Literature DB >> 30823419

Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance in Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. Isolates from Companion Animals in Japan: Nosocomial Dissemination of Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Citrobacter freundii.

Kazuki Harada1, Takae Shimizu2,3, Hiroichi Ozaki4, Yui Kimura5, Tadashi Miyamoto6, Yuzo Tsuyuki7.   

Abstract

In many countries including Japan, the status of emerging antimicrobial resistance among Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. in companion animals remains unknown because these genera are rarely isolated from animals. In this study, 30 Serratia spp. and 23 Citrobacter spp. isolates from companion animals underwent susceptibility testing for 10 antimicrobials. Phenotypic and genetic approaches were used to identify the mechanisms of extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC). Subsequently, ESC-resistant Citrobacter spp. strains underwent multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). A significantly higher rate (34.8%) of ESC resistance was observed in Citrobacter spp. isolates than in Serratia spp. isolates (0%). ESC resistance was detected in five C. freundii strains, two C. portucalensis strains, and one C. koseri strain. All of the ESC-resistant Citrobacter spp. strains harbored CMY-type and/or DHA-type AmpC β-lactamases. Three C. freundii strains harbored the CTX-M-3-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Notably, the three blaCTX-3-producing and two blaCMY-117-bearing C. freundii strains (obtained from different patients in one hospital) had the same sequence type (ST156 and ST18, respectively) and similar PFGE profiles. We believe that ESC-resistant Citrobacter spp. are important nosocomial pathogens in veterinary medicine. Therefore, infection control in animal hospitals is essential to prevent dissemination of these resistant pathogens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Citrobacter spp.; Serratia spp.; companion animals; extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance; nosocomial dissemination

Year:  2019        PMID: 30823419      PMCID: PMC6462910          DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7030064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microorganisms        ISSN: 2076-2607


1. Introduction

The genera of Serratia and Citrobacter, belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, are opportunistic nosocomial pathogens and cause a wide spectrum of human infections [1,2]. In companion animals, these genera are also rarely associated with infections such as pneumonitis, urinary tract infection, myocarditis, septicemia, and intravenous catheter site infection [3]. The Citrobacter genus previously comprised 11 species [4], but recently, two new species (i.e., C. pasteurii and C. portucalensis) have been proposed [5,6]. Serratia marcescens and Citrobacter freundii are the most important species in each genus, medically speaking [7,8]. However, the species distribution in these genera has not yet been elucidated in veterinary medicine. The emergence of multidrug resistance—notably, resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC)—among Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. is a worldwide concern to human medicine [1]. Together with Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., and Enterobacter spp., these genera are hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacilli which can easily develop antimicrobial resistance and are often grouped as the SPACE organisms [9]. ESC resistance in these bacteria is usually caused by overproduction of AmpC β-lactamases, secondary to the derepression of a chromosomal gene or acquisition of a transferable AmpC β-lactamase [9]. Additionally, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases have been identified in Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. [1,10], which exacerbates ESC resistance. However, in many countries including Japan, the status of emerging antimicrobial resistance among Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. in companion animals remains unknown. Therefore, we performed an epidemiological investigation of the predominance of antimicrobial resistance and provide molecular characterization of ESC resistance among Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. isolates recovered from clinical specimens of dogs and cats in Japan.

