A hypodiboric acid system for the reduction of nitro groups on DNA-chemical conjugates has been developed. This transformation provided good to excellent yields of the reduced amine product for a variety of functionalized aromatic, heterocyclic, and aliphatic nitro compounds. DNA tolerance to reaction conditions, extension to decigram scale reductions, successful use in a DNA-encoded chemical library synthesis, and subsequent target selection are also described.
A hypodiboric acid system for the reduction of nitro groups on DNA-chemical conjugates has been developed. This transformation provided good to excellent yields of the reduced amine product for a variety of functionalized aromatic, heterocyclic, and aliphatic nitro compounds. DNA tolerance to reaction conditions, extension to decigram scale reductions, successful use in a DNA-encoded chemical library synthesis, and subsequent target selection are also described.
DNA-encoded
chemical library (DECL) screens are an economic and
efficient method for hit discovery.[1] Recent
advances in DNA high-throughput sequencing and DNA synthesis have
enabled routine screens of large DECL collections,[2] and successful reports of DECL-based target campaigns have
spurred wide interest in the platform.[1,3] However, solution-phase
synthesis of DECLs is limited by constraints imposed by DNA-integrity
and DNA-solubility concerns.[4] Adaptation
of common chemical reactions to a mild, generally applicable, and
partially aqueous condition is needed to expand the repertoire of
both DNA-compatible chemical transformations[5] as well as available DECL chemical space.[6]Nitro-substituted, bifunctional compounds represent a versatile
set of building blocks for the synthesis of DECLs—as an incorporation
of the nitro functional group for select drug–target classes,[7] as a substituent to facilitate other reactions
under DNA-compatible conditions (e.g., nucleophilic aromatic substitution[8]), but most importantly as a widely commercially
available set of masked, bifunctional anilines that can be unveiled
and screened directly or further functionalized in a subsequent build
cycle. As a routine transformation in drug synthesis, numerous methods[9] have been developed for nitro reduction with
metal reagents, such as iron[10a] or zinc,[10b] as well as nonmetallic reagents, such as sodium
dithionite[10c] and trichlorosilane.[10d] However, in the context of DECL synthesis there
are limited disclosed methods. Satz and co-workers have utilized a
Raney-nickel system,[5a] we have described
a sodium dithionite protocol,[11] and recently,
Ding et al. have developed an iron sulfate condition[12] for use in the on-DNA synthesis of benzimidazoles through
an SNAr, o-amino nitro reduction, and
aldehyde condensation sequence (Figure A). However, to the best of our knowledge, all of these
conditions have only been widely demonstrated in the reduction of o-aminonitroarenes, and our attempts to develop dithionite
as a general reducing agent for nitroarenes was not successful.[13] Seeking a general condition for the synthesis
of nonbenzimidazole DECLs, we initiated studies to develop a mild
and general nitro reduction for application to a wide variety of on-DNA
nitro substrates (Figure , B).
Figure 1
On-DNA nitro reductions: (A) conditions from previous
work using
Raney-Ni, sodium dithionite, or iron sulfate for the reduction of ortho-amino nitroarenes; (B) this work.
On-DNA nitro reductions: (A) conditions from previous
work using
Raney-Ni, sodium dithionite, or iron sulfate for the reduction of ortho-amino nitroarenes; (B) this work.We were intrigued by recent reports which utilized diboron
reagents
for nitro reduction, with bis(pinacolato)diboron in basic, alcoholic
solvent at 110 °C[14a] or hypodiboric
acid in neutral water at 80 °C,[14b] conditions that might be tolerated by DNA. We initiated our studies
on substrate-functionalized “headpiece” DNA commonly
used in DECL synthesis, which features a distal amino group for compound
attachments covalently connected to two complementary DNA strands
via a PEG-type bifurcated linker (our “headpiece” DNA
is 17-bp dsDNA with a 3′ overhang; see the Supporting Information for the full structure). As our DECL
reaction optimization and applications were conducted on nanomole
amounts of DNA at micromolar concentrations, reaction assessments
were conducted by LC–MS.[15] Preliminary
on-DNA nitro reduction experiments utilizing bis(pinacolato)diboron
failed, likely due to aqueous temperature limitations and poor reagent
solubility.However, upon switching to water-soluble hypodiboric
acid,[16] a small amount of 2a was observed
for model nitroarene 1a at ambient temperature in aqueous
alcoholic solvent (Table , entry 1). Encouraged by this result, we began a pH screen
(Table , entries 2–5)
which revealed a clear trend toward enhanced conversions under increasingly
basic conditions. This is consistent with a proposed mechanism for
diboron-mediated nitro reduction, in which reduction is promoted by
coordination of an alkoxide to boron.[14] We next set out to determine cosolvent effects, utilizing several
common, water-miscible organic solvents. Use of acetonitrile, dimethylacetamide,
dimethylformamide, and pure water provided lowered conversion to 2a, and although DMSO provided the aniline in excellent conversion,
high amounts of DMSO may impair isolation of DNA (Table , entries 5–10). Ultimately,
use of aqueous ethanol with B2(OH)4 and NaOH
cleanly provided 2a in >95% conversion after only
2 h
(Table , entry 11).
