Literature DB >> 30854822

[Comparison of the two magnetic resonance deartifact techniques in imaging of different porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns].

Wen-Jin Li1, Jin-Liang Niu2, Li Zhu1, Yu Wang1, Ying An1, Shuang-Yuan Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crown artifact in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the two magnetic resonance deartifact techniques in studying the application value of the propeller-fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequence (FSE T2WI) in troubleshooting PFM crown artifacts.
METHODS: A total of 48 patients with right mandible first molar crown who underwent MRI head examination were chosen as subjects in the study. According to different metal substrates, PFM crowns were divided to three types, namely, nickel-chromium alloy crown, cobalt-chromium alloy crown and titanium crown. The patients received two MRI scan sequences, that is, FSE T2WI and propeller-FSE T2WI sequences. The MRI artifacts areas in two sequences were measured.
RESULTS: The difference between FSE T2WI and propeller-FSE T2WI sequences in three kinds of PFM crown was significant (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Propeller-FSE T2WI sequence technique can effectively reduce the metal artifacts of various PFM crowns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance imaging; metal artifact; porcelain-fused-to-metal; propeller

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30854822      PMCID: PMC7030724          DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 1000-1182


  9 in total

1.  Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.

Authors:  Jana Starcuková; Zenon Starcuk; Hana Hubálková; Igor Linetskiy
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects.

Authors:  Andre L F Costa; Simone Appenzeller; Clarissa-Lin Yasuda; Fabrício R Pereira; Verônica A Zanardi; Fernando Cendes
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2009-06-01

3.  MRI disturbances caused by dental materials.

Authors:  A Bryll; A Urbanik; R Chrzan; A Jurczak; H Kwapińska; B Sobiecka
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2007-02-28

4.  Evaluation of cholesteatoma: our experience with DW Propeller imaging.

Authors:  Amit Karandikar; Siu Cheng Loke; Julian Goh; Seng Beng Yeo; Tiong Yong Tan
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  The effects of SENSE on PROPELLER imaging.

Authors:  Yuchou Chang; James G Pipe; John P Karis; Wende N Gibbs; Nicholas R Zwart; Michael Schär
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Impact of the Static and Radiofrequency Magnetic Fields Produced by a 7T MR Imager on Metallic Dental Materials.

Authors:  Kenta Oriso; Takuya Kobayashi; Makoto Sasaki; Ikuko Uwano; Hidemichi Kihara; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  [Contrastive analysis of artifacts produced by metal dental crowns in 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging with six sequences].

Authors:  Gao Lan; Lian Yunmin; Wang Pu; Huai Haili
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2016-06

8.  [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].

Authors:  F H Blankenstein; B Truong; A Thomas; R J Schröder; M Naumann
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2006-08

9.  A comparative study of metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zahra Dalili Kajan; Jalil Khademi; Ahmad Alizadeh; Yasamin Babaei Hemmaty; Zahra Atrkar Roushan
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-09-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.