OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of 80kVp, high-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with iterative reconstruction using 20 ml of contrast agent. METHODS:One hundred patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were randomly divided into two groups (n = 50 each; group A, 100 kVp, 1.2 pitch, 60 ml of contrast medium and filtered back projection algorithm; group B, 80 kVp, 2.2 pitch, 20 ml of contrast medium and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction). Image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose were evaluated and compared. RESULTS:Mean CT numbers of pulmonary arteries in group B were higher than those in group A (all P < 0.001). Contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio of group B were higher than those of group A (both P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in subjective image quality scores between two groups (P = 0.807). The interobserver agreement was excellent (k = 0.836). There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with group A, radiation dose of group B was reduced by 50.3% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-pitch CTPA at 80 kVp can obtain sufficient image quality in normal-weight individuals with 20 ml of contrast agent and half the radiation dose of a conventional CTPA protocol. KEY POINTS: CTPA is feasible at 80 kVp using only 20 ml of contrast agent. High-pitch CTPA at 80 kVp has an effective dose under 1 mSv. This CTPA protocol can obtain sufficient image quality in normal-weight individuals.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of 80kVp, high-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with iterative reconstruction using 20 ml of contrast agent. METHODS: One hundred patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were randomly divided into two groups (n = 50 each; group A, 100 kVp, 1.2 pitch, 60 ml of contrast medium and filtered back projection algorithm; group B, 80 kVp, 2.2 pitch, 20 ml of contrast medium and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction). Image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Mean CT numbers of pulmonary arteries in group B were higher than those in group A (all P < 0.001). Contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio of group B were higher than those of group A (both P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in subjective image quality scores between two groups (P = 0.807). The interobserver agreement was excellent (k = 0.836). There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with group A, radiation dose of group B was reduced by 50.3% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-pitch CTPA at 80 kVp can obtain sufficient image quality in normal-weight individuals with 20 ml of contrast agent and half the radiation dose of a conventional CTPA protocol. KEY POINTS: CTPA is feasible at 80 kVp using only 20 ml of contrast agent. High-pitch CTPA at 80 kVp has an effective dose under 1 mSv. This CTPA protocol can obtain sufficient image quality in normal-weight individuals.
Authors: J Matthias Kerl; Thomas Lehnert; Boris Schell; Boris Bodelle; Martin Beeres; Volkmar Jacobi; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2011-10-22 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Stephan Baumueller; Anna Winklehner; Christoph Karlo; Robert Goetti; Thomas Flohr; Erich W Russi; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael A Bolen; Rahul D Renapurkar; Zoran B Popovic; Gustavo A Heresi; Scott D Flamm; Charles T Lau; Sandra S Halliburton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Babs M F Hendriks; Madeleine Kok; Casper Mihl; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Zachary B Poole; Christian Canstein; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Shu Min Tao; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Stephen R Fuller; Guang Ming Lu; Long Jiang Zhang Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 5.315