Literature DB >> 24019081

Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve.

Anisa Shaker1, Nathaniel Stoikes, Jesse Drapekin, Vladimir Kushnir, L Michael Brunt, C Prakash Gyawali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dysphagia may develop following antireflux surgery as a consequence of poor esophageal peristaltic reserve. We hypothesized that suboptimal contraction response following multiple rapid swallows (MRS) could be associated with chronic transit symptoms following antireflux surgery.
METHODS: Wet swallow and MRS responses on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) were characterized collectively in the esophageal body (distal contractile integral (DCI)), and individually in each smooth muscle contraction segment (S2 and S3 amplitudes) in 63 patients undergoing antireflux surgery and in 18 healthy controls. Dysphagia was assessed using symptom questionnaires. The MRS/wet swallow ratios were calculated for S2 and S3 peak amplitudes and DCI. MRS responses were compared in patients with and without late postoperative dysphagia following antireflux surgery.
RESULTS: Augmentation of smooth muscle contraction (MRS/wet swallow ratios >1.0) as measured collectively by DCI was seen in only 11.1% with late postoperative dysphagia, compared with 63.6% in those with no dysphagia and 78.1% in controls (P≤0.02 for each comparison). Similar results were seen with S3 but not S2 peak amplitude ratios. Receiver operating characteristics identified a DCI MRS/wet swallow ratio threshold of 0.85 in segregating patients with late postoperative dysphagia from those with no postoperative dysphagia with a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.64.
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of augmentation of smooth muscle contraction following MRS is associated with late postoperative dysphagia following antireflux surgery, suggesting that MRS responses could assess esophageal smooth muscle peristaltic reserve. Further research is warranted to determine if antireflux surgery needs to be tailored to the MRS response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24019081      PMCID: PMC4091619          DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  14 in total

1.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  The value of multiple rapid swallows during preoperative esophageal manometry before laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Nathaniel Stoikes; Jesse Drapekin; Vladimir Kushnir; Anisa Shaker; L Michael Brunt; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Value of preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Walter W Chan; Laura R Haroian; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice.

Authors:  C P Gyawali; A J Bredenoord; J L Conklin; M Fox; J E Pandolfino; J H Peters; S Roman; A Staiano; M F Vaezi
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Botulinum toxin injection in dysphagia syndromes with preserved esophageal peristalsis and incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.

Authors:  R F Porter; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  High-resolution manometric characteristics help differentiate types of distal esophageal obstruction in patients with peristalsis.

Authors:  C P Gyawali; V M Kushnir
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Variations in clinical presentation of patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities.

Authors:  W L Reidel; R E Clouse
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  High-resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility.

Authors:  Yinglian Xiao; Peter J Kahrilas; Mary J Kwasny; Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Frédéric Nicodème; Chang Lu; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  A wave of inhibition precedes primary peristaltic contractions in the human esophagus.

Authors:  D Sifrim; J Janssens; G Vantrappen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Deglutitive inhibition, latency between swallow and esophageal contractions and primary esophageal motor disorders.

Authors:  Daniel Sifrim; Jafar Jafari
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.924

View more
  63 in total

1.  Exaggerated smooth muscle contraction segments on esophageal high-resolution manometry: prevalence and clinical relevance.

Authors:  M D Mello; S Duraiswamy; L H Price; Y Li; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.

Authors:  K Nikaki; A Sawada; A Ustaoglu; D Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23

3.  GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation.

Authors:  A Patel; G S Sayuk; V M Kushnir; W W Chan; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Farhan Quader; Chanakyaram Reddy; Amit Patel; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Multiple Rapid Swallows (MRS) Complements Single-Swallow (SS) Analysis for High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM).

Authors:  Andrew Leopold; Daohai Yu; Rajiv Bhuta; Rahul Kataria; Xiaoning Lu; Asad Jehangir; Martha Harrison; Frank Friedenberg; Zubair Malik; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; J Drapekin; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Advances in Management of Esophageal Motility Disorders.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Albert J Bredenoord; Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

9.  More beads, more peristaltic reserve, better outcomes: factors predicting postoperative dysphagia after magnetic sphincter augmentation.

Authors:  Rebeca Dominguez-Profeta; Joslin N Cheverie; Rachel R Blitzer; Arielle M Lee; Lauren McClain; Ryan C Broderick; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Santiago Horgan; David C Kunkel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Identification of Quality Measures for Performance of and Interpretation of Data From Esophageal Manometry.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Andrew J Gawron; Rajesh N Keswani; Karl Bilimoria; Donald O Castell; Kerry B Dunbar; Chandra P Gyawali; Blair A Jobe; Philip O Katz; David A Katzka; Brian E Lacy; Benson T Massey; Joel E Richter; Felice Schnoll-Sussman; Stuart J Spechler; Roger Tatum; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.