2. Materials and Methods

We evaluated a total of 53 clinical isolates including 30 Serratia spp. and 23 Citrobacter spp. isolates collected from dogs (n = 36) and cats (n = 17) housed by different owners who visited veterinary hospitals between 2012 and 2016. Table S1 shows the details of the isolates used in this study, including the specific locations of hospitals and isolation sites. Specimens were isolated using sterile cotton swabs from various anatomical sites, identified as sites of bacterial infection by many clinical veterinarians in 15 prefectures in Japan and submitted to Tottori University and Sanritsu Zelkova Laboratory for analysis. All confirmed isolates were stored at −80 °C in 10% skim milk. Bacterial species identification was determined based on growth conditions on CHROMagar orientation medium (Nippon Becton Dickinson and Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and by using the API 20E kit (SYSMEX bioMérieux Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), MicroScan WalkAway (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and MALDI-TOF MS with a Bruker MALDI Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). Additionally, the species of Citrobacter spp. isolates were confirmed based on the phylogeny of the recN (DNA repair protein) gene, as described previously [11]. Briefly, PCR amplification and further sequencing of recN genes were performed. Then, we constructed a phylogenetic tree based on the recN sequences of our strains and type strains of each species using MEGA version 7.0.18 [12] using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [13]. The genetic distance among these strains was calculated using the Kimura two-parameter model [14]. We determined the susceptibilities of these bacterial species to amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (ACV, Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., Tokyo, Japan), cephalothin (CPL, Sigma-Aldrich), cefmetazole (CMZ, Sigma-Aldrich), cefotaxime (CTX, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan), meropenem (Wako Pure Chemical), tetracycline (TET, Wako Pure Chemical), amikacin (Sigma-Aldrich), chloramphenicol (CHL, Wako Pure Chemical), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMS, Wako Pure Chemical), and ciprofloxacin (CIP, Wako Pure Chemical). We used the agar dilution method to perform susceptibility testing in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [15]. The susceptibility results were interpreted in relation to the CLSI guideline criteria [16]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control strain. ESC-resistant (i.e., minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for CTX of ≥ 4 µg/mL) strains were screened for ESBLs using the double-disc synergy test with CTX, ceftazidime, cefepime, and ACV disks on Mueller–Hinton agar plates with or without 200 µg/mL cloxacillin [17]. Additionally, ESC-resistant isolates without the synergistic effect of clavulanate and with inhibition zones enhanced by cloxacillin were classified as organisms overexpressing AmpC β-lactamase [18]. All ESC-resistant strains were screened for class A β-lactamase genes (i.e., blaTEM and blaSHV) and acquired AmpC β-lactamase (qAmpC) genes (i.e., the ACC, FOX, MOX, DHA, CIT, and EBC groups) on PCR as previously described [19,20]. The amplified products underwent bidirectional sequencing using specific primers [19,21]. In ESBL-positive strains, multiplex PCR was used to detect the CTX-M-type β-lactamase genes [22]. For the positive isolates, genes were amplified and sequenced to distinguish CTX-M subtypes using group-specific PCR primers [19]. A previous conjugation experiment [23] with slight modifications confirmed the transferability of ESBL genes. The E. coli DH5α strain (Thermo Fisher Scientific K.K., Tokyo, Japan) was used as a recipient, and transconjugants were selected on DHL-agar containing rifampicin (50 µg/mL) and CTX (2 µg/mL). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was conducted on ESC-resistant C. freundii strains as previously described [2,24]. Bacterial DNA was digested with XbaI and SfiI and electrophoresed using CHEF-DR II (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA). Then, PFGE profiles were digitized for analysis using GelCompar II (Applied Maths, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). Finally, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) with seven genes (i.e., aspC, clpX, fadD, mdh, arcA, dnaG, and lysP) was performed as previously described [25]. A new sequence type (ST) was submitted to the MLST website and new ST numbers were assigned.

3. Results and Discussion

Few studies have reported the species distribution and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in the overall population of Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. clinical isolates from companion animals. The bacterial species of our collection were identified by several conventional methods and finally determined by MALDI-TOF MS (in Serratia spp.) and recN phylogeny (in Citrobacter spp.). We classified 30 Serratia spp. isolates into S. marcescens (n = 26), S. liquefaciens (n = 2), S. fonticola (n = 1), and S. ureilytica (n = 1); therefore, S. marcescens is most likely the major species of the genus in companion animals and in human medicine [4]. We conclusively determined 23 Citrobacter spp. isolates based on recN phylogeny as follows: C. freundii (n = 9), C. koseri (n = 6), C. portucalensis (n = 6), and C. europaeus (n = 2) (Figure 1). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the isolation of C. portucalensis and C. europaeus strains from animals, although these species have been rarely reported in humans [26,27]. These findings imply the prevalence of several Citrobacter species in companion animals, in addition to C. freundii. We also found discrepancies in bacterial species between conventional phenotypic methods and the more reliable methods (i.e., MALDI TOF-MS and recN phylogeny) in several strains (Table S1); this suggests that phenotypic methods are limited in their ability to identify species of Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp.
Figure 1

Neighbor-joining tree based on recN gene sequences from our data collection and type strains of Citrobacter species. Genetic distances were constructed using Kimura’s two-parameter method. Bootstrap values obtained after 1000 replicates are given at the nodes [11]. The corresponding GenBank/Patric accession numbers of type strains refer to the previous report by Ribeiro et al. [6].

