Literature DB >> 25616846

Comparison of miniplates and biodegradable plates in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap.

N K Kim1, W Nam2, H J Kim3.   

Abstract

Miniplates and reconstruction plates are usually used to fix a fibular free flap, the gold standard in reconstruction of large segmental mandibular defects. Though biodegradable plates are used in orthognathic operations and repair of fractures nowadays, we know of no studies of the use of biodegradable plates in the reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects including a fibular free flap. We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients who had reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects with fibular free flaps during the past 10 years, and recorded clinical data and morbidity. We compared patients who had reconstruction of such defects with fibular free flaps and miniplates (n=26) with those in whom biodegradable plates had been used (n=21). There was no significant difference between miniplates and biodegradable plates with regard to overall complications (p=0.45) and failure of flaps (p=0.59). After confounding factors had been adjusted for with Cox's proportional hazards regression, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who developed a complication between the two groups (p=0.4). The type of plate does not seem to affect overall morbidity in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap.
Copyright © 2014 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodegradable plate; Fixation; Free fibular flap; Mandible; Miniplate; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616846     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of complications and flap losses in mandibular reconstruction with microvascularized fibula flap.

Authors:  Guilherme Klein Parise; Maria Isabela Guebur; Gyl Henrique Albrecht Ramos; Anne Karoline Groth; Alfredo Benjamin Duarte da Silva; Laurindo Moacir Sassi
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-25

2.  Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T.

Authors:  Carsten Rendenbach; Max Schoellchen; Julie Bueschel; Tobias Gauer; Jan Sedlacik; Daniel Kutzner; Pekka K Vallittu; Max Heiland; Ralf Smeets; Jens Fiehler; Susanne Siemonsen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Mini-plate versus reconstruction bar fixation for oncologic mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Sobti; Kaleem S Ahmed; Thais Polanco; Marina Chilov; Marc A Cohen; Jay Boyle; Farooq Shahzad; Evan Matros; Jonas A Nelson; Robert J Allen
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  Lateral wall osteotomy combined with embedded biodegradable implants for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Xiaoxiao Zhou; Mengqin Zhang; Yichi Zhou; Bin Wang; Chiting Yuan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft.

Authors:  Qifeng Ou; Panfeng Wu; Zhengbing Zhou; Ding Pan; Ju-Yu Tang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Retrospective analysis of complications in 190 mandibular resections and simultaneous reconstructions with free fibula flap, iliac crest flap or reconstruction plate: a comparative single centre study.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Thomas Mücke; Diandra Hart; Tobias Unterhuber; Victoria Kehl; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.