Literature DB >> 30753520

Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- and post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets1.

Anne M S Huting1, Panagiotis Sakkas1, Ilias Kyriazakis1.   

Abstract

To improve the performance of lightweight piglets during suckling, producers are advised to create uniform litters using young sows. However, fostering piglets to primiparous sows may confer penalties due to their lower milk yield and milk immunoglobulin concentrations compared with multiparous sows. The objective was to determine the effect of foster sow parity (primiparous (F), second (S), and mid parity (M: parity 3 to 5)) on the performance from birth to day 68 of piglets born light (L: ≤1.25 kg) or heavy (H: 1.50-2.00 kg) and on creep feed consumption. Piglets (n = 507) considered L or H were cross-fostered, creating litters of 13 similar-sized piglets/litter and were randomly fostered to one of the foster parities. All litters were offered creep feed with a green dye to discern between consumers and nonconsumers, and the medication administered was recorded. Medication administrated pre- and postweaning did not differ (P > 0.05) across the different experimental groups. A significantly (P ≤ 0.025) lower number of H piglets were removed as a result of preweaning weight loss from F and S, rather than M litters. The interaction between birth weight and foster parity only affected piglet BW at day 10 (P = 0.020); foster parity did not influence BW of L piglets, but influenced that of H piglets. H piglets in F and M litters (3.82 and 3.80 kg) were significantly lighter (P ≤ 0.013) than H piglets in S litters (4.15 kg). As expected, L piglets performed worse pre- and postweaning than H piglets; they were 4.50 kg lighter at day 68. Foster parity significantly affected BW: F piglets were weaned lighter (P = 0.004) than S and M piglets (7.52 vs. 8.02 kg). Postweaning (day 68) however, F piglets achieved similar BW as S piglets (29.7 vs. 29.9 kg), whereas M piglets performed best (31.2 kg, P ≤ 0.079). Significantly fewer (almost none) of the L than the H piglets consumed creep feed (P < 0.001); significantly (P = 0.007) more F and M piglets were considered consumers than S piglets. The results suggest that irrespectively of birth weight, piglets tend to perform better when in M litters, being weaned heavy and having a high creep feed intake; however, more piglets are removed from such litters preweaning. Although S litters were weaned heavy, they were unable to maintain this BW advantage postweaning, due to their low creep feed intake and F litters remained small throughout. Long-term performance monitoring to slaughter is recommended.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  creep feed; lightweight piglets; pigs; sow parity; teat position; weaning weight

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30753520      PMCID: PMC6447253          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  29 in total

1.  Early identification of neonates at risk: traits of newborn piglets with respect to survival.

Authors:  M Tuchscherer; B Puppe; A Tuchscherer; U Tiemann
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Growth of nursing pigs related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands.

Authors:  S W Kim; W L Hurley; I K Hant; R A Easter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of creep feed consumption on individual feed intake characteristics and performance of group-housed weanling pigs.

Authors:  E M A M Bruininx; G P Binnendijk; C M C van der Peet-Schwering; J W Schrama; L A den Hartog; H Everts; A C Beynen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Predicting milk yield and composition in lactating sows: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  A V Hansen; A B Strathe; E Kebreab; J France; P K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Ultrasonographic and gross pathological findings in the mammary glands of weaned sows having suffered recidiving mastitis metritis agalactia.

Authors:  C Baer; G Bilkei
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.005

6.  Effects of suckling intensity on milk yield and piglet growth from lactation-enhanced gilts.

Authors:  K M Marshall; W L Hurley; R D Shanks; M B Wheeler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Investigating the behavioural and physiological indicators of neonatal survival in pigs.

Authors:  E M Baxter; S Jarvis; R B D'Eath; D W Ross; S K Robson; M Farish; I M Nevison; A B Lawrence; S A Edwards
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Effects of varying creep feeding duration on the proportion of pigs consuming creep feed and neonatal pig performance.

Authors:  R C Sulabo; M D Tokach; S S Dritz; R D Goodband; J M DeRouchey; J L Nelssen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs.

Authors:  G R Foxcroft; W T Dixon; S Novak; C T Putman; S C Town; M D A Vinsky
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effects of dietary energy intake during gestation and lactation on milk yield and composition of first, second and fourth parity sows.

Authors:  Manfred Beyer; Werner Jentsch; Siegfried Kuhla; Hildegard Wittenburg; Fred Kreienbring; Helmut Scholze; Paul E Rudolph; Cornelia C Metges
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.242

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dam parity structure and body condition during lactation influence piglet growth and gilt sexual maturation through pre-finishing.

Authors:  Lea A Rempel; Brittney N Keel; William T Oliver; James E Wells; Clay A Lents; Dan J Nonneman; Gary A Rohrer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Changes in Faecal Microbiota Profiles Associated With Performance and Birthweight of Piglets.

Authors:  Clare H Gaukroger; Christopher J Stewart; Sandra A Edwards; John Walshaw; Ian P Adams; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Feed intake of the sow and playful creep feeding of piglets influence piglet behaviour and performance before and after weaning.

Authors:  Anouschka Middelkoop; Natasja Costermans; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Antagonistic maternal and direct effects of the leptin receptor gene on body weight in pigs.

Authors:  Emma Solé; Roger Ros-Freixedes; Marc Tor; Josep Reixach; Ramona N Pena; Joan Estany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of early-life feeding on local intestinal microbiota and digestive system development in piglets.

Authors:  R Choudhury; A Middelkoop; J G de Souza; L A van Veen; W J J Gerrits; B Kemp; J E Bolhuis; M Kleerebezem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Using Nutritional Strategies to Shape the Gastro-Intestinal Tracts of Suckling and Weaned Piglets.

Authors:  Anne M S Huting; Anouschka Middelkoop; Xiaonan Guan; Francesc Molist
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.