | 12.42 | - |
| 5% Inulin | 160 | 29.02 (+16.99%) | 14.28 (+15.00%) | |
| 10% Inulin | 140 | 35.82 (+44.41%) | 17.02 (+37.02%) |
Figure 3Body weight of InRp5545/TM3 D. melanogaster fed an inulin-supplemented diet or a standard diet in male (a) and female (b) flies. Error bars indicate standard errors. p values were calculated by comparing the inulin-fed flies to flies fed a nonsupplemented standard diet. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Effect of inulin on the relative transcript levels of metabolism-, stress-, immune-, and longevity-associated genes. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 5Compositions of gut microbiota for InRp5545/TM3 D. melanogaster fed an inulin-supplemented diet or a standard diet. Bacterial diversity at the phylum level (a) and genus level (b). Bacterial abundance of Acetobacter (c) and Lactobacillus (d).
Alpha index analysis of InRp5545/TM3 D. melanogaster on an inulin-supplemented diet or a standard diet.
| Standard Diet Male | Standard Diet Female | Inulin Male | Inulin Female | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACE | 25.74 ± 0.13 | 25.59 ± 4.68 ( | 29.13 ± 2.74 ( | 31.43 ± 9.24 ( |
| Chao1 | 24.36 ± 0.69 | 24.17 ± 3.97 ( | 33.67 ± 8.18 ( | 25.72 ± 2.44 ( |
| Shannon | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 1.86 ± 0.29 ( | 0.92 ± 0.36 ( | 1.78 ± 0.40 ( |
| Simpson | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.07 ( | 0.28 ± 0.13 ( | 0.57 ± 0.15 ( |
Note: Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3); the p value for the Standard diet Female was the Standard diet Female vs. Standard diet Male; the p value for Inulin Male was the Inulin Male vs. Standard diet Male; the first p value for Inulin Female was the Inulin Female vs. Inulin Male; and the second p value for Inulin Female was the Inulin Female vs. Standard diet Female.
Figure 6Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) (a) principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) score plots (b) based on weighted UniFrac metrics and redundancy analysis (RDA) (c).
Figure 7Cladogram and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores indicating significant differences in gut microbiota in InRp5545/TM3 D. melanogaster fed an inulin-supplemented diet or a standard diet. (a) Cladogram of male flies on the inulin and standard diet; (b) Cladogram of male and female flies on the inulin-supplemented diet; (c) LDA scores of male flies on the inulin and standard diet; (d) LDA scores of male and female flies on the inulin-supplemented diet.