Table 1
Optimization of Nitro Reduction Conditions
entry
buffer/basea
cosolventb
2ac (%)
1
pH 8.2 borate
MIPOd
11
2
pH 5.5 phosphate
MIPO
<5
3
pH 10.6 borate
MIPO
28
4
pH 12 phosphate
MIPO
26
5
NaOH
MIPO
81
6
NaOH
CH3CN
80
7
NaOH
none
78
8
NaOH
DMAe
68
9
NaOH
DMFf
40
10
NaOH
DMSOg
93
11
NaOH
CH3CH2OH
>95
500 equiv used.
30% (v/v)
cosolvent used.
Conversion
determined by LC–MS.
1-Methoxy-2-isopropanol.
Dimethylacetamide.
Dimethylformamide.
Dimethylsulfoxide.
500 equiv used.30% (v/v)
cosolvent used.Conversion
determined by LC–MS.1-Methoxy-2-isopropanol.Dimethylacetamide.Dimethylformamide.Dimethylsulfoxide.With this established condition
in hand, we explored the scope
of this reaction with a range of nitroarene substrates (Scheme ). Based on our previous success,
we first applied these conditions against o-amino
nitroarenes. Gratifyingly, o-amino anilines 2a–e were cleanly formed, suggesting this
protocol could be useful for benzimidazole DECL processes. To examine
electronic effects, we investigated the formation of electronic deficient
sulfonyl-substituted anilines 2f–i, neutral anilines 2j–l, and electron-rich
methoxy-substituted anilines 2m–q. All provided the desired anilines in good to excellent yields,
although electron-rich nitro substrates were reduced at slower rates.
Notably, the urea linker used in 2k and 2l was tolerated, as ureas may be cleaved under some basic conditions.
Substrates with functional groups susceptible to off-target reduction,
such as aldehyde 1r and nitriles 1s and 1t, underwent nitro reduction without significant formation
of reduced side products. Halogenated nitroarenes are known to be
problematic substrates due to the formation of dehalogenated byproducts.[17] Although formation of halogenated 2u–y was realized, the desired anilines were formed
in lowered yields, and significant dehalogenation was observed for
brominated 1y. Potential coordination of a nearby group
did not inhibit reduction (methyl ester 2z and free acid 2aa), and steric effects appeared minimal (ortho-disubstituted 2bb). Extension of these conditions to
nitro-substituted heterocycles was successful, with pyridyl substrates 1cc–ee, azoles 1ff and 1gg, and electron-rich heterocycles 1hh–jj all providing the desired amine product in moderate to
excellent yields. Finally, application to aliphatic nitro substrates 1kk and 1ll furnished the expected amines. Some
on-DNA transformations exhibit DNA length related effects, particularly
when optimized on short DNA substrates.[18] To simulate a late-stage substrate in a DECL synthesis, we prepared
substrate 3 from nitroarene 1m, which features
a 56-bp dsDNA tag. Application of the reduction conditions efficiently
provided the desired aniline, no evidence of DNA decomposition was
detected by LC–MS or gel electrophoresis, and the product underwent
efficient ligation with an additional DNA tag to form 4 (Scheme ; see the Supporting Information for full details).
Scheme 1
Substrate Scope of the Nitro Reduction
The conversions of nitro substrates 1 to amino products 2 are shown. Conversion determined
by LC–MS.
On a
1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid linker.
Significant debromination also observed.
Product observed as the carboxylic
acid.
