Literature DB >> 30860855

A Mild, DNA-Compatible Nitro Reduction Using B2(OH)4.

Huang-Chi Du1, Nicholas Simmons1, John C Faver1, Zhifeng Yu1, Murugesan Palaniappan1, Kevin Riehle1, Martin M Matzuk1.   

Abstract

A hypodiboric acid system for the reduction of nitro groups on DNA-chemical conjugates has been developed. This transformation provided good to excellent yields of the reduced amine product for a variety of functionalized aromatic, heterocyclic, and aliphatic nitro compounds. DNA tolerance to reaction conditions, extension to decigram scale reductions, successful use in a DNA-encoded chemical library synthesis, and subsequent target selection are also described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30860855      PMCID: PMC6457042          DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Org Lett        ISSN: 1523-7052            Impact factor:   6.005


DNA-encoded chemical library (DECL) screens are an economic and efficient method for hit discovery.[1] Recent advances in DNA high-throughput sequencing and DNA synthesis have enabled routine screens of large DECL collections,[2] and successful reports of DECL-based target campaigns have spurred wide interest in the platform.[1,3] However, solution-phase synthesis of DECLs is limited by constraints imposed by DNA-integrity and DNA-solubility concerns.[4] Adaptation of common chemical reactions to a mild, generally applicable, and partially aqueous condition is needed to expand the repertoire of both DNA-compatible chemical transformations[5] as well as available DECL chemical space.[6] Nitro-substituted, bifunctional compounds represent a versatile set of building blocks for the synthesis of DECLs—as an incorporation of the nitro functional group for select drug–target classes,[7] as a substituent to facilitate other reactions under DNA-compatible conditions (e.g., nucleophilic aromatic substitution[8]), but most importantly as a widely commercially available set of masked, bifunctional anilines that can be unveiled and screened directly or further functionalized in a subsequent build cycle. As a routine transformation in drug synthesis, numerous methods[9] have been developed for nitro reduction with metal reagents, such as iron[10a] or zinc,[10b] as well as nonmetallic reagents, such as sodium dithionite[10c] and trichlorosilane.[10d] However, in the context of DECL synthesis there are limited disclosed methods. Satz and co-workers have utilized a Raney-nickel system,[5a] we have described a sodium dithionite protocol,[11] and recently, Ding et al. have developed an iron sulfate condition[12] for use in the on-DNA synthesis of benzimidazoles through an SNAr, o-amino nitro reduction, and aldehyde condensation sequence (Figure A). However, to the best of our knowledge, all of these conditions have only been widely demonstrated in the reduction of o-aminonitroarenes, and our attempts to develop dithionite as a general reducing agent for nitroarenes was not successful.[13] Seeking a general condition for the synthesis of nonbenzimidazole DECLs, we initiated studies to develop a mild and general nitro reduction for application to a wide variety of on-DNA nitro substrates (Figure , B).
Figure 1

On-DNA nitro reductions: (A) conditions from previous work using Raney-Ni, sodium dithionite, or iron sulfate for the reduction of ortho-amino nitroarenes; (B) this work.

