Literature DB >> 30840097

Cup alignment in total hip arthroplasty using the muscle-sparing modified Watson-Jones approach-comparison between lateral and supine positions.

Yuichi Kishimura1,2, Yukihide Minoda3, Shigekazu Mizokawa1,2, Ryo Sugama1, Yoichi Ohta1, Hiroaki Nakamura1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the cup alignment outliers in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the same surgical approach with the patient in the supine position versus the lateral position.
METHODS: THA using the muscle-sparing modified Watson-Jones approach was performed in 142 consecutive hips. THA was performed with the patient in the lateral position in 84 hips (lateral group) and in the supine position in 58 hips (supine group). The cup alignment was aimed at 40° inclination and 20° anteversion by referring to the mechanical alignment guide. Cup alignment and outliers (10° > aimed alignment) were assessed using post-operative 3D-CT.
RESULTS: The absolute error from the aimed inclination was 6.0 ± 4.7° in the supine group and 4.2 ± 3.6° in the lateral group (p = 0.01). The absolute error from the aimed anteversion was 4.1 ± 3.2° in the supine group and 5.1 ± 3.7° in the lateral group (p = 0.12). The supine group showed a higher rate of outliers than the lateral group for the cup inclination (22% vs 5%; p < 0.01). Inclination and BMI were positively correlated in the spine position group (p < 0.01, R = 0.48), but were not correlated in the lateral position group.
CONCLUSION: THA performed with the patient in the supine position has a higher risk of outliers of cup alignment compared with the lateral position, even when the same surgical approach is used. BMI affected the cup inclination in the supine position.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cup alignment; Lateral position; Muscle-sparing modified Watson-Jones approach; Supine position; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30840097     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04316-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  26 in total

1.  Pelvic tilt and movement during total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Masayuki Kanazawa; Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Goro Motomura; Takuaki Yamamoto; Jun-Ichi Fukushi; Takahiro Ushijima; Daisuke Hara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.023

2.  Clinical accuracy and precision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty using computed tomography-based navigation.

Authors:  Ryuichi Sato; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Keishi Marumo; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning.

Authors:  Jorge Rojas; Maria Bautista; Guillermo Bonilla; Omar Amado; Elina Huerfano; Daniel Monsalvo; Adolfo Llinás; José Navas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

5.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component.

Authors:  R Biedermann; A Tonin; M Krismer; F Rachbauer; G Eibl; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

7.  CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA.

Authors:  Bernard Ghelman; Christopher K Kepler; Stephen Lyman; Alejandro González Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.

Authors:  Hidenobu Miki; Wataru Yamanashi; Takashi Nishii; Yoshinobu Sato; Hideki Yoshikawa; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients.

Authors:  Henrik Olivecrona; Lars Weidenhielm; Lotta Olivecrona; Mats O Beckman; André Stark; Marilyn E Noz; Gerald Q Maguire; Michael P Zeleznik; Lars Svensson; Torbjörn Jonson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-06

10.  Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device.

Authors:  Ken Suda; Tomoyuki Ito; Dai Miyasaka; Norio Imai; Izumi Minato; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Differences in the setting of acetabular component alignment guides between the supine and lateral positions for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Ryo Sugama; Yoichi Ohta; Susumu Takemura; Nobuo Yamamoto; Tamotsu Nakatsuchi; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Migliorini; A Trivellas; J Eschweiler; A Driessen; F Lessi; M Tingart; P Aretini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-05-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.