Scheme 2
DNA Length, Stability, and Ligation Test
Substrate Scope of the Nitro Reduction
The conversions of nitro substrates 1 to amino products 2 are shown. Conversion determined
by LC–MS.On a
1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid linker.Significant debromination also observed.Product observed as the carboxylic
acid.As this reaction proceeded
at significantly lower temperatures
than previously reported,[14] we sought to
further validate formation of the presumed on-DNA aniline product.
Using similar conditions modified for decigram scale, nitroarene substrates 5 and 7 both provided the desired amine products
in good or better isolated yield within 5 min (Scheme ). Thus, further optimization of this system
may be useful for applications in which acidic/hydrogenation conditions
are problematic or for which metal contamination must be minimized.[19]
Scheme 3
Nitro Reduction with B2(OH)4 on Decigram Scale
Having demonstrated the wide substrate scope of this reaction,
we next sought to use the nitro reduction within a three-cycle, split-and-pool
type DECL synthesis. Within this DECL synthesis, each cycle consists
of an initial split of DNA “headpiece”-derived materials
into hundreds of wells, the attachment and/or transformation of a
unique building block, ligation of a unique encoding pair (“codon”)
of DNA oligonucleotides, and a final pooling. Thus, a three-cycle
DECL featuring hundreds of unique building blocks per cycle will produce
a collection of millions of small-molecule structures each connected
to a unique, identifying DNA sequence. Within the first cycle, all
transformations may be directly observed by LC–MS, but later
cycles have complex spectra due to pooling and require other analysis
methods.[20] After DECL synthesis is completed,
adapted samples of the DECL may be amplified and sequenced to allow
analysis of the population of DNA sequences within the sample. Altogether,
evaluation of post-transformation cycle 1 LC–MS traces, analysis
of intra-DECL sequence populations, comparison of the sequencing fidelity/amplification
efficiency to other in-house DECLs of identical DNA architecture,[21] and the discovery of structurally confirmed
DECL hits are definitive tests to determine a new transformation’s
DNA tolerance, susceptibility to DNA base-specific effects, and overall
suitability for practical DECL applications.Starting from a
DNA headpiece functionalized with linkers featuring
either amino or carboxyl termini that had been split into hundreds
of individual wells, N-Boc-protected amino acids
and nitro-functionalized benzoic acids were connected through acylation,
nitro-functionalized benzaldehydes were added through reductive alkylation,
and N-Boc protected diamines and nitro-functionalized
anilines were attached through a “reverse” acylation
reaction (Scheme ).
Within each well, unique encoding DNA tags (codon 1) were then ligated,
followed by deprotection of N-Boc carbamates or reduction
of a nitro group to the corresponding amine. Before pooling, each
well was assessed by LC–MS to determine if the building block
coupled, if DNA ligation was completed, if the amino group was fully
formed, and if the final cycle 1 product was made in high purity.
As the deprotections were performed after the codon 1 tag ligation,
the nitro reduction conditions were applied to hundreds of DNA-linked
substrates that each contained a unique 30-bp dsDNA tag. Although
some variability in amidation efficiencies was observed (e.g., for
very electron-deficient nitro-anilines), in general, coupled nitro
substrates cleanly reduced to the amine with our hypodiboric acid
conditions (>80% conversion). However, consistent with previous
rate
observations, some substrates with electron-donating groups para to the nitro group had moderate conversions (∼50%).
Upon pooling and precipitation, post-cycle 1 DNA recovery was excellent
and similar to other in-house DECL productions. After this material
was split into hundreds of wells, well-specific ligation of cycle
2 codons and amine substrate functionalization by either nucleophilic
substitution of heteroaromatic dihalides, acylation of carboxyl-functionalized
aromatic halides, or reductive amination of aldehyde-functionalized
aromatic halides was performed. After pooling, this material underwent
a third cycle of splitting, functionalization through palladium-catalyzed
cross-coupling of boronic acids and anilines, and ligation of cycle
3 codons to ultimately provide a DECL of ∼75 million compounds
(full details are available in the Supporting Information).