On-DNA nitro reductions: (A) conditions from previous work using Raney-Ni, sodium dithionite, or iron sulfate for the reduction of ortho-amino nitroarenes; (B) this work. We were intrigued by recent reports which utilized diboron reagents for nitro reduction, with bis(pinacolato)diboron in basic, alcoholic solvent at 110 °C[14a] or hypodiboric acid in neutral water at 80 °C,[14b] conditions that might be tolerated by DNA. We initiated our studies on substrate-functionalized “headpiece” DNA commonly used in DECL synthesis, which features a distal amino group for compound attachments covalently connected to two complementary DNA strands via a PEG-type bifurcated linker (our “headpiece” DNA is 17-bp dsDNA with a 3′ overhang; see the Supporting Information for the full structure). As our DECL reaction optimization and applications were conducted on nanomole amounts of DNA at micromolar concentrations, reaction assessments were conducted by LC–MS.[15] Preliminary on-DNA nitro reduction experiments utilizing bis(pinacolato)diboron failed, likely due to aqueous temperature limitations and poor reagent solubility. However, upon switching to water-soluble hypodiboric acid,[16] a small amount of 2a was observed for model nitroarene 1a at ambient temperature in aqueous alcoholic solvent (Table , entry 1). Encouraged by this result, we began a pH screen (Table , entries 2–5) which revealed a clear trend toward enhanced conversions under increasingly basic conditions. This is consistent with a proposed mechanism for diboron-mediated nitro reduction, in which reduction is promoted by coordination of an alkoxide to boron.[14] We next set out to determine cosolvent effects, utilizing several common, water-miscible organic solvents. Use of acetonitrile, dimethylacetamide, dimethylformamide, and pure water provided lowered conversion to 2a, and although DMSO provided the aniline in excellent conversion, high amounts of DMSO may impair isolation of DNA (Table , entries 5–10). Ultimately, use of aqueous ethanol with B2(OH)4 and NaOH cleanly provided 2a in >95% conversion after only 2 h (Table , entry 11).
Table 1

Optimization of Nitro Reduction Conditions

entrybuffer/baseacosolventb2ac (%)
1pH 8.2 borateMIPOd11
2pH 5.5 phosphateMIPO<5
3pH 10.6 borateMIPO28
4pH 12 phosphateMIPO26
5NaOHMIPO81
6NaOHCH3CN80
7NaOHnone78
8NaOHDMAe68
9NaOHDMFf40
10NaOHDMSOg93
11NaOHCH3CH2OH>95

500 equiv used.

30% (v/v) cosolvent used.

Conversion determined by LC–MS.

1-Methoxy-2-isopropanol.

Dimethylacetamide.

Dimethylformamide.

Dimethylsulfoxide.

500 equiv used. 30% (v/v) cosolvent used. Conversion determined by LC–MS. 1-Methoxy-2-isopropanol. Dimethylacetamide. Dimethylformamide. Dimethylsulfoxide. With this established condition in hand, we explored the scope of this reaction with a range of nitroarene substrates (Scheme ). Based on our previous success, we first applied these conditions against o-amino nitroarenes. Gratifyingly, o-amino anilines 2a–e were cleanly formed, suggesting this protocol could be useful for benzimidazole DECL processes. To examine electronic effects, we investigated the formation of electronic deficient sulfonyl-substituted anilines 2f–i, neutral anilines 2j–l, and electron-rich methoxy-substituted anilines 2m–q. All provided the desired anilines in good to excellent yields, although electron-rich nitro substrates were reduced at slower rates. Notably, the urea linker used in 2k and 2l was tolerated, as ureas may be cleaved under some basic conditions. Substrates with functional groups susceptible to off-target reduction, such as aldehyde 1r and nitriles 1s and 1t, underwent nitro reduction without significant formation of reduced side products. Halogenated nitroarenes are known to be problematic substrates due to the formation of dehalogenated byproducts.[17] Although formation of halogenated 2u–y was realized, the desired anilines were formed in lowered yields, and significant dehalogenation was observed for brominated 1y. Potential coordination of a nearby group did not inhibit reduction (methyl ester 2z and free acid 2aa), and steric effects appeared minimal (ortho-disubstituted 2bb). Extension of these conditions to nitro-substituted heterocycles was successful, with pyridyl substrates 1cc–ee, azoles 1ff and 1gg, and electron-rich heterocycles 1hh–jj all providing the desired amine product in moderate to excellent yields. Finally, application to aliphatic nitro substrates 1kk and 1ll furnished the expected amines. Some on-DNA transformations exhibit DNA length related effects, particularly when optimized on short DNA substrates.[18] To simulate a late-stage substrate in a DECL synthesis, we prepared substrate 3 from nitroarene 1m, which features a 56-bp dsDNA tag. Application of the reduction conditions efficiently provided the desired aniline, no evidence of DNA decomposition was detected by LC–MS or gel electrophoresis, and the product underwent efficient ligation with an additional DNA tag to form 4 (Scheme ; see the Supporting Information for full details).
Scheme 1

Substrate Scope of the Nitro Reduction

The conversions of nitro substrates 1 to amino products 2 are shown. Conversion determined by LC–MS.

