Literature DB >> 30805798

Multiple Rapid Swallows (MRS) Complements Single-Swallow (SS) Analysis for High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM).

Andrew Leopold1, Daohai Yu2, Rajiv Bhuta1, Rahul Kataria1, Xiaoning Lu2, Asad Jehangir1, Martha Harrison1, Frank Friedenberg1, Zubair Malik1, Ron Schey1, Henry P Parkman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) during HREM assess post-deglutitive inhibition, LES relaxation, and subsequent esophageal contraction. AIMS: (1) To determine the relationship between MRS and single-swallow (SS) responses and (2) to determine if MRS provides information for symptomatic patients.
METHODS: Healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients underwent HREM [30-s landmark, ten 5-mL SS, MRS (5 consecutive 2-mL swallows every 2-3 s)] and were analyzed with ManoView software version 3 with CC version 3.0.
RESULTS: In 20 HVs, MRS response consisted of: (1) reduction in GEJ pressure; (2) absence of esophageal contractile activity during MRS; and (3) post-MRS peristaltic contraction greater than SS contractions. In 20 HVs and 403 patients, MRS IRP correlated with SS IRP (r = 0.65; p < 0.0001) and post-MRS contraction DCI correlated with SS DCI (r = 0.76; p < 0.0001). Abnormally elevated MRS IRP was seen in 68% type 2 achalasia, 50% type 3 achalasia, 47% EGJOO, and 9% jackhammer. Increased MRS DCI was seen in 53% type 2 achalasia, 92% type 3 achalasia, 10% EGJOO, 22% jackhammer, and 18% DES. Increased DCI post-MRS was seen in 38% patients with jackhammer, 8% type 3 achalasia, 12% EGJOO, and 9% DES. 14 out of 143 (10%) patients with normal or indeterminate results on SS analysis had at least one abnormality on MRS.
CONCLUSIONS: MRS IRP correlated with SS IRP, and post-MRS DCI correlated with SS DCI. Patients with defined CC disorders have abnormalities on MRS. There were MRS abnormalities in some patients with normal SS studies, most notably suggesting impaired LES relaxation and/or spastic esophageal motility. MRS may complement the baseline SS study analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal motor disorders; High-resolution esophageal manometry; Multiple rapid swallows

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30805798     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05545-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  12 in total

1.  The value of multiple rapid swallows during preoperative esophageal manometry before laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Nathaniel Stoikes; Jesse Drapekin; Vladimir Kushnir; Anisa Shaker; L Michael Brunt; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry.

Authors:  F Fornari; I Bravi; R Penagini; J Tack; D Sifrim
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice.

Authors:  C P Gyawali; A J Bredenoord; J L Conklin; M Fox; J E Pandolfino; J H Peters; S Roman; A Staiano; M F Vaezi
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve.

Authors:  Anisa Shaker; Nathaniel Stoikes; Jesse Drapekin; Vladimir Kushnir; L Michael Brunt; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  M R Fox; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Multiple rapid swallowing in idiopathic achalasia: evidence for patients' heterogeneity.

Authors:  D Savojardo; M Mangano; P Cantù; R Penagini
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies.

Authors:  Y Xiao; F Nicodème; P J Kahrilas; S Roman; Z Lin; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Deglutitive inhibition, latency between swallow and esophageal contractions and primary esophageal motor disorders.

Authors:  Daniel Sifrim; Jafar Jafari
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.924

10.  200 mL Rapid Drink Challenge During High-resolution Manometry Best Predicts Objective Esophagogastric Junction Obstruction and Correlates With Symptom Severity.

Authors:  Philip Woodland; Shirley Gabieta-Sonmez; Julieta Arguero; Joanne Ooi; Kenichiro Nakagawa; Esteban Glasinovic; Etsuro Yazaki; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative physiological esophageal assessment for anti-reflux surgery: A guide for surgeons on high-resolution manometry and pH testing.

Authors:  Michael Yodice; Alexandra Mignucci; Virali Shah; Christopher Ashley; Micheal Tadros
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Chicago classification v4.0 protocol improves specificity and accuracy of diagnosis of oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Visaggi; Matteo Ghisa; Giulio Del Corso; Federica Baiano Svizzero; Lucia Mariani; Salvatore Tolone; Marzio Frazzoni; Andrea Buda; Massimo Bellini; Vincenzo Savarino; Roberto Penagini; C Prakash Gyawali; Edoardo V Savarino; Nicola de Bortoli
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 9.524

3.  Normal Values of High-resolution Manometry Parameters With Provocative Maneuvers.

Authors:  Hui Su; Amanda J Krause; Melina Masihi; Jacqueline Prescott; Alex Decorrevont; Emma Germond; Dave Karasik; Wenjun Kou; John E Pandolfino; Dustin A Carlson
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.