Scheme 4
Use of Nitro Reduction in a DECL Synthesis
To probe for potential sequence-specific
or well-specific effects,
a sample of the library was elaborated with DNA tags to enable a “naïve”
sequencing to assess the distribution of codons within the unselected
DECL. In DECL productions unbiased by reaction-induced DNA damage,
incomplete codon ligations, or varying DNA recovery, cycle 1 codon
populations are expected to follow a Gaussian distribution.[22] Furthermore, as only a subset of the DECL proceeded
through a nitro reduction pathway, comparison of codon populations
encoding substrates that underwent the nitro reduction versus the N-Boc deprotection would serve as an intra-DECL control
for potential nonspecific DNA damage. Gratifyingly, naïve sample
amplification efficiency and the sequence fidelity of amplicons were
within expected ranges,[21] no sequence-dependent
population effects were detected, codon 1 distributions were approximately
Gaussian, and the normalized populations of cycle 1 codons for each
deprotection pathway were nearly equivalent (Figure ).[22]
Figure 2
Normalized,
observed cycle 1 codon populations from the unselected
DECL split by an associated chemical deprotection method (N-Boc deprotection or nitro reduction).[22]
Normalized,
observed cycle 1 codon populations from the unselected
DECL split by an associated chemical deprotection method (N-Boc deprotection or nitro reduction).[22]Finally, this DECL was utilized
in a selection[23] against the kinase PLK1,
an important regulator of cell
division in eukaryotic cells.[24] After a
three-round selection of the DECL against recombinant His-PLK1, amplification,
and sequencing, cheminformatics analysis[25] and hit resynthesis revealed a compound series which inhibited PLK1
kinase activity at low nanomolar concentrations. This series contained
1,3-diaminobenzene[26] which had been produced
in cycle 1 through two independent pathways: the N-Boc deprotection of acylated 3-(Boc-amino)aniline and the reduction
of acylated 3-nitroaniline. Enrichment of DNA encoding this building
block by each pathway was comparable at the mono-, di-, and trisynthon[27] levels (Figure ), providing additional evidence that the nitro reduction
provided the expected amine product and did not induce pathway-specific
effects on later DECL synthetic transformations (see the Supporting Information for selection details
and n-synthon analysis).
Figure 3
Structures of the mono-,
di-, and trisynthons of the PLK1 hit series
with 1,3-diaminobenzene. Components from cycle 1 are black/blue, cycle
2 are red, and cycle 3 are green.
Structures of the mono-,
di-, and trisynthons of the PLK1 hit series
with 1,3-diaminobenzene. Components from cycle 1 are black/blue, cycle
2 are red, and cycle 3 are green.In summary, we have developed a DNA-compatible nitro reduction
for application to aromatic and aliphatic nitro groups that maintains
DNA integrity and ligation efficiency. The utility of this methodology
was demonstrated in the synthesis of a DECL which was applied to a
kinase target. This methodology should complement existing nitro reduction
approaches and be useful in future DECL productions.
Authors: Jie Wang; Helena Lundberg; Shota Asai; Pedro Martín-Acosta; Jason S Chen; Stephen Brown; William Farrell; Russell G Dushin; Christopher J O'Donnell; Anokha S Ratnayake; Paul Richardson; Zhiqing Liu; Tian Qin; Donna G Blackmond; Phil S Baran Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anokha S Ratnayake; Mark E Flanagan; Timothy L Foley; Justin D Smith; Jillian G Johnson; Justin Bellenger; Justin I Montgomery; Brian M Paegel Journal: ACS Comb Sci Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 3.784
Authors: Jian-Yuan Li; Gabriella Miklossy; Ram K Modukuri; Kurt M Bohren; Zhifeng Yu; Murugesan Palaniappan; John C Faver; Kevin Riehle; Martin M Matzuk; Nicholas Simmons Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Olivier B C Monty; Pranavanand Nyshadham; Kurt M Bohren; Murugesan Palaniappan; Martin M Matzuk; Damian W Young; Nicholas Simmons Journal: ACS Comb Sci Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.784
Authors: Zhifeng Yu; Angela F Ku; Justin L Anglin; Rajesh Sharma; Melek Nihan Ucisik; John C Faver; Feng Li; Pranavanand Nyshadham; Nicholas Simmons; Kiran L Sharma; Sureshbabu Nagarajan; Kevin Riehle; Gundeep Kaur; Banumathi Sankaran; Marta Storl-Desmond; Stephen S Palmer; Damian W Young; Choel Kim; Martin M Matzuk Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ying-Chu Chen; John C Faver; Angela F Ku; Gabriella Miklossy; Kevin Riehle; Kurt M Bohren; Melek N Ucisik; Martin M Matzuk; Zhifeng Yu; Nicholas Simmons Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.774