Literature DB >> 31450267

Modelling an adult human head on a donut-shaped gel head support for pressure ulcer prevention.

Rona Katzengold1, Amit Gefen1.   

Abstract

Patients who are stationary endure prolonged pressures and shear loads at contact areas between their body and the support surface, which over time may cause pressure ulcers (PUs). Donut-shaped gel head supports are commonly used to protect the occiput, which is among the most common anatomical sites for PUs; however, the biomechanical efficacy of these devices is unclear. To investigate their effects on scalp tissues, we have used our three-dimensional anatomically realistic finite element model of an adult head, to which we have added a donut-shaped gel head support. We then compared the occipital scalp tissue loads' occurrence while the donut-shaped gel head support is in use with those associated with a fluidised head positioner and a standard medical foam. The donut-shaped gel head support inflicted the greatest exposure to tissue mechanical stresses, particularly to the high (and therefore dangerous) stress domain, when compared to the other positioners. We concluded that while the donut-shaped gel head support is designed to avert tissue loads away from the occiput and disperse them to the surroundings, in practice, it fails to do so. In fact, the donut-shaped gel head support imposes the head-weight forces to transfer through a relatively narrow ring of scalp tissues, hence increasing the risk of developing occipital PUs. KEY MESSAGES: a donut-shaped gel head support is meant to reduce the occurrence of pressure ulcers in scalp tissues to investigate the effects of donut-shaped gel head support on scalp tissues, we have used our anatomically realistic computational model of an adult head the donut-shaped gel head support imposes the head-weight forces to transfer through a relatively narrow ring of scalp tissues the highly distorted and deformed tissues at that ring are at a high risk for injury.
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep tissue injury; finite element modelling; head support; positioner; prophylaxis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31450267      PMCID: PMC7949180          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  22 in total

1.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Viscoelastic properties of ovine adipose tissue covering the gluteus muscles.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Einat Haberman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Evaluation of a fluidised positioner to reduce occipital pressure injuries in intensive care patients: A pilot study.

Authors:  Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Michelle Lai; Amit Gefen; Fiona Coyer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  A Computer Modeling Study to Assess the Durability of Prophylactic Dressings Subjected to Moisture in Biomechanical Pressure Injury Prevention.

Authors:  Dafna Schwartz; Ayelet Levy; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non-offloaded sacral pressure ulcer.

Authors:  Dafna Schwartz; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  AORN ergonomic tool 2: positioning and repositioning the supine patient on the OR bed.

Authors:  Thomas Waters; Manon Short; John Lloyd; Andrea Baptiste; Lorraine Butler; Carol Petersen; Audrey Nelson
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.676

7.  Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Zehava Ovadia-Blechman; Oshrit Hoffer; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Quantifying the effects of external shear loads on arterial and venous blood flow: implications for pressure ulcer development.

Authors:  Abinand Manorama; Ronald Meyer; Robert Wiseman; Tamara Reid Bush
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Back to basics: positioning the patient.

Authors:  Lisa Spruce; Sharon A Van Wicklin
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 10.  Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults.

Authors:  Brigid M Gillespie; Wendy P Chaboyer; Elizabeth McInnes; Bridie Kent; Jennifer A Whitty; Lukman Thalib
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Critical biomechanical and clinical insights concerning tissue protection when positioning patients in the operating room: A scoping review.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Sue Creehan; Joyce Black
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Corrigendum.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Modelling an adult human head on a donut-shaped gel head support for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Rona Katzengold; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  The biomechanical efficacy of a hydrogel-based dressing in preventing facial medical device-related pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.099

6.  Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lea Peko; Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Evaluation of facial tissue stresses under medical devices post application of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant: An integrated experimental-computational study.

Authors:  Raz Margi; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.