Literature DB >> 22648115

The value of multiple rapid swallows during preoperative esophageal manometry before laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Nathaniel Stoikes1, Jesse Drapekin, Vladimir Kushnir, Anisa Shaker, L Michael Brunt, C Prakash Gyawali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When multiple swallows are rapidly administered, esophageal peristalsis is inhibited, and pronounced lower esophageal sphincter relaxation ensues. After the last swallow of the series, a robust contraction sequence results. The authors hypothesize that multiple rapid swallows (MRS) may have value in predicting esophageal transit symptoms in patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS).
METHODS: Records of patients undergoing esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) before LARS were evaluated. The evaluation of MRS included adequate inhibitory response during swallows and the contraction pattern after MRS. Dysphagia was scored based on a product of symptom frequency and severity using 5-point Likert scales. A composite dysphagia score comprised the sum of scores for solid and liquid dysphagia, and a score of 4 or higher was considered clinically significant. The normal and abnormal MRS responses of patients with preoperative, early, and late postoperative dysphagia were compared with those of patients with no dysphagia.
RESULTS: In this study, 63 patients (mean age, 60.3 ± 1.7 years, 48 women) undergoing HRM before LARS successfully performed MRS (median, 5 swallows; longest interval between swallows, 3.2 ± 0.1 s). After MRS, 14 patients (22.2%) had an intact peristaltic sequence. Complete failure of peristalsis was seen in 21 (33.3%), and incomplete esophageal inhibition in 25 (39.7%) of the remaining patients. When stratified by presence or absence of dysphagia, 58.3% of the subjects without dysphagia had a normal MRS response, whereas 83.3% had formation of peristaltic segments after MRS. In contrast, only 14% of the subjects with dysphagia had a normal MRS response (p ≤ 0.003 vs. the subjects with no dysphagia). Abnormal MRS responses were more prevalent in the patients with any preoperative and late postoperative dysphagia (p = 0.04 across groups) and in those with clinically significant dysphagia (p = 0.08 across groups).
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution manometry with MRS helps to predict dysphagia in subjects undergoing preoperative esophageal function testing before LARS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22648115      PMCID: PMC4098863          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2350-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

Review 1.  AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry.

Authors:  F Fornari; I Bravi; R Penagini; J Tack; D Sifrim
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  The influence of surgical technique on clinical outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  J S Wu; D L Dunnegan; D R Luttmann; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter pressure profiles 6 and 24 months after laparoscopic fundoplication and their association with postoperative dysphagia.

Authors:  M Anvari; C Allen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Postoperative problems 2011: fundoplication and obesity surgery.

Authors:  W O Rohof; R Bisschops; J Tack; G E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Botulinum toxin injection in dysphagia syndromes with preserved esophageal peristalsis and incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.

Authors:  R F Porter; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Influence of spastic motor disorders of the esophageal body on outcomes from laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  E R Winslow; R E Clouse; K M Desai; P Frisella; T Gunsberger; N J Soper; M E Klingensmith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J G Hunter; T L Trus; G D Branum; J P Waring; W C Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain.

Authors:  J E Richter; C F Barish; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Failing deglutitive inhibition in primary esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  D Sifrim; J Janssens; G Vantrappen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Parameters on esophageal pH-impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Multiple Rapid Swallows (MRS) Complements Single-Swallow (SS) Analysis for High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM).

Authors:  Andrew Leopold; Daohai Yu; Rajiv Bhuta; Rahul Kataria; Xiaoning Lu; Asad Jehangir; Martha Harrison; Frank Friedenberg; Zubair Malik; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; J Drapekin; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  What Is the Impact of High-Resolution Manometry in the Functional Diagnostic Workup of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?

Authors:  Jutta Keller
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-12

6.  Chicago classification for minor peristaltic abnormalities-Much ado about nothing!

Authors:  Mayank Jain; M Srinivas; Jayanthi Venkataraman
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08

Review 7.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

8.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

9.  Identification of Quality Measures for Performance of and Interpretation of Data From Esophageal Manometry.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Andrew J Gawron; Rajesh N Keswani; Karl Bilimoria; Donald O Castell; Kerry B Dunbar; Chandra P Gyawali; Blair A Jobe; Philip O Katz; David A Katzka; Brian E Lacy; Benson T Massey; Joel E Richter; Felice Schnoll-Sussman; Stuart J Spechler; Roger Tatum; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Ineffective esophageal motility phenotypes following fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M D Mello; A R Shriver; Y Li; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.