| Literature DB >> 30841896 |
Yang Yang1, Xiaoxiao Zhou2, Mengqin Zhang3, Yichi Zhou4, Bin Wang5, Chiting Yuan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The extensile lateral approach (ELA) has been widely used to treat displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) and remains the gold standard procedure. Orthopedic surgeons are extremely concerned of the high rate of wound complications. This study intended to report a new surgical technique of the lateral wall osteotomy combined with an embedded biodegradable implant for treating DIACFs and assess clinical and radiological results.Entities:
Keywords: Biodegradable implants; Calcaneal fractures; Lateral wall osteotomy; Outcomes; Wound complications
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30841896 PMCID: PMC6402087 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1111-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Illustrations of the surgical procedures and technique. A transverse L-shaped extensile lateral incision and osteotomy of the lateral wall of the calcaneus with a sharp and wide osteotome are made. The bone flap containing the integrated skin and subcutaneous tissue is retracted, and the subtalar joint is exposed (a, b). After fracture reduction, the biodegradable plate is implanted and Kirschner wires are used to fixate the fractured fragments provisionally; then, the biodegradable screws are driven into the prefabricated holes (c). The periosteum is sutured with Vicryl 2-0 (d)
Fig. 2The “Y” shape of the biodegradable plate (a), and the incision is closed using interrupted vertical mattress sutures without drains (b)
Preoperative and last follow-up radiological results
| Item | Preoperative | Last follow-up | Improvement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Böhler’s angle (degrees) | 9.82 ± 8.47 | 25.40 ± 6.62 | 15.58 | < 0.001 |
| Gissane’s angle (degrees) | 111.68 ± 14.44 | 120.06 ± 13.90 | 8.38 | 0.038 |
| Height (mm) | 41.47 ± 4.37 | 49.12 ± 4.14 | 7.65 | < 0.001 |
| Width (mm) | 44.78 ± 3.73 | 42.27 ± 2.70 | 2.51 | 0.005 |
All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Differences are considered significant at p < 0.05
General data of all patients
| Item | Values | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 14/3 | |
| Age (year) | 46.72 ± 8.56 | 31–60 |
| Delayed time (day) | 5.79 ± 2.23 | 2–9 |
| Hospital stay duration (day) | 12.21 ± 2.96 | 6–20 |
| Sander’s classification | ||
| II | 5 | |
| III | 10 | |
| IV | 4 | |
| Follow-up (month) | 34.69 ± 5.22 | 28–48 |
| Operative limb (left/right/both) | 8/7/2 | |
| Bone graft ( | 7 | |
| Wound complications ( | 1 | |
| Screw breakage ( | 2 | |
| Sural nerve lesion ( | 0 | |
| AOFAS scores | 84.37 ± 9.98 | 65–95 |
| Excellent ( | 9 | |
| Good ( | 6 | |
| Fair ( | 4 | |
Abbreviation: AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society
Fig. 3Radiographs of a 43-year-old male patient admitted for left calcaneal fractures of Sander’s type III (a, b). Lateral (c) and axial (d) views at 36 months post-surgery showing bony union of the fracture and the lateral wall (red arrow); several screw holes remain (white arrow). Sagittal and coronal MR images (e, f) showing partial absorption of biodegradable implants. The extension range of motion (g) and the flexion range of motion (h) at the final follow-up are displayed