On a 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid linker.

Significant debromination also observed.

Product observed as the carboxylic acid.

Scheme 2

DNA Length, Stability, and Ligation Test

Substrate Scope of the Nitro Reduction

The conversions of nitro substrates 1 to amino products 2 are shown. Conversion determined by LC–MS. On a 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid linker. Significant debromination also observed. Product observed as the carboxylic acid. As this reaction proceeded at significantly lower temperatures than previously reported,[14] we sought to further validate formation of the presumed on-DNA aniline product. Using similar conditions modified for decigram scale, nitroarene substrates 5 and 7 both provided the desired amine products in good or better isolated yield within 5 min (Scheme ). Thus, further optimization of this system may be useful for applications in which acidic/hydrogenation conditions are problematic or for which metal contamination must be minimized.[19]
Scheme 3

Nitro Reduction with B2(OH)4 on Decigram Scale

Having demonstrated the wide substrate scope of this reaction, we next sought to use the nitro reduction within a three-cycle, split-and-pool type DECL synthesis. Within this DECL synthesis, each cycle consists of an initial split of DNA “headpiece”-derived materials into hundreds of wells, the attachment and/or transformation of a unique building block, ligation of a unique encoding pair (“codon”) of DNA oligonucleotides, and a final pooling. Thus, a three-cycle DECL featuring hundreds of unique building blocks per cycle will produce a collection of millions of small-molecule structures each connected to a unique, identifying DNA sequence. Within the first cycle, all transformations may be directly observed by LC–MS, but later cycles have complex spectra due to pooling and require other analysis methods.[20] After DECL synthesis is completed, adapted samples of the DECL may be amplified and sequenced to allow analysis of the population of DNA sequences within the sample. Altogether, evaluation of post-transformation cycle 1 LC–MS traces, analysis of intra-DECL sequence populations, comparison of the sequencing fidelity/amplification efficiency to other in-house DECLs of identical DNA architecture,[21] and the discovery of structurally confirmed DECL hits are definitive tests to determine a new transformation’s DNA tolerance, susceptibility to DNA base-specific effects, and overall suitability for practical DECL applications. Starting from a DNA headpiece functionalized with linkers featuring either amino or carboxyl termini that had been split into hundreds of individual wells, N-Boc-protected amino acids and nitro-functionalized benzoic acids were connected through acylation, nitro-functionalized benzaldehydes were added through reductive alkylation, and N-Boc protected diamines and nitro-functionalized anilines were attached through a “reverse” acylation reaction (Scheme ). Within each well, unique encoding DNA tags (codon 1) were then ligated, followed by deprotection of N-Boc carbamates or reduction of a nitro group to the corresponding amine. Before pooling, each well was assessed by LC–MS to determine if the building block coupled, if DNA ligation was completed, if the amino group was fully formed, and if the final cycle 1 product was made in high purity. As the deprotections were performed after the codon 1 tag ligation, the nitro reduction conditions were applied to hundreds of DNA-linked substrates that each contained a unique 30-bp dsDNA tag. Although some variability in amidation efficiencies was observed (e.g., for very electron-deficient nitro-anilines), in general, coupled nitro substrates cleanly reduced to the amine with our hypodiboric acid conditions (>80% conversion). However, consistent with previous rate observations, some substrates with electron-donating groups para to the nitro group had moderate conversions (∼50%). Upon pooling and precipitation, post-cycle 1 DNA recovery was excellent and similar to other in-house DECL productions. After this material was split into hundreds of wells, well-specific ligation of cycle 2 codons and amine substrate functionalization by either nucleophilic substitution of heteroaromatic dihalides, acylation of carboxyl-functionalized aromatic halides, or reductive amination of aldehyde-functionalized aromatic halides was performed. After pooling, this material underwent a third cycle of splitting, functionalization through palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling of boronic acids and anilines, and ligation of cycle 3 codons to ultimately provide a DECL of ∼75 million compounds (full details are available in the Supporting Information).
Scheme 4

