| Literature DB >> 32781499 |
Shiva Rezaei Motlagh1, Razif Harun1, Dayang Radiah Awang Biak1, Siti Aslina Hussain1, Amal A Elgharbawy2, Ramin Khezri3, Cecilia Devi Wilfred4.
Abstract
This study performs a screening of potential Ionic Liquids (ILs) for the extraction of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) compounds by the calculation of capacity values. For this purpose, a Conductor-Like Screening Model for Real Solvents (COSMO-RS) was employed to study the molecular structures of the ILs, and therefore, predict their extraction potential. The capacity values of 22 anions combined with 16 cations based ILs, were investigated to evaluate the effectiveness of ILs in the extraction of DHA. It was found that among the investigated ILs, a combination of tetramethyl ammonium with SO4 or Cl was the best fit for DHA extraction, followed by pyrrolidinium, imidazolium, pyridinium and piperidinium. Furthermore, it was observed that the extraction capacity and the selectivity of ILs decreased with an increase in alkyl chain length; therefore, ethyl chain-ILs, with the shortest chain lengths, were found to be most suitable for DHA extraction. The predicted results were validated through the experimentally calculated extraction yield of a DHA compound from Nannochloropsis sp. Microalgae. Five selected ILs, namely [EMIM][Cl], [BMIM][Cl], [TMAm][Cl], [EMPyr][Br] and [EMPyrro][Br], were selected from COSMO-RS for empirical extraction purposes, and the validation results pinpointed the good prediction capabilities of COSMO-RS. The findings in this study can simplify the process of selecting suitable ILs for DHA extraction and reduce the number of required empirical evaluations.Entities:
Keywords: COSMO-RS; DHA; extraction; infinite dilution capacity value; ionic liquids; omega-3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32781499 PMCID: PMC7464090 DOI: 10.3390/biom10081149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1COSMO-RS calculation steps for solid–liquid extraction.
The chemical structure and formula of the DHA molecule.
| Shorthand Sign | Synthetic Name | Trivial Name | Formula | Chemical Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C22:6 | docosahexaenoic acid | DHA | C22H32O2 |
|
Classification of anion- and cation-based ILs utilized in this study.
| Anions | Cations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Cl] − | Chloride | 1 | [TMAm] + | Tetramethyl ammonium |
| 2 | [Br] − | Bromide | 2 | [EMIM]+ | 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium |
| 3 | [BF4] − | Tetrafluoroborate | 3 | [BMIM] + | 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium |
| 4 | [PF6] − | Hexafluorophosphate | 4 | [HMIM] + | 1-hexyl-3-methyl imidazolium |
| 5 | [NO3] − | Nitrate | 5 | [OMIM] + | 1-octyl-3-methyl imidazolium |
| 6 | [DCN] − | Dicyanamide | 6 | [EMPyrro] + | 1-ethyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium |
| 7 | [SCN] − | Thiocyanate | 7 | [BMPyrro] + | 1-butyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium |
| 8 | [AlCl4] − | Tetrachloro aluminate | 8 | [HMPyrro] + | 1-hexyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium |
| 9 | [C2H7PO4] − | Dimethyl phosphate | 9 | [MOPyrro] + | 1-methyl-1-octyl pyrrolidinium |
| 10 | [C4H11PO4] − | Diethyl phosphate | 10 | [EMPyr] + | 1-ethyl-3-methyl pyridinium |
| 11 | [C7H5O2] − | Benzoate | 11 | [BMPyr] + | 1-butyl-3-methyl pyridinium |
| 12 | [C2H6SO3] − | Methane sulfonate | 12 | [HMPyr] + | 1-hexyl-3-methyl pyridinium |
| 13 | [C7H7SO3] − | Toluene-4-Sulfonate | 13 | [OMPyr] + | 1-octhyl-3-methyl pyridinium |
| 14 | [CF3SO3] − | Trifluoro methane-Sulfonate | 14 | [MPPIP] + | 1-methyl-1-propyl piperidinium |
| 15 | [SO4] − | Sulfate | 15 | [BMPIP] + | 1-butyl-1-methyl piperidinium |
| 16 | [HSO4] − | Hydrogen sulfate | 16 | [HMPIP] + | 1-hexyl-1-methyl piperidinium |
| 17 | [EtSO4]− | Ethyl sulfate | |||
| 18 | [MeSO4] − | Methyl sulfate | |||
| 19 | [C3H5O2]− | Propanoate | |||
| 20 | [NHC2F6] − | Bis(trifluoromethyl)imide | |||
| 21 | [CF3CO2] − | Trifluoro acetate | |||
| 22 | [TF2N] − | Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide | |||
Figure 2Schematic of experimental setup of lipid and DHA extraction from microalgae biomass.
Figure 3(a) Optimized molecular structure of DHA and (b) σ-surface of DHA compound performed by COSMOtherm.
Figure 4Net surface charge of DHA in terms of (a) σ-profiles and (b) σ-potential.
Figure 5COSMO-RS-predicted infinite dilution capacity values (Y axis) of ILs including: (a) Imidazolium-, (b) Pyridinium-, (c) Pyrrolidinium-, (d) Piperidinium- and (e) Teramethyl ammonium-based cation alkyl chain lengths with 22 anions (X axis) at 25 °C for DHA extraction.
Figure 6Proposed hydrogen bonding between the IL and DHA; (a,b) Suggested hydrogen bonding between the SO42− and DHA during extraction, (c): DHA and Tetramethyl ammonium sulfate, (d) DHA and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, in aqueous-IL solution.
Figure 7Comparison of the capacity values of selected ILs for the extraction of DHA compounds predicted by COSMO-RS and the experimental DHA extraction yield (mg/g) from Nannochloropsis sp. microalgal.