Literature DB >> 22043969

Short-term and long-term effects of orthopedic biodegradable implants.

Ami R Amini1, James S Wallace, Syam P Nukavarapu.   

Abstract

Presently, orthopedic and oral/maxillofacial implants represent a combined $2.8 billion market, a figure expected to experience significant and continued growth. Although traditional permanent implants have been proved clinically efficacious, they are also associated with several drawbacks, including secondary revision and removal surgeries. Non-permanent, biodegradable implants offer a promising alternative for patients, as they provide temporary support and degrade at a rate matching tissue formation, and thus, eliminate the need for secondary surgeries. These implants have been in clinical use for nearly 25 years, competing directly with, or maybe even exceeding, the performance of permanent implants. The initial implantation of biodegradable materials, as with permanent materials, mounts an acute host inflammatory response. Over time, the implant degradation profile and possible degradation product toxicity mediate long-term biodegradable implant-induced inflammation. However, unlike permanent implants, this inflammation is likely to cease once the material disappears. Implant-mediated inflammation is a critical determinant for implant success. Thus, for the development of a proactive biodegradable implant that has the ability to promote optimal bone regeneration and minimal detrimental inflammation, a thorough understanding of short- and long-term inflammatory events is required. Here, we discuss an array of biodegradable orthopedic implants, their associated short- and long- term inflammatory effects, and methods to mediate these inflammatory events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22043969      PMCID: PMC3470866          DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v21.i2.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants        ISSN: 1050-6934


  157 in total

1.  Long-term tissue response to bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide and metallic screws: an experimental study.

Authors:  Harri Pihlajamäki; Ole Böstman; Olli Tynninen; Outi Laitinen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Degradation behavior of hydrophilized PLGA scaffolds prepared by melt-molding particulate-leaching method: comparison with control hydrophobic one.

Authors:  Se Heang Oh; Soung Gon Kang; Jin Ho Lee
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; R K Schenk; S Steinemann; J P Fiorellini; C H Fox; H Stich
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-07

4.  Biological evaluation of chitosan nanofiber membrane for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Seung-Yun Shin; Ho-Nam Park; Kyoung-Hwa Kim; Myung-Hee Lee; Young Suk Choi; Yoon-Jeong Park; Yong-Moo Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Soo-Boo Han; Seung-Jin Lee; Chong-Pyoung Chung
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Effect of surface texture on the soft tissue response to polymer implants.

Authors:  S R Taylor; D F Gibbons
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1983-03

Review 6.  Polylactide-polyglycolide antibiotic implants.

Authors:  Kevin Garvin; Connie Feschuk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Dendrimer-like PEO glycopolymers exhibit anti-inflammatory properties.

Authors:  Shyam M Rele; Wanxing Cui; Lianchun Wang; Sijian Hou; Ginger Barr-Zarse; Daniel Tatton; Yves Gnanou; Jeffrey D Esko; Elliot L Chaikof
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Biomaterial surface chemistry dictates adherent monocyte/macrophage cytokine expression in vitro.

Authors:  W G Brodbeck; Y Nakayama; T Matsuda; E Colton; N P Ziats; J M Anderson
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.861

9.  Phenotypic dichotomies in the foreign body reaction.

Authors:  James M Anderson; Jacqueline A Jones
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition.

Authors:  K A Thomas; S D Cook
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1985-10
View more
  27 in total

1.  Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Douglas J Adams; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Oxygen Tension-Controlled Matrices with Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Cells for Vascularized Bone Regeneration In Vivo.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Thomas O Xu; Ramaswamy M Chidambaram; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Design and evaluation of collagen-inspired mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Akhil Patel; Samer H Zaky; Karen Schoedel; Hongshuai Li; Vinayak Sant; Elia Beniash; Charles Sfeir; Donna B Stolz; Shilpa Sant
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

5.  Cytocompatibility and early inflammatory response of human endothelial cells in direct culture with Mg-Zn-Sr alloys.

Authors:  Aaron F Cipriano; Amy Sallee; Myla Tayoba; Mayra C Cortez Alcaraz; Alan Lin; Ren-Guo Guan; Zhan-Yong Zhao; Huinan Liu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Self-neutralizing PLGA/magnesium composites as novel biomaterials for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Thomas O Xu; Hyun S Kim; Tyler Stahl; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.715

7.  Degradation of Bioresorbable Mg-4Zn-1Sr Intramedullary Pins and Associated Biological Responses in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Aaron F Cipriano; Jiajia Lin; Alan Lin; Amy Sallee; Belinda Le; Mayra Celene Cortez Alcaraz; Ren-Guo Guan; Gary Botimer; Serkan Inceoğlu; Huinan Liu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 9.229

8.  A comparison of the performance of mono- and bi-component electrospun conduits in a rat sciatic model.

Authors:  Valentina Cirillo; Basak A Clements; Vincenzo Guarino; Jared Bushman; Joachim Kohn; Luigi Ambrosio
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Kinetic degradation and biocompatibility evaluation of polycaprolactone-based biologics delivery matrices for regenerative engineering of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Anupama Prabhath; Varadraj N Vernekar; Vignesh Vasu; Mary Badon; Jean-Emmanuel Avochinou; Alexandru D Asandei; Sangamesh G Kumbar; Eckhard Weber; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA) in medical implants and theranostic systems.

Authors:  Dana da Silva; Maya Kaduri; Maria Poley; Omer Adir; Nitzan Krinsky; Janna Shainsky-Roitman; Avi Schroeder
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 13.273

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.