Literature DB >> 15191086

Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current.

K L Kilgore1, N Bhadra.   

Abstract

High-frequency alternating current (AC) waveforms have been shown to produce a quickly reversible nerve block in animal models, but the parameters and mechanism of this block are not well understood. A frog sciatic nerve/gastrocnemius muscle preparation was used to examine the parameters for nerve conduction block in vivo, and a computer simulation of the nerve membrane was used to identify the mechanism for block. The results indicated that a 100% block of motor activity can be accomplished with a variety of waveform parameters, including sinusoidal and rectangular waveforms at frequencies from 2 kHz to 20 kHz. A complete and reversible block was achieved in 34 out of 34 nerve preparations tested. The most efficient waveform for conduction block was a 3-5 kHz constant-current biphasic sinusoid, where block could be achieved with stimulus levels as low as 0.01 microCphase(-1). It was demonstrated that the block was not produced indirectly through fatigue. Computer simulation of high-frequency AC demonstrated a steady-state depolarisation of the nerve membrane, and it is hypothesised that the conduction block was due to this tonic depolarisation. The precise relationship between the steady-state depolarisation and the conduction block requires further analysis. The results of this study demonstrated that high-frequency AC can be used to produce a fast-acting, and quickly reversible nerve conduction block that may have multiple applications in the treatment of unwanted neural activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191086     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  46 in total

1.  Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. IV. Effects of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  C Q Huang; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Electrical stimulation of the brain. III. The neural damage model.

Authors:  R H Pudenz; L A Bullara; S Jacques; F T Hambrecht
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1975-10

3.  Effects of high-rate electrical stimulation upon firing in modelled and real neurons.

Authors:  V Krauthamer; T Crosheck
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Selective activation of small motor axons by quasi-trapezoidal current pulses.

Authors:  Z P Fang; J T Mortimer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  An asymmetric two electrode cuff for generation of unidirectionally propagated action potentials.

Authors:  J D Sweeney; J T Mortimer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effects of variations in rectangular pulse duty cycle and intensity on pulsating direct current electro-analgesia of cat tooth pulp.

Authors:  R W Fields; R P O'Donnell; R B Tacke
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Manipulation of muscle force with various firing rate and recruitment control strategies.

Authors:  B H Zhou; R Baratta; M Solomonow
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Response of single alpha motoneurons to high-frequency pulse trains. Firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon.

Authors:  B R Bowman; D R McNeal
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1986

9.  Control of muscle contractile force through indirect high-frequency stimulation.

Authors:  M Solomonow; E Eldred; J Lyman; J Foster
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1983-04

10.  Dose-response study of the pathological effects of chronically applied direct current stimulation on the normal rat spinal cord.

Authors:  R J Hurlbert; C H Tator; E Theriault
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  78 in total

1.  Alternating current and infrared produce an onset-free reversible nerve block.

Authors:  Emilie H Lothet; Kevin L Kilgore; Niloy Bhadra; Narendra Bhadra; Tina Vrabec; Yves T Wang; E Duco Jansen; Michael W Jenkins; Hillel J Chiel
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.593

2.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

3.  Conduction block of whole nerve without onset firing using combined high frequency and direct current.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Mechanism of nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat; Changfeng Tai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  High frequency electrical conduction block of the pudendal nerve.

Authors:  Narendra Bhadra; Niloy Bhadra; Kevin Kilgore; Kenneth J Gustafson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Simulation of high-frequency sinusoidal electrical block of mammalian myelinated axons.

Authors:  Niloy Bhadra; Emily A Lahowetz; Stephen T Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Predicting myelinated axon activation using spatial characteristics of the extracellular field.

Authors:  E J Peterson; O Izad; D J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Influence of frequency and temperature on the mechanisms of nerve conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical current.

Authors:  Jicheng Wang; Bing Shen; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat; Changfeng Tai
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 9.  Measurement of block thresholds in kiloHertz frequency alternating current peripheral nerve block.

Authors:  Leah Marie Roldan; Thomas E Eggers; Kevin L Kilgore; Narendra Bhadra; Tina Vrabec; Niloy Bhadra
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Changsi Cai; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.