Table 1 shows the MIC distribution of the 10 tested antimicrobials in both genera. There were significant differences in overall resistance rates to six antimicrobials: Serratia spp. isolates exhibited higher rates of resistance to CPL (100%) and TET (86.7%), compared to the Citrobacter spp. isolates which exhibited higher rates of resistance to CTX (34.8%), CIP (26.1%), and TMS (17.4%). Previous work demonstrated higher rates of resistance to ACV (93.3%), CMZ (93.3%), CHL (46.7%), and CIP (43.3%) in Enterobacter spp. isolates from companion animals in Japan during 2003–2015 [28]. On the other hand, moderate rates of resistance to CIP (20.5% and 11.9%) were validated in Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. isolates from companion animals in Japan during the periods of 2003–2010 and 2012–2016, respectively [29,30], suggesting that SPACE organisms from companion animals have different antimicrobial resistance profiles by genus.
Table 1

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution and resistance rates among Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. isolates from dogs and cats.

AgentsGenera (No. of Isolates)MIC (µg/mL)No. of Resistance (%)
≤0.0310.0630.1250.250.51248163264128256>256
CPLSerratia (30) 3030 (100) *
Citrobacter (23) 221 14211018 (78.3)
CMZSerratia (30) 291054 4 (13.3)
Citrobacter (23) 131 15561 7 (30.4)
CTXSerratia (30) 214131 0 (0.0)
Citrobacter (23) 366 1112 128 (34.8) *
MPMSerratia (30)4251 0 (0.0)
Citrobacter (23)1931 0 (0.0)
TETSerratia (30) 11 27145 26 (86.7) *
Citrobacter (23) 11512 112 4 (17.4)
AMKSerratia (30) 43203 0 (0.0)
Citrobacter (23) 251321 0 (0.0)
CHLSerratia (30) 2141021 1 4 (13.3)
Citrobacter (23) 1741 1 2 (8.7)
CIPSerratia (30)44164 11 0 (0.0)
Citrobacter (23)6223112231 6 (26.1) *
0.125/0.0630.25/0.1250.5/0.251/0.52/14/28/48/1632/1664/32128/64256/128>256/128
ACVSerratia (30) 1312158 25 (83.3)
Citrobacter (23) 32 459 14 (60.9)
≤0.03/0.590.06/1.190.13/2.380.25/4.750.5/9.51/192/384/768/15216/30432/60864/1216>64/1216
TMSSerratia (30) 45183 0 (0.0)
Citrobacter (23) 95121 1 1 34 (17.4) *

CPL, cephalothin; CMZ, cefmetazole; CTX, cefotaxime; MPM, meropenem; TET, tetracycline; AMK, amikacin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ACV, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid; TMS, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Vertical lines indicate breakpoints of each drug according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline [10]. * Significant differences in resistance rates between Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. (p < 0.05).

ESC resistance was identified in none of the Serratia spp. isolates and in 8 of 23 Citrobacter spp. isolates, namely, C. freundii (n = 5), C. portucalensis (n = 2), and C. koseri (n = 1) (Table 2). All ESC-resistant isolates had an MIC for MPM of ≤ 0.125 µg/mL, indicating that these isolates were negative for carbapenemase [31]. Of these ESC-resistant Citrobacter spp. strains, the three C. freundii strains harbored nontransferable blaCTX-M-3, which has previously been detected in Enterobacteriaceae in companion animals in Japan [28,32,33], as well as in France [34], South Korea [35], and China [36]. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first report to detect blaCTX-M-3 among Citrobacter spp. isolates from companion animals, although Ewers et al. previously reported C. freundii isolates producing blaCTX-M-1 or blaSHV-12 in European countries [37]. The present study demonstrated ESBLs in 3 of 23 (13.0%) Citrobacter spp. isolates, comparable to previous work in companion animals in European countries (9/77, 11.7%) [37]. On the other hand, Kanamori et al. [2] previously detected ESBLs in 67 of 348 (19.3%) human isolates in Japan, but no evidence of blaCTX-M-3. Hence, it is likely that different types of ESBLs are prevalent in Citrobacter spp. isolates between companion animals and humans in Japan.
Table 2

Characterization of eight extended-spectrum cephalosporin (ESC)-resistant Citrobacter spp. strains from dogs and cats.