Use of Nitro Reduction in a DECL Synthesis

To probe for potential sequence-specific or well-specific effects, a sample of the library was elaborated with DNA tags to enable a “naïve” sequencing to assess the distribution of codons within the unselected DECL. In DECL productions unbiased by reaction-induced DNA damage, incomplete codon ligations, or varying DNA recovery, cycle 1 codon populations are expected to follow a Gaussian distribution.[22] Furthermore, as only a subset of the DECL proceeded through a nitro reduction pathway, comparison of codon populations encoding substrates that underwent the nitro reduction versus the N-Boc deprotection would serve as an intra-DECL control for potential nonspecific DNA damage. Gratifyingly, naïve sample amplification efficiency and the sequence fidelity of amplicons were within expected ranges,[21] no sequence-dependent population effects were detected, codon 1 distributions were approximately Gaussian, and the normalized populations of cycle 1 codons for each deprotection pathway were nearly equivalent (Figure ).[22]
Figure 2

Normalized, observed cycle 1 codon populations from the unselected DECL split by an associated chemical deprotection method (N-Boc deprotection or nitro reduction).[22]

Normalized, observed cycle 1 codon populations from the unselected DECL split by an associated chemical deprotection method (N-Boc deprotection or nitro reduction).[22] Finally, this DECL was utilized in a selection[23] against the kinase PLK1, an important regulator of cell division in eukaryotic cells.[24] After a three-round selection of the DECL against recombinant His-PLK1, amplification, and sequencing, cheminformatics analysis[25] and hit resynthesis revealed a compound series which inhibited PLK1 kinase activity at low nanomolar concentrations. This series contained 1,3-diaminobenzene[26] which had been produced in cycle 1 through two independent pathways: the N-Boc deprotection of acylated 3-(Boc-amino)aniline and the reduction of acylated 3-nitroaniline. Enrichment of DNA encoding this building block by each pathway was comparable at the mono-, di-, and trisynthon[27] levels (Figure ), providing additional evidence that the nitro reduction provided the expected amine product and did not induce pathway-specific effects on later DECL synthetic transformations (see the Supporting Information for selection details and n-synthon analysis).
Figure 3

Structures of the mono-, di-, and trisynthons of the PLK1 hit series with 1,3-diaminobenzene. Components from cycle 1 are black/blue, cycle 2 are red, and cycle 3 are green.

Structures of the mono-, di-, and trisynthons of the PLK1 hit series with 1,3-diaminobenzene. Components from cycle 1 are black/blue, cycle 2 are red, and cycle 3 are green. In summary, we have developed a DNA-compatible nitro reduction for application to aromatic and aliphatic nitro groups that maintains DNA integrity and ligation efficiency. The utility of this methodology was demonstrated in the synthesis of a DECL which was applied to a kinase target. This methodology should complement existing nitro reduction approaches and be useful in future DECL productions.
  32 in total

Review 1.  DNA-encoded chemistry: enabling the deeper sampling of chemical space.

Authors:  Robert A Goodnow; Christoph E Dumelin; Anthony D Keefe
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Twenty-five Years of DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  Dario Neri
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.164

3.  Kinetically guided radical-based synthesis of C(sp3)-C(sp3) linkages on DNA.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Helena Lundberg; Shota Asai; Pedro Martín-Acosta; Jason S Chen; Stephen Brown; William Farrell; Russell G Dushin; Christopher J O'Donnell; Anokha S Ratnayake; Paul Richardson; Zhiqing Liu; Tian Qin; Donna G Blackmond; Phil S Baran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selective catalytic hydrogenation of nitro groups in the presence of activated heteroaryl halides.

Authors:  Annie J Kasparian; Cecile Savarin; Alan M Allgeier; Shawn D Walker
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Employing Photoredox Catalysis for DNA-Encoded Chemistry: Decarboxylative Alkylation of α-Amino Acids.

Authors:  Dominik K Kölmel; Richard P Loach; Thomas Knauber; Mark E Flanagan
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Robust Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling on DNA-linked substrates.

