Omar El-Gayar1, Prem Timsina, Nevine Nawar, Wael Eid. 1. College of Business and Information Systems, Dakota State University, Madison, South Dakota 57402, USA. Omar.El-Gayar@dsu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advancements in smartphone technology coupled with the proliferation of data connectivity has resulted in increased interest and unprecedented growth in mobile applications for diabetes self-management. The objective of this article is to determine, in a systematic review, whether diabetes applications have been helping patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes self-manage their condition and to identify issues necessary for large-scale adoption of such interventions. METHODS: The review covers commercial applications available on the Apple App Store (as a representative of commercially available applications) and articles published in relevant databases covering a period from January 1995 to August 2012. The review included all applications supporting any diabetes self-management task where the patient is the primary actor. RESULTS: Available applications support self-management tasks such as physical exercise, insulin dosage or medication, blood glucose testing, and diet. Other support tasks considered include decision support, notification/alert, tagging of input data, and integration with social media. The review points to the potential for mobile applications to have a positive impact on diabetes self-management. Analysis indicates that application usage is associated with improved attitudes favorable to diabetes self-management. Limitations of the applications include lack of personalized feedback; usability issues, particularly the ease of data entry; and integration with patients and electronic health records. CONCLUSIONS: Research into the adoption and use of user-centered and sociotechnical design principles is needed to improve usability, perceived usefulness, and, ultimately, adoption of the technology. Proliferation and efficacy of interventions involving mobile applications will benefit from a holistic approach that takes into account patients' expectations and providers' needs.
BACKGROUND: Advancements in smartphone technology coupled with the proliferation of data connectivity has resulted in increased interest and unprecedented growth in mobile applications for diabetes self-management. The objective of this article is to determine, in a systematic review, whether diabetes applications have been helping patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes self-manage their condition and to identify issues necessary for large-scale adoption of such interventions. METHODS: The review covers commercial applications available on the Apple App Store (as a representative of commercially available applications) and articles published in relevant databases covering a period from January 1995 to August 2012. The review included all applications supporting any diabetes self-management task where the patient is the primary actor. RESULTS: Available applications support self-management tasks such as physical exercise, insulin dosage or medication, blood glucose testing, and diet. Other support tasks considered include decision support, notification/alert, tagging of input data, and integration with social media. The review points to the potential for mobile applications to have a positive impact on diabetes self-management. Analysis indicates that application usage is associated with improved attitudes favorable to diabetes self-management. Limitations of the applications include lack of personalized feedback; usability issues, particularly the ease of data entry; and integration with patients and electronic health records. CONCLUSIONS: Research into the adoption and use of user-centered and sociotechnical design principles is needed to improve usability, perceived usefulness, and, ultimately, adoption of the technology. Proliferation and efficacy of interventions involving mobile applications will benefit from a holistic approach that takes into account patients' expectations and providers' needs.
Authors: Lynne T Harris; James Tufano; Tung Le; Courtney Rees; Ginny A Lewis; Alison B Evert; Jan Flowers; Carol Collins; James Hoath; Irl B Hirsch; Harold I Goldberg; James D Ralston Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Y Ma; B C Olendzki; D Chiriboga; M Rosal; E Sinagra; S Crawford; A R Hafner; S L Pagoto; R P Magner; I S Ockene Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-05-17 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Courtney Rees Lyles; Lynne T Harris; Tung Le; Jan Flowers; James Tufano; Diane Britt; James Hoath; Irl B Hirsch; Harold I Goldberg; James D Ralston Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Martha M Funnell; Tammy L Brown; Belinda P Childs; Linda B Haas; Gwen M Hosey; Brian Jensen; Melinda Maryniuk; Mark Peyrot; John D Piette; Diane Reader; Linda M Siminerio; Katie Weinger; Michael A Weiss Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Alexander Kollmann; Michaela Riedl; Peter Kastner; Guenter Schreier; Bernhard Ludvik Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Timothy S Bailey; Jane F Wallace; Scott Pardo; Mary Ellen Warchal-Windham; Bern Harrison; Robert Morin; Mark Christiansen Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Jane E Hirst; Lucy Mackillop; Lise Loerup; Dev A Kevat; Katy Bartlett; Oliver Gibson; Yvonne Kenworthy; Jonathan C Levy; Lionel Tarassenko; Andrew Farmer Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2014-10-30
Authors: Seung Ho Lee; Huiyan Piao; Yong Chan Cho; Se-Na Kim; Goeun Choi; Cho Rim Kim; Han Bi Ji; Chun Gwon Park; Cheol Lee; Chong In Shin; Won-Gun Koh; Young Bin Choy; Jin-Ho Choy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 11.205