Literature DB >> 33146812

Morphology of the major papilla predicts ERCP procedural outcomes and adverse events.

Rachid Mohamed1, B Cord Lethebe2, Emmanuel Gonzalez-Moreno1,3, Ahmed Kayal1,3, Sydney Bass1, Martin Cole1, Christian Turbide1, Millie Chau1, Hannah F Koury2, Darren R Brenner3,4,5, Robert J Hilsden1,3, B Joseph Elmunzer6, Rajesh N Keswani7, Sachin Wani8, Steven J Heitman1,3, Nauzer Forbes9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The morphology of the major papilla affects the difficulty of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but no associations with adverse events have previously been established. We aimed to assess whether papillary morphology predicts ERCP adverse events.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a prospective registry of patients undergoing ERCP for biliary indications. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), with secondary outcomes including other adverse events and procedural outcomes such as inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation, cannulation time, and attempts. Papillae were classified as normal (Type I), small or flat (Type II), bulging (Type IIIa), pendulous (Type IIIb), creased (Type IV), or peri-diverticular (Type D). Outcomes were ascertained prospectively at 30 days from index procedures.
RESULTS: A total of 637 patients with native papillae were included. Compared to Type I papillae, Type II and Type IIIb papillae were associated with PEP, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of 7.28 (95% confidence intervals, CI, 1.84-28.74) and 4.25 (95% CI 1.26-14.32), respectively. Type II and IIIb papillae were associated with significantly longer cannulation times by 5.37 (95% CI 2.39-8.35) and 4.01 (95% CI 1.72-6.30) minutes, respectively. Type IIIb papillae were associated with lower deep cannulation success (AOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.48).
CONCLUSION: Papillary morphology is an important factor influencing both ERCP success and outcomes. Understanding this is key for managing intraprocedural approaches and minimizing adverse events. PROSPECTIVE REGISTRY REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04259580.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile ducts; ERCP; Pancreatitis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33146812      PMCID: PMC8806980          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08136-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

Authors:  P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Small papilla: another risk factor for post-sphincterotomy perforation.

Authors:  M Matsushita; K Uchida; A Nishio; H Takakuwa; K Okazaki
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Glenn M Eisen; Lars Aabakken; Todd H Baron; Matt M Hutter; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Albert Nemcek; Bret T Petersen; John L Petrini; Irving M Pike; Linda Rabeneck; Joseph Romagnuolo; John J Vargo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Adverse events associated with ERCP.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Mouen A Khashab; V Raman Muthusamy; Ruben D Acosta; Deepak Agrawal; David H Bruining; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Robert D Fanelli; Ashley L Faulx; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Shivangi Kothari; Jenifer R Lightdale; Bashar J Qumseya; Aasma Shaukat; Amy Wang; Sachin B Wani; Julie Yang; John M DeWitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Macroscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla influences bile duct cannulation: a prospective multicenter study by the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy Study Group for ERCP.

Authors:  Erik Haraldsson; Leena Kylänpää; Juha Grönroos; Arto Saarela; Ervin Toth; Gunnar Qvigstad; Mari Hult; Outi Lindström; Simo Laine; Heikki Karjula; Truls Hauge; Riadh Sadik; Urban Arnelo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Masci; A Mariani; S Curioni; P A Testoni
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 8.  Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Yuhong Yuan; Majidah Bukhari; Grigorios I Leontiadis; Paul Moayyedi; Alan Barkun
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-16

9.  Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

Authors:  Pier Alberto Testoni; Alberto Mariani; Lars Aabakken; Marianna Arvanitakis; Erwan Bories; Guido Costamagna; Jacques Devière; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Marc Giovannini; Tibor Gyokeres; Michael Hafner; Jorma Halttunen; Cesare Hassan; Luis Lopes; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Tony C Tham; Andrea Tringali; Jeanin van Hooft; Earl J Williams
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Real-World Practice Patterns in the Era of Rectal Indomethacin for Prophylaxis Against Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Zachary L Smith; B Joseph Elmunzer; Gregory S Cooper; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.