BACKGROUND: Diabetes management apps may have positive effects on diabetes self-management. It remains unclear, however, which app features are particularly effective and encourage sustained app usage. Behavior change techniques (BCTs) and gamification are promising approaches to improve user engagement. However, little is known about the frequency BCTs and gamification techniques (GTs) are actually used. This app review aims to provide an overview of BCTs and GTs in current diabetes management apps. METHODS: Google's Play Store was searched for applications using a broad search strategy (keyword: "diabetes"). We limited our research to freely available apps. A total of 56 apps matched the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in terms of the features they offer to support self-management. We used a taxonomy comprising 29 BCTs and 17 GTs to evaluate the applications. Two independent raters tested and evaluated each app. RESULTS: Interrater agreement was high (ICC = .75 for BCTs; ICC = .90 for GTs). An average of 7.4 BCTs (SD = 3.1) and an average of 1.4 out of 17 GTs (SD = 1.6) were implemented in each app. Five out of 29 BCTs accounted for 55.8% of the BCTs identified in total. The GT most often identified was "feedback" and accounted for 50% of the GTs. CONCLUSIONS: The potential of BCTs and GTs in diabetes management apps has not been fully exploited yet. Only very restricted sets of BCTs and gamification features were implemented. Systematic research on the efficacy of specific BCTs and GTs is needed to provide further guidance for app design.
BACKGROUND:Diabetes management apps may have positive effects on diabetes self-management. It remains unclear, however, which app features are particularly effective and encourage sustained app usage. Behavior change techniques (BCTs) and gamification are promising approaches to improve user engagement. However, little is known about the frequency BCTs and gamification techniques (GTs) are actually used. This app review aims to provide an overview of BCTs and GTs in current diabetes management apps. METHODS: Google's Play Store was searched for applications using a broad search strategy (keyword: "diabetes"). We limited our research to freely available apps. A total of 56 apps matched the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in terms of the features they offer to support self-management. We used a taxonomy comprising 29 BCTs and 17 GTs to evaluate the applications. Two independent raters tested and evaluated each app. RESULTS: Interrater agreement was high (ICC = .75 for BCTs; ICC = .90 for GTs). An average of 7.4 BCTs (SD = 3.1) and an average of 1.4 out of 17 GTs (SD = 1.6) were implemented in each app. Five out of 29 BCTs accounted for 55.8% of the BCTs identified in total. The GT most often identified was "feedback" and accounted for 50% of the GTs. CONCLUSIONS: The potential of BCTs and GTs in diabetes management apps has not been fully exploited yet. Only very restricted sets of BCTs and gamification features were implemented. Systematic research on the efficacy of specific BCTs and GTs is needed to provide further guidance for app design.
Authors: Charlene C Quinn; Michelle D Shardell; Michael L Terrin; Erik A Barr; Shoshana H Ballew; Ann L Gruber-Baldini Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Maged N Kamel Boulos; Shauna Gammon; Mavis C Dixon; Sandra M MacRury; Michael J Fergusson; Francisco Miranda Rodrigues; Telmo Mourinho Baptista; Stephen P Yang Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: E A Edwards; J Lumsden; C Rivas; L Steed; L A Edwards; A Thiyagarajan; R Sohanpal; H Caton; C J Griffiths; M R Munafò; S Taylor; R T Walton Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: A Geirhos; M Stephan; M Wehrle; C Mack; E-M Messner; A Schmitt; H Baumeister; Y Terhorst; L B Sander Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Enying Gong; Shaira Baptista; Anthony Russell; Paul Scuffham; Michaela Riddell; Jane Speight; Dominique Bird; Emily Williams; Mojtaba Lotfaliany; Brian Oldenburg Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 5.428