| Literature DB >> 30781457 |
Shiva Rezaei Motlagh1, Razif Harun2, Dayang Radiah Awang Biak3, Siti Aslina Hussain4, Wan Azlina Wan Ab Karim Ghani5, Ramin Khezri6, Cecilia Devi Wilfred7, Amal A M Elgharbawy8.
Abstract
Omega-3 poly unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have many health benefits including reducing the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Recently, the use of ionic liquids (ILs) in lipid extraction from microalgae provides the potential to overcome common drawbacks, offers several other benefits. To date, very limited researches are available to focus on extracting microalgae lipid and PUFA in particular by using ILs. The objective of current work is to screen the potential ILs that can be applied in EPA extraction. In this study, fast ILs screening was performed with the help of a conductor like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) and the ILs with higher capacity values for use in extraction of EPA were compared. According to the results, the highest capacity for EPA extraction among 352 screened cation/anion combinations belongs to [TMAm][SO₄]. It is expected to achieve a higher yield of EPA once applying this combination as the solvent in the process of extraction. ILs with small anions were observed to have higher capacities, as well possessing higher charge density compared to larger ones, and therefore, they are more preferable for extraction purposes. Moreover, shorter alkyl chain cations are preferred when using imidazolium-based IL, which agrees with experimental data.Entities:
Keywords: COSMO-RS; EPA extraction; extraction capacity; infinite dilution activity coefficient; ionic liquids; omega-3; screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30781457 PMCID: PMC6412376 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24040713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(A) EPA chemical structure and (B) sigma surface.
Figure 2The σ-profile of EPA was obtained by COSMO-RS.
Figure 3The σ-potential of EPA was obtained by COSMO-RS.
Figure 4The capacity values at infinite dilution of (a) Imidazolium, (b) pyridinium, (c) Pyrrololidinium, (d) piperidinium, and (e) tetra-methyl ammonium cations alkyl chain length with 22 anion types for EPA extraction at T = 298.15 K.
Figure 5Proposed hydrogen bonding between the IL, [EMIM]+SO42−, EPA, and water available in the system during extraction.
Summarize the selective ILs for EPA extraction.
| # | Shortlisted ILs | Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficient at 298.15 K | Infinite Dilution Capacity at 298.15 K |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [TMAm]SO4 | 1.00 × 10−11 | 9.97 × 1010 |
| 2 | [TMAm]Cl | 9.52 × 10−10 | 1.05 × 109 |
| 3 | [TMAm]Br | 3.61 × 10−8 | 27677690 |
| 4 | [EMPyrro]SO4 | 4.40 × 10−7 | 2273253 |
| 5 | [EMPyrro]Cl | 1.68 × 10−5 | 59473.56 |
| 6 | [EMIM]SO4 | 1.87 × 10−5 | 53360.83 |
| 7 | [MPPIP]SO4 | 4.17 × 10−5 | 23995.28 |
| 8 | [EmPyr]SO4 | 7.10 × 10−5 | 14084.39 |
| 9 | [BMPyrro]SO4 | 9.03 × 10−5 | 11073.19 |
| 10 | [BPPIP]SO4 | 2.13 × 10−4 | 4689.32 |
| 11 | [EMPyrro]Br | 2.41 × 10−4 | 4147.65 |
| 12 | [EMIM]Cl | 6.61 × 10−4 | 1513.22 |
| 13 | [TMAm]propanoate | 6.97 × 10−4 | 1434.47 |
| 14 | [TMAm]NO3 | 8.39 × 10−4 | 1191.69 |
| 15 | [EMPyrro]propanoate | 8.67 × 10−4 | 1153.16 |
| 16 | [HMPyrro]SO4 | 9.62 × 10−4 | 1039.60 |
| 17 | [MPPIP]Cl | 1.01 × 10−3 | 991.30 |
| 18 | [BMIM]SO4 | 1.28 × 10−3 | 781.77 |
| 19 | [HPPIP]SO4 | 1.28 × 10−3 | 781.45 |
| 20 | [BmPyr]SO4 | 1.37 × 10−3 | 727.47 |
| 21 | [EmPyr]Cl | 1.74 × 10−3 | 575.71 |
Figure 6COSMO-RS calculation steps.
Structure of EPA.
| Shorthand Sign | Synthetic Name | Trivial Name | Formula | Chemical Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20:5 | Eicosapentanoic acid | EPA | C20H30O2 |
|
The screened anions used in this study.
| No. | Anions/Abbreviations | Chemical Structure |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chloride [Cl] | Cl− |
| 2 | Bromide [Br] | Br− |
| 3 | Tetrafluoroborate [BF4] |
|
| 4 | Hexafluorophosphate [PF6] |
|
| 5 | Nitrate [NO3] |
|
| 6 | Dicyanamide [DCN] |
|
| 7 | Diethylphosphate [C4H10O4P] |
|
| 8 | Tetrachloro aluminate [AlCl4] |
|
| 9 | Methyl sulfate [CH4O4S] |
|
| 10 | Thiocyanate [SCN] |
|
| 11 | Methane sulfonate [C2H6O3S] |
|
| 12 | Ethyl sulfate [C2H6O4S] |
|
| 13 | Benzoate [C7H5O2] |
|
| 14 | Sulfate [SO4] |
|
| 15 | Hydrogen sulphate [HSO4] |
|
| 16 | Dimethyl phosphate [C2H7O4P] |
|
| 17 | Propanoate [C3H5O2] |
|
| 18 | Toluene-4-Sulfonate [C7H7O3S] |
|
| 19 | Tri fluoro methane-Sulfonate [CF3SO3] |
|
| 20 | Bis(Trifluoromethyl)Imide [NHC2F6] |
|
| 21 | Trifluoroacetate [CF3CO2] |
|
| 22 | Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide [TF2N] |
|
The screened cations used in this study.
| No. | Cations/Abbreviations | Chemical Structures |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium [EMIM] |
|
| 2 | 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium [BMIM] |
|
| 3 | 1-hexyl-3-methyl imidazolium [HMIM] |
|
| 4 | 1-octyl-3-methyl imidazolium [OMIM] |
|
| 5 | 1-ethyl-3-methyl pyridinium [EMPyr] |
|
| 6 | 1-butyl-3-methyl pyridinium [BMPyr] |
|
| 7 | 1-hexyl-3-methyl pyridinium [HMPyr] |
|
| 8 | 1-octhyl-3-methyl pyridinium [OMPyr] |
|
| 9 | 1-butyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium [BMPyrro] |
|
| 10 | 1-ethyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium [EMPyrro] |
|
| 11 | 1-hexyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium [HMPyrro] |
|
| 12 | 1-methyl-1-octyl pyrrolidinium [MOPyrro] |
|
| 13 | 1-butyl-1-methyl piperidinium [BMPIP] |
|
| 14 | 1-hexyl-1-methyl piperidinium [HMPIP] |
|
| 15 | 1-methyl-1-propyl piperidinium [MPPIP] |
|
| 16 | Tetra-methyl ammonium [TMAm] |
|