Literature DB >> 10834588

Growth of nursing pigs related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands.

S W Kim1, W L Hurley, I K Hant, R A Easter.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine growth performance of nursing pigs in relationship to teat order and to observe teat preference by pigs. In the first experiment, litter size of 13 primiparous sows was adjusted to 9 (8.7 +/- 1.5) pigs and teat order of each litter was observed on the day before slaughter. Another group of eight sows was killed on d 0 (within 12 h after farrowing). In the second experiment, litter size was adjusted to 9 (8.9 +/- 1.4) pigs for 20 primiparous sows and teat order for each litter was observed 1 d before slaughter. The weights of sows and individual pigs were recorded at farrowing, weekly, and on the day before slaughter. Mammary glands were collected at slaughter on d 21 of lactation and trimmed of skin and the extraneous fat pad. Individual glands were separated, weighed, and ground for measurement of dry matter, dry fat-free tissue, protein, fat, ash, and DNA contents. Middle mammary glands had the greatest wet weight among glands obtained within 12 h after weaning (P < .05). For sows completing the 21 d lactation, only glands known to have been nursed were included in the data sets. Greater than 60% of the first four pairs of mammary glands were nursed, and less than 40% of the seventh and eighth glands were nursed by pigs during lactation. Pigs that nursed the first five pairs of anterior glands gained faster than pigs nursing the remaining glands. The first five pairs of anterior glands had greater wet and dry weights, and greater protein and DNA contents compared with the remaining glands. Pigs that nursed heavier glands gained weight faster (r = .68, P = .0001), and those heavier glands contained greater amounts of protein (r = .98, P = .0001) and DNA (r = .66, P = .0001). Variation in weight gain of pigs nursing the anterior and middle glands was not statistically significant. The functional superiority of anterior and middle glands was positively correlated with body weight gain of nursing pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10834588     DOI: 10.2527/2000.7851313x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

Review 1.  Within-litter variation in birth weight: impact of nutritional status in the sow.

Authors:  Tao-lin Yuan; Yu-hua Zhu; Meng Shi; Tian-tian Li; Na Li; Guo-yao Wu; Fuller W Bazer; Jian-jun Zang; Feng-lai Wang; Jun-jun Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- and post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets1.

Authors:  Anne M S Huting; Panagiotis Sakkas; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  What is good for small piglets might not be good for big piglets: The consequences of cross-fostering and creep feed provision on performance to slaughter.

Authors:  A M S Huting; K Almond; I Wellock; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Nutritional impact on mammary development in pigs: a review.

Authors:  Chantal Farmer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Composition and physiological functions of the porcine colostrum.

Authors:  Ryo Inoue; Takamitsu Tsukahara
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.974

6.  Effects of supplementing sow diets with fermented corn and soybean meal mixed feed during lactation on the performance of sows and progeny.

Authors:  C Wang; C Lin; W Su; Y Zhang; F Wang; Y Wang; C Shi; Z Lu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  A dynamic mammary gland model describing colostrum immunoglobulin transfer and milk production in lactating sows.

Authors:  Uffe Krogh; Hélène Quesnel; Nathalie Le Floch; Aude Simongiovanni; Jaap van Milgen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Improving efficiency of sow productivity: nutrition and health.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kim; Alexandra C Weaver; Yan Bin Shen; Yan Zhao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-26

9.  Regulation of amino acid transporters in the mammary gland from late pregnancy to peak lactation in the sow.

Authors:  Fang Chen; Shihai Zhang; Zixiao Deng; Qiqi Zhou; Lin Cheng; Sung Woo Kim; Jun Chen; Wutai Guan
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-08

10.  Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium co-fermented feed regulates lactating sow's performance, immune status and gut microbiota.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Siyu Wei; Bocheng Xu; Lihong Hao; Weifa Su; Mingliang Jin; Yizhen Wang
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.