BACKGROUND: Biliary cannulation failure is a major problem during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. It remains unclear how duodenal papilla morphology affects biliary cannulation. Therefore, we proposed a new classification system for the duodenal papilla based on oral protrusion pattern (ratio of the length of the oral protrusion to the transverse diameter of the papilla) and papilla pattern. AIMS: To retrospectively compare biliary cannulation results with regard to classification and operator experience. METHODS: We analyzed 589 naïve major duodenal papillae. Our classification system comprised oral protrusion pattern, classified as small (Protrusion-S), regular (Protrusion-R), or large (Protrusion-L), and the papilla pattern, classified as annular (Papilla-A), unstructured (Papilla-U), longitudinal (Papilla-LO), isolated (Papilla-I), or gyrus (Papilla-G). Intra-evaluator concordance and the results of biliary cannulation were analyzed. RESULTS: The following oral protrusion pattern classifications were observed: Protrusion-S, 11.7%; Protrusion-R, 77.9%; and Protrusion-L, 10.4%. The following papilla patterns were observed: Papilla-A, 67.1%; Papilla-U, 7.0%; Papilla-LO, 7.5%; Papilla-I, 1.2%; Papilla-G, 15.6%; and unclassified, 1.7%. Intra-evaluator concordance value (Fleiss kappa) was 0.788 for oral protrusion pattern and 0.750 for papilla pattern. A logistic regression analysis of cannulations performed by an experienced endoscopist identified Protrusion-L as a significant risk factor for difficult cannulation (odds ratio 2.956; 95% confidence interval 1.115-7.84; p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis confirmed Protrusion-L as an independent risk factor for difficult biliary cannulation (odds ratio 3.772; 95% confidence interval 1.359-10.464; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a new general classification system for the duodenal papilla. Protrusion-L is a significant risk factor for difficult biliary duct cannulation.
BACKGROUND:Biliary cannulation failure is a major problem during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. It remains unclear how duodenal papilla morphology affects biliary cannulation. Therefore, we proposed a new classification system for the duodenal papilla based on oral protrusion pattern (ratio of the length of the oral protrusion to the transverse diameter of the papilla) and papilla pattern. AIMS: To retrospectively compare biliary cannulation results with regard to classification and operator experience. METHODS: We analyzed 589 naïve major duodenal papillae. Our classification system comprised oral protrusion pattern, classified as small (Protrusion-S), regular (Protrusion-R), or large (Protrusion-L), and the papilla pattern, classified as annular (Papilla-A), unstructured (Papilla-U), longitudinal (Papilla-LO), isolated (Papilla-I), or gyrus (Papilla-G). Intra-evaluator concordance and the results of biliary cannulation were analyzed. RESULTS: The following oral protrusion pattern classifications were observed: Protrusion-S, 11.7%; Protrusion-R, 77.9%; and Protrusion-L, 10.4%. The following papilla patterns were observed: Papilla-A, 67.1%; Papilla-U, 7.0%; Papilla-LO, 7.5%; Papilla-I, 1.2%; Papilla-G, 15.6%; and unclassified, 1.7%. Intra-evaluator concordance value (Fleiss kappa) was 0.788 for oral protrusion pattern and 0.750 for papilla pattern. A logistic regression analysis of cannulations performed by an experienced endoscopist identified Protrusion-L as a significant risk factor for difficult cannulation (odds ratio 2.956; 95% confidence interval 1.115-7.84; p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis confirmed Protrusion-L as an independent risk factor for difficult biliary cannulation (odds ratio 3.772; 95% confidence interval 1.359-10.464; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a new general classification system for the duodenal papilla. Protrusion-L is a significant risk factor for difficult biliary duct cannulation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ampulla of vater; Cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopic retrograde; Risk factors
Authors: Y Gotoh; K Tamada; T Tomiyama; S Wada; A Ohashi; Y Satoh; T Higashizawa; T Miyata; K Ido; K Sugano Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: B Joseph Elmunzer; James M Scheiman; Glen A Lehman; Amitabh Chak; Patrick Mosler; Peter D R Higgins; Rodney A Hayward; Joseph Romagnuolo; Grace H Elta; Stuart Sherman; Akbar K Waljee; Aparna Repaka; Matthew R Atkinson; Gregory A Cote; Richard S Kwon; Lee McHenry; Cyrus R Piraka; Erik J Wamsteker; James L Watkins; Sheryl J Korsnes; Suzette E Schmidt; Sarah M Turner; Sylvia Nicholson; Evan L Fogel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anthony T DeBenedet; B Joseph Elmunzer; Sean T McCarthy; Grace H Elta; Philip S Schoenfeld Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Pier Alberto Testoni; Alberto Mariani; Lars Aabakken; Marianna Arvanitakis; Erwan Bories; Guido Costamagna; Jacques Devière; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Marc Giovannini; Tibor Gyokeres; Michael Hafner; Jorma Halttunen; Cesare Hassan; Luis Lopes; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Tony C Tham; Andrea Tringali; Jeanin van Hooft; Earl J Williams Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Rachid Mohamed; B Cord Lethebe; Emmanuel Gonzalez-Moreno; Ahmed Kayal; Sydney Bass; Martin Cole; Christian Turbide; Millie Chau; Hannah F Koury; Darren R Brenner; Robert J Hilsden; B Joseph Elmunzer; Rajesh N Keswani; Sachin Wani; Steven J Heitman; Nauzer Forbes Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 4.584