Literature DB >> 25660668

Three-dimensional printing of intracardiac defects from three-dimensional echocardiographic images: feasibility and relative accuracy.

Laura J Olivieri1, Axel Krieger2, Yue-Hin Loke3, Dilip S Nath4, Peter C W Kim2, Craig A Sable3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the advent of three-dimensional (3D) printers and high-resolution cardiac imaging, rapid prototype constructions of congenital cardiac defects are now possible. Typically, source images for these models derive from higher resolution, cross-sectional cardiac imaging, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. These imaging methods may involve intravenous contrast, sedation, and ionizing radiation. New echocardiographic transducers and advanced software and hardware have optimized 3D echocardiographic images for this purpose. Thus, the objectives of this study were to confirm the feasibility of creating cardiac models from 3D echocardiographic data and to assess accuracy by comparing 3D model measurements with conventional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic measurements of cardiac defects.
METHODS: Nine patients undergoing 3D echocardiography were identified (eight with ventricular septal defects, one with three periprosthetic aortic valve leaks). Raw echocardiographic image data were exported anonymously and converted to Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format. The image data were filtered for noise reduction, imported into segmentation software to create a 3D digital model, and printed. Measurements of the defects from the 3D model were compared with defect measurements from conventional 2D echocardiographic data. Meticulous care was taken to ensure identical measurement planes.
RESULTS: Long- and short-axis measurements of eight ventricular septal defects and three perivalvar leaks were obtained. Mean ± SD values for the 3D model measurements and conventional 2D echocardiographic measurements were 7.5 ± 6.3 and 7.1 ± 6.2 mm respectively (P = .20), indicating no significant differences between the standard 2D and 3D model measurements. The two groups were highly correlated, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.988. The mean absolute error (2D - 3D) for each measurement was 0.4 ± 0.9 mm, indicating accuracy of the 3D model of <1 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional printed models of echocardiographic data are technically feasible and may accurately reflect ventricular septal defect anatomy. Three-dimensional models derived from 3D echocardiographic data sets represent a new tool in procedural planning for children with congenital heart disease.
Copyright © 2015 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D echocardiography; 3D model; Cardiovascular surgery; Congenital heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25660668     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  47 in total

1.  Three dimensional printing of an atrial septal defect: Is it multimodality imaging?

Authors:  Giorgio Faganello; Carlo Campana; Manuel Belgrano; Giulia Russo; Marco Pozzi; Giovanni Cioffi; Andrea Di Lenarda
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Update on the Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Animesh Tandon; Gerald F Greil; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

Review 3.  Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Peter Liacouras; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started.

Authors:  Don Hoang; David Perrault; Milan Stevanovic; Alidad Ghiassi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 5.  Three-dimensional printed models in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cantinotti; Israel Valverde; Shelby Kutty
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Comparison of 3D Echocardiogram-Derived 3D Printed Valve Models to Molded Models for Simulated Repair of Pediatric Atrioventricular Valves.

Authors:  Adam B Scanlan; Alex V Nguyen; Anna Ilina; Andras Lasso; Linnea Cripe; Anusha Jegatheeswaran; Elizabeth Silvestro; Francis X McGowan; Christopher E Mascio; Stephanie Fuller; Thomas L Spray; Meryl S Cohen; Gabor Fichtinger; Matthew A Jolley
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 7.  Three-dimensional printing in structural heart disease and intervention.

Authors:  Yiting Fan; Randolph H L Wong; Alex Pui-Wai Lee
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

Review 8.  3D Printing Provides a Precise Approach in the Treatment of Tetralogy of Fallot, Pulmonary Atresia with Major Aortopulmonary Collateral Arteries.

Authors:  Shafkat Anwar; Toby Rockefeller; Demetrios A Raptis; Pamela K Woodard; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-03

9.  To what extent can 3D model replicate dimensions of individual mitral valve prolapse?

Authors:  Takashi Shirakawa; Masao Yoshitatsu; Yasushi Koyama; Akira Kurata; Toru Miyoshi; Hiroki Mizoguchi; Takafumi Masai; Koichi Toda; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 10.  Cardiac 3D Printing and its Future Directions.

Authors:  Marija Vukicevic; Bobak Mosadegh; James K Min; Stephen H Little
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.