Literature DB >> 17884157

Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.

Jana Starcuková1, Zenon Starcuk, Hana Hubálková, Igor Linetskiy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that dental materials vary significantly in MR-relevant material parameters-magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity, and that knowledge of these parameters may be used to estimate the quality of MR imaging in the presence of devices made of such materials.
METHODS: Magnetic susceptibility, electrical conductivity and artifacts were evaluated for 45 standardized cylindrical samples of dental alloys and amalgams. Magnetic susceptibility was determined by fitting the phase of gradient-echo MR images to numerically modeled data. Electrical conductivity was determined by standard electrotechnical measurements. Artifact sizes were measured in spin-echo (SE) and gradient-echo (GE) images at 1.5T according to the standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials.
RESULTS: It has been confirmed that dental materials differ considerably in their magnetic susceptibility, electrical conductivity and artifacts. For typical dental devices, magnetic susceptibility differences were found of little clinical importance for diagnostic SE/GE imaging of the neck and brain, but significant for orofacial imaging. Short-TE GE imaging has been found possible even in very close distances from dental devices made of amalgams, precious alloys and titanium alloys. Nickel-chromium and cobalt-chromium artifacts were found still acceptable, but large restorations of aluminum bronzes may preclude imaging of the orofacial region. The influence of electrical conductivity on the artifact size was found negligible. SIGNIFICANCE: MR imaging is possible even close to dental devices if they are made of dental materials with low magnetic susceptibility. Not all materials in current use meet this requirement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17884157     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  22 in total

1.  Usefulness of IDEAL T2 imaging for homogeneous fat suppression and reducing susceptibility artefacts in brachial plexus MRI at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Bianca Bignotti; Giulio Tagliafico; Carlo Martinoli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  A R G Cortes; R Abdala-Junior; M Weber; E S Arita; J L Ackerman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  [Comparison of the two magnetic resonance deartifact techniques in imaging of different porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns].

Authors:  Wen-Jin Li; Jin-Liang Niu; Li Zhu; Yu Wang; Ying An; Shuang-Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-02-01

4.  Influence of dental materials on dental MRI.

Authors:  O Tymofiyeva; S Vaegler; K Rottner; J Boldt; A J Hopfgartner; P C Proff; E J Richter; P M Jakob
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Quantifying the effect of posterior spinal instrumentation on the MRI signal of adjacent intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Mary H Foltz; Robert M O'Leary; Diana Reader; Nicholas L Rudolph; Krista A Schlitter; Jutta Ellermann; Casey P Johnson; David W Polly; Arin M Ellingson
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-05-24

6.  Artefacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Maximilian Schöllchen; Tobias Gauer; Ghazal Aarabi; Alexandre T Assaf; Carsten Rendenbach; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Jan Semmusch; Jan Sedlacik; Max Heiland; Jens Fiehler; Susanne Siemonsen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.

Authors:  Shumei Murakami; Rinus G Verdonschot; Miyoshi Kataoka; Naoya Kakimoto; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Sven Kreiborg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  High-resolution 3D magnetic resonance imaging and quantification of carious lesions and dental pulp in vivo.

Authors:  Olga Tymofiyeva; Julian Boldt; Kurt Rottner; Florian Schmid; Ernst-Juergen Richter; Peter M Jakob
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Whole-Brain Functional and Diffusion Tensor MRI in Human Participants with Metallic Orthodontic Braces.

Authors:  Xinyuan Miao; Yuankui Wu; Dapeng Liu; Hangyi Jiang; David Woods; Moshe T Stern; Nicholas I S Blair; Raag D Airan; Chetan Bettegowda; Keri S Rosch; Qin Qin; Peter C M van Zijl; Jay J Pillai; Jun Hua
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Quantitative evaluation of artefact reduction from metallic dental materials in short tau inversion recovery imaging: efficacy of syngo WARP at 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  Lan Thi Xuan Tran; Junichiro Sakamoto; Ami Kuribayashi; Hiroshi Watanabe; Hiroshi Tomisato; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.