StrainYearHostOriginSTAmpC OverexpressionESBLsqAmpCsOther β-lactamasesMIC (μg/mL)b
ACVCPLCMZCTXMPMTETCHLAMKCIPTMS
C. freundii (n = 5)
Ci172016CatUrine18+ CMY-117TEM-164/32>25664320.063116288/152
Ci202016CatUrine156 *-CTX-M-3CMY-78-likeTEM-116/8>256162560.03118420.06/1.19
Ci292016CatUrine156 *-CTX-M-3CMY-78-likeTEM-116/8>2568>2560.031416240.25/4.75
Ci312016CatUrine18+ CMY-117 64/32>25664160.063128818>64/1216
Ci322016CatUrine156 *-CTX-M-3CMY-78-likeTEM-132/16>25616>2560.0313216882/38
C. portucalensis (n = 2)
Ci102015DogUrineNA+ DHA-1,CMY-37-like 64/32>2566480.125128128216>64/1216
Ci272016DogNasalNA+ CMY-13 64/32>256128320.0631844≤0.03/0.59
C. koseri (n = 1)
Ci72015DogUrineNANA DHA-1 64/32>2566440.0151810.250.5/9.5

NA, Not applicable. * ST156 was firstly identified in this study. ACV, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid; CPL, cephalothin; CMZ, cefmetazole; CTX, cefotaxime; MPM, meropenem; TET, tetracycline; CHL. Chloramphenicol; AMK, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; TMS, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole.

We also found a prevalence of AmpC β-lactamases among eight ESC-resistant Citrobacter spp. strains. Of the qAmpC genes, CMY-family β-lactamases (previously reported in Citrobacter spp., accession numbers: NG_048788, NG_048875, NG_048832, and NZ_QRJT01000009) were detected in seven strains: five C. freundii and two C. portucalensis strains. On the other hand, blaDHA-1 was identified in one C. portucalensis and one C. koseri strain, as well as the other Gram-negative bacteria from companion animals [28,33,38]. In addition, each of the two strains of C. freundii and C. portucalensis were chromosomal AmpC hyperproducers, which can confer resistance to cephalosporins, including later-generation compounds and some penicillins [39,40]. Our data indicate that these AmpC-mediated resistance mechanisms, as well as ESBLs, play a role in the prevalence of ESC-resistant Citrobacter spp. strains in companion animals. In the present study, we conducted MLST analysis for C. freundii isolates from animals for the first time. The three blaCTX-M-3-producing C. freundii strains (strains Ci20, Ci29, and Ci32) were assigned to ST156, which was the first ST identified in our study (Table 2). Additional analysis revealed a similar or identical antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and PFGE profiles of XbaI- and SfiI-digested genomic DNA among the three strains (Figure 2). In addition, the two CMY-117-bearing C. freundii strains (strains Ci17 and Ci31) were assigned to ST18, which was the previously identified ST in human-origin carbapenemase-producing C. freundii in Denmark [41], Spain [42], and Czech Republic [43], and had almost indistinguishable PFGE profiles. These ESC-resistant C. freundii strains were acquired from different animals in the same hospital, suggesting nosocomial infections. Similar findings have been observed in other ESBL-producing bacteria [28,33,38]. Therefore, infection control in hospitals is essential in preventing the dissemination of ESC-resistant Citrobacter spp. isolates among companion animals.
Figure 2

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles of eight ESC-producing Citrobacter strains digested with XbaI (A) and SfiI (B).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we described antimicrobial resistance, particularly ESC resistance, among Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. strains isolated from companion animals in Japan and established differences in the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance between those isolates. Moreover, we are the first to identify nosocomial dissemination of ESC-resistant C. freundii strains producing ESBLs or qAmpCs in companion animals. Although Citrobacter spp. are only rarely isolated from companion animals, these bacteria deserve continuous surveillance to determine the true risk of their antimicrobial resistance in veterinary and human medicine.
  3 in total

1.  Biosafety considerations and risk reduction strategy for a new veterinary faculty building and teaching hospital in Sweden.

Authors:  Martin Wierup; Ulrika Allard Bengtsson; Ivar Vågsholm
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-04

2.  Phylogeographical Landscape of Citrobacter portucalensis Carrying Clinically Relevant Resistomes.

Authors:  Fábio P Sellera; Miriam R Fernandes; Bruna Fuga; Herrison Fontana; Felipe Vásquez-Ponce; Daphne W Goldberg; Daniel F Monte; Larissa Rodrigues; Adriana R Cardenas-Arias; Ralf Lopes; Brenda Cardoso; Daniela G C Costa; Fernanda Esposito; Nilton Lincopan
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-31

3.  Editorial for Special Issue "Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens".

Authors:  Despoina Koulenti; Paraskevi C Fragkou; Sotirios Tsiodras
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-09-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.