Authors:  Yun Ding; Matthew A Clark
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.784

Review 7.  Playing polo during mitosis: PLK1 takes the lead.

Authors:  G Combes; I Alharbi; L G Braga; S Elowe
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Nitro-Group-Containing Drugs.

Authors:  Kunal Nepali; Hsueh-Yun Lee; Jing-Ping Liou
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 9.  DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries: A Selection System Based on Endowing Organic Compounds with Amplifiable Information.

Authors:  Dario Neri; Richard A Lerner
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 23.643

10.  Design and Development of a Technology Platform for DNA-Encoded Library Production and Affinity Selection.

Authors:  Jesús Castañón; José Pablo Román; Theodore C Jessop; Jesús de Blas; Rubén Haro
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.341

View more
  13 in total

1.  Multistep Synthesis of 1,2,4-Oxadiazoles via DNA-Conjugated Aryl Nitrile Substrates.

Authors:  Huang-Chi Du; Madison C Bangs; Nicholas Simmons; Martin M Matzuk
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.774

2.  A Solution Phase Platform to Characterize Chemical Reaction Compatibility with DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Synthesis.

Authors:  Anokha S Ratnayake; Mark E Flanagan; Timothy L Foley; Justin D Smith; Jillian G Johnson; Justin Bellenger; Justin I Montgomery; Brian M Paegel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.784

Review 3.  DNA-Encoded Chemistry: Drug Discovery from a Few Good Reactions.

Authors:  Patrick R Fitzgerald; Brian M Paegel
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 72.087

4.  Palladium-Catalyzed Hydroxycarbonylation of (Hetero)aryl Halides for DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Synthesis.

Authors:  Jian-Yuan Li; Gabriella Miklossy; Ram K Modukuri; Kurt M Bohren; Zhifeng Yu; Murugesan Palaniappan; John C Faver; Kevin Riehle; Martin M Matzuk; Nicholas Simmons
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.774

5.  Homogeneous and Functional Group Tolerant Ring-Closing Metathesis for DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  Olivier B C Monty; Pranavanand Nyshadham; Kurt M Bohren; Murugesan Palaniappan; Martin M Matzuk; Damian W Young; Nicholas Simmons
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.784

6.  Discovery and characterization of bromodomain 2-specific inhibitors of BRDT.

Authors:  Zhifeng Yu; Angela F Ku; Justin L Anglin; Rajesh Sharma; Melek Nihan Ucisik; John C Faver; Feng Li; Pranavanand Nyshadham; Nicholas Simmons; Kiran L Sharma; Sureshbabu Nagarajan; Kevin Riehle; Gundeep Kaur; Banumathi Sankaran; Marta Storl-Desmond; Stephen S Palmer; Damian W Young; Choel Kim; Martin M Matzuk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  DNA-encoded libraries (DELs): a review of on-DNA chemistries and their output.

Authors:  Ying Shi; Yan-Ran Wu; Jian-Qiang Yu; Wan-Nian Zhang; Chun-Lin Zhuang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.361

8.  In-solution direct oxidative coupling for the integration of sulfur/selenium into DNA-encoded chemical libraries.

Authors:  Shilian Yang; Guixian Zhao; Yuting Gao; Yang Sun; Gong Zhang; Xiaohong Fan; Yangfeng Li; Yizhou Li
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  Converting Double-Stranded DNA-Encoded Libraries (DELs) to Single-Stranded Libraries for More Versatile Selections.

Authors:  Yuhan Gui; Clara Shania Wong; Guixian Zhao; Chao Xie; Rui Hou; Yizhou Li; Gang Li; Xiaoyu Li
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-03-24

10.  C-N Coupling of DNA-Conjugated (Hetero)aryl Bromides and Chlorides for DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Synthesis.

Authors:  Ying-Chu Chen; John C Faver; Angela F Ku; Gabriella Miklossy; Kevin Riehle; Kurt M Bohren; Melek N Ucisik; Martin M Matzuk; Zhifeng Yu; Nicholas Simmons
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.774

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.