Literature DB >> 18361618

Computation of binding free energy with molecular dynamics and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations.

Yuqing Deng1, Benoît Roux.   

Abstract

The binding of a ligand to a receptor is often associated with the displacement of a number of bound water molecules. When the binding site is exposed to the bulk region, this process may be sampled adequately by standard unbiased molecular dynamics trajectories. However, when the binding site is deeply buried and the exchange of water molecules with the bulk region may be difficult to sample, the convergence and accuracy in free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations can be severely compromised. These problems are further compounded when a reduced system including only the region surrounding the binding site is simulated. To address these issues, we couple molecular dynamics (MD) with grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations to allow the number of water to fluctuate during an alchemical FEP calculation. The atoms in a spherical inner region around the binding pocket are treated explicitly while the influence of the outer region is approximated using the generalized solvent boundary potential (GSBP). At each step during thermodynamic integration, the number of water in the inner region is equilibrated with GCMC and energy data generated with MD is collected. Free energy calculations on camphor binding to a deeply buried pocket in cytochrome P450cam, which causes about seven water molecules to be expelled, are used to test the method. It concluded that solvation free energy calculations with the GCMC/MD method can greatly improve the accuracy of the computed binding free energy compared to simulations with fixed number of water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18361618     DOI: 10.1063/1.2842080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  56 in total

1.  Effects of Water Placement on Predictions of Binding Affinities for p38α MAP Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  James Luccarelli; Julien Michel; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Let's get honest about sampling.

Authors:  David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Dependency of ligand free energy landscapes on charge parameters and solvent models.

Authors:  Yuko Okamoto; Toshimasa Tanaka; Hironori Kokubo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Assessing the accuracy of approximate treatments of ion hydration based on primitive quasichemical theory.

Authors:  Benoît Roux; Haibo Yu
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Absolute free energy of binding of avidin/biotin, revisited.

Authors:  Ignacio J General; Ralitsa Dragomirova; Hagai Meirovitch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 8.  Biomolecular simulation and modelling: status, progress and prospects.

Authors:  Marc W van der Kamp; Katherine E Shaw; Christopher J Woods; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Energetics of displacing water molecules from protein binding sites: consequences for ligand optimization.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.