Literature DB >> 30747591

Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.

Hui Li1, Kayla R Mendel1, Li Lan1, Deepa Sheth1, Maryellen L Giger1.   

Abstract

Background Previous studies have suggested that breast parenchymal texture features may reflect the biologic risk factors associated with breast cancer development. Therefore, combining the characteristics of normal parenchyma from the contralateral breast with radiomic features of breast tumors may improve the accuracy of digital mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Purpose To determine whether the addition of radiomic analysis of contralateral breast parenchyma to the characterization of breast lesions with digital mammography improves lesion classification over that with radiomic tumor features alone. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study included 182 patients (age range, 25-90 years; mean age, 55.9 years ± 14.9) who underwent mammography between June 2002 and July 2009. There were 106 malignant and 76 benign lesions. Automatic lesion segmentation and radiomic analysis were performed for each breast lesion. Radiomic texture analysis was applied in the normal regions of interest in the contralateral breast parenchyma to assess the mammographic parenchymal patterns. The classification performance of both individual features and the output from a Bayesian artificial neural network classifier was evaluated with the leave-one-patient-out method by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the figure of merit in the task of differentiating between malignant and benign lesions. Results The performance of the combined lesion and parenchyma classifier in the differentiation between malignant and benign mammographic lesions was better than that with the lesion features alone (AUC = 0.84 ± 0.03 vs 0.79 ± 0.03, respectively; P = .047). Overall, six radiomic features-spiculation, margin sharpness, size, circularity from the tumor feature set, and skewness and power law beta from the parenchymal feature set-were selected more than 50% of the time during the feature selection process on the combined feature set. Conclusion Combining quantitative radiomic data from tumors with contralateral parenchyma characterizations may improve diagnostic accuracy for breast cancer. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Shaffer in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30747591      PMCID: PMC6445042          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  33 in total

1.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.

Authors:  Z Huo; M L Giger; D E Wolverton; W Zhong; S Cumming; O I Olopade
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The "seed and soil" hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Isaiah J Fidler; George Poste
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; M Szklo
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 4.  Stromal effects on mammary gland development and breast cancer.

Authors:  Bryony S Wiseman; Zena Werb
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images.

Authors:  J W Byng; N F Boyd; L Little; G Lockwood; E Fishell; R A Jong; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Yading Yuan; Weijie Chen; Karla Horsch; Li Lan; Andrew R Jamieson; Charlene A Sennett; Sanaz A Jansen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications?

Authors:  Jacques Brisson; Caroline Diorio; Benoît Mâsse
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  17 in total

1.  Mammography-based radiomics for predicting the risk of breast cancer recurrence: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ning Mao; Ping Yin; Haicheng Zhang; Kun Zhang; Xicheng Song; Dong Xing; Tongpeng Chu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Personalized statistical learning algorithms to improve the early detection of cancer using longitudinal biomarkers.

Authors:  Nabihah Tayob; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 3.  Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Qiyuan Hu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.947

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Geras; Ritse M Mann; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in high-grade osteosarcoma: added value of non-tumorous bone radiomics using CT images.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Pengfei Yang; Kun Hu; Yan Wu; Meng Xu-Welliver; Yidong Wan; Chen Luo; Jing Wang; Jinhua Wang; Jiale Qin; Yi Rong; Tianye Niu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

Review 6.  Application of Noninvasive Imaging to Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Breast Cancer: Facts and Future.

Authors:  Zhongquan Cheng; Yang Du; Leyi Yu; Zhu Yuan; Jie Tian
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Integrated imaging and molecular analysis to decipher tumor microenvironment in the era of immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Aaron T Mayer; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 17.012

Review 8.  Radiomics in Breast Imaging from Techniques to Clinical Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Seung Hak Lee; Hyunjin Park; Eun Sook Ko
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Multi-marker quantitative radiomics for mass characterization in dedicated breast CT imaging.

Authors:  Marco Caballo; Domenico R Pangallo; Wendelien Sanderink; Andrew M Hernandez; Su Hyun Lyu; Filippo Molinari; John M Boone; Ritse M Mann; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Diagnostic performance of perilesional radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Simin Wang; Yuqi Sun; Ruimin Li; Ning Mao; Qin Li; Tingting Jiang; Qianqian Chen; Shaofeng Duan; Haizhu Xie; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.