Literature DB >> 31549948

Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Krzysztof J Geras1, Ritse M Mann1, Linda Moy1.   

Abstract

Although computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is widely used in mammography, conventional CAD programs that use prompts to indicate potential cancers on the mammograms have not led to an improvement in diagnostic accuracy. Because of the advances in machine learning, especially with use of deep (multilayered) convolutional neural networks, artificial intelligence has undergone a transformation that has improved the quality of the predictions of the models. Recently, such deep learning algorithms have been applied to mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). In this review, the authors explain how deep learning works in the context of mammography and DBT and define the important technical challenges. Subsequently, they discuss the current status and future perspectives of artificial intelligence-based clinical applications for mammography, DBT, and radiomics. Available algorithms are advanced and approach the performance of radiologists-especially for cancer detection and risk prediction at mammography. However, clinical validation is largely lacking, and it is not clear how the power of deep learning should be used to optimize practice. Further development of deep learning models is necessary for DBT, and this requires collection of larger databases. It is expected that deep learning will eventually have an important role in DBT, including the generation of synthetic images. © RSNA, 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549948      PMCID: PMC6822772          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  112 in total

1.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.

Authors:  L J Warren Burhenne; S A Wood; C J D'Orsi; S A Feig; D B Kopans; K F O'Shaughnessy; E A Sickles; L Tabar; C J Vyborny; R A Castellino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.

Authors:  Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge; Jiazheng Shi; Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Lessons Learned From Reviewing Breast Imaging Malpractice Cases.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kagan Arleo; Marwa Saleh; Ruth Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Editor's Note: Publication of AI Research in Radiology.

Authors:  David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.

Authors:  Robyn L Birdwell; Parul Bandodkar; Debra M Ikeda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes.

Authors:  Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Carol Yim-Lui Cheung; Gilbert Lim; Gavin Siew Wei Tan; Nguyen D Quang; Alfred Gan; Haslina Hamzah; Renata Garcia-Franco; Ian Yew San Yeo; Shu Yen Lee; Edmund Yick Mun Wong; Charumathi Sabanayagam; Mani Baskaran; Farah Ibrahim; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Eric A Finkelstein; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Ian Y Wong; Neil M Bressler; Sobha Sivaprasad; Rohit Varma; Jost B Jonas; Ming Guang He; Ching-Yu Cheng; Gemmy Chui Ming Cheung; Tin Aung; Wynne Hsu; Mong Li Lee; Tien Yin Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

Authors:  T W Freer; M J Ulissey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Edward A Sickles; Carl D'Orsi; Eric A Berns; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; William E Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Precision Medicine and Radiogenomics in Breast Cancer: New Approaches toward Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Joanne Chin; Amy N Melsaether; Elizabeth A Morris; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  46 in total

1.  Consensus Reads: The More Sets of Eyes Interpreting a Mammogram, the Better for Women.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: impact on the radiography profession.

Authors:  Maryann Hardy; Hugh Harvey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  An interpretable classifier for high-resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization.

Authors:  Yiqiu Shen; Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Kangning Liu; Sudarshini Tyagi; Laura Heacock; S Gene Kim; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?

Authors:  Sahar Mansour; Rasha Kamal; Lamiaa Hashem; Basma AlKalaawy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence: A Primer for Breast Imaging Radiologists.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2020-06-19

6.  The cost-effectiveness of adding tomosynthesis to mammography-based breast cancer screening: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Sonya Cressman; Colin Mar; Janette Sam; Lisa Kan; Caroline Lohrisch; John J Spinelli
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-04-22

7.  Independent External Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Automated Interpretation of Screening Mammography: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna W Anderson; M Luke Marinovich; Nehmat Houssami; Kathryn P Lowry; Joann G Elmore; Diana S M Buist; Solveig Hofvind; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation.

Authors:  Isaac S Chua; Michal Gaziel-Yablowitz; Zfania T Korach; Kenneth L Kehl; Nathan A Levitan; Yull E Arriaga; Gretchen P Jackson; David W Bates; Michael Hassett
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: primary care provider preferences.

Authors:  Nathaniel Hendrix; Brett Hauber; Christoph I Lee; Aasthaa Bansal; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Application of deep learning in the detection of breast lesions with four different breast densities.

Authors:  Hongmei Li; Jing Ye; Hao Liu; Yichuan Wang; Binbin Shi; Juan Chen; Aiping Kong; Qing Xu; Junhui Cai
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.