Literature DB >> 16582081

The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs.

G R Foxcroft1, W T Dixon, S Novak, C T Putman, S C Town, M D A Vinsky.   

Abstract

The main purpose of this review is to discuss associations between within-litter variation in birth weight, and preweaning survival and postnatal growth in the pig, as the basis for suggesting that the developmental competence of pigs born, as well as the size of the litter, need critical consideration. Extremes of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) occur within a discrete subset of fetuses, substantially smaller than their littermates and commonly described as runt piglets. The lower preweaning growth of runt pigs cannot be entirely explained based on their lower birth weight, nor do they show full postnatal compensatory growth. Interestingly, this more complex reprogramming of development in runt pigs can already be identified by d 27 to 35 of gestation. Recently, we reported more universal IUGR effects in commercial dam-line sows, as an indirect response to selection for increased litter size. High ovulation rates (>30 ovulations) in a proportion of greater parity sows are associated with increased numbers of conceptuses surviving to d 30 of gestation, resulting in detrimental effects on placental development of uterine crowding in the early postimplantation period. In turn, this limits nutrient availability to the embryo during a critical period of myogenesis. Consequently, although a reduction in the number of conceptuses occurs by d 50, placental development in the surviving fetuses remains compromised, resulting in IUGR and reduced numbers of muscle fibers at d 90 and at birth, in all surviving littermates. These effects of uterine crowding on fetal and postnatal development are analogous to the detrimental effects of nutritional restriction in gestating sows on fetal myogenesis, birth weight, and postnatal growth. The incompatibility between increased numbers of conceptuses surviving to the postimplantation period, in the absence of increased uterine capacity, offers a biological explanation for increased variability in birth weight and postnatal growth performance reported in greater parity sows. We conclude that a strategy of introducing hyperprolific females into the breeding nucleus, as a means of increasing the numbers of pigs born, needs to be critically evaluated in the context of the overall efficiency of pork production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16582081     DOI: 10.2527/2006.8413_supple105x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  65 in total

Review 1.  ASAS-SSR Triennnial Reproduction Symposium: Looking Back and Moving Forward-How Reproductive Physiology has Evolved: Fetal origins of impaired muscle growth and metabolic dysfunction: Lessons from the heat-stressed pregnant ewe.

Authors:  Dustin T Yates; Jessica L Petersen; Ty B Schmidt; Caitlin N Cadaret; Taylor L Barnes; Robert J Posont; Kristin A Beede
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Within-litter variation in birth weight: impact of nutritional status in the sow.

Authors:  Tao-lin Yuan; Yu-hua Zhu; Meng Shi; Tian-tian Li; Na Li; Guo-yao Wu; Fuller W Bazer; Jian-jun Zang; Feng-lai Wang; Jun-jun Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- and post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets1.

Authors:  Anne M S Huting; Panagiotis Sakkas; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effects of increased energy and amino acid intake in late gestation on reproductive performance, milk composition, metabolic, and redox status of sows1.

Authors:  Lianqiang Che; Liang Hu; Ceng Wu; Qin Xu; Qiang Zhou; Xie Peng; Zengfeng Fang; Yan Lin; Shenyu Xu; Bin Feng; Jian Li; Jiayong Tang; Reinan Zhang; Hua Li; Peter Kappel Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of daily fluctuations in ambient temperature on reproductive failure traits of Landrace and Yorkshire sows under Thai tropical environmental conditions.

Authors:  Teerapong Jaichansukkit; Thanathip Suwanasopee; Skorn Koonawootrittriron; Padet Tummaruk; Mauricio A Elzo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Impact of feed intake during late gestation on piglet birth weight and reproductive performance: a dose-response study performed in gilts.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Elisar Camilotti; Deivison P Fagundes; Carlos E Vier; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Márcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Felipe B Betiolo; Elisar Camilloti; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Ivo Wentz; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Marcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Supplementation with rumen-protected L-arginine-HCl increased fertility in sheep with synchronized estrus.

Authors:  Julio Agustín Ruiz de Chávez; Adrian Guzmán; Diana Zamora-Gutiérrez; Germán David Mendoza; Luz María Melgoza; Sergio Montes; Ana María Rosales-Torres
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  MicroRNA transcriptome profiles during swine skeletal muscle development.

Authors:  Tara G McDaneld; Timothy P L Smith; Matthew E Doumit; Jeremy R Miles; Luiz L Coutinho; Tad S Sonstegard; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; Dan J Nonneman; Ralph T Wiedmann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Detection of differentially expressed genes between Erhualian and Large White placentas on day 75 and 90 of gestation.

Authors:  Quan-Yong Zhou; Ming-Di Fang; Ting-Hua Huang; Chang-Chun Li; Mei Yu; Shu-Hong Zhao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.