Literature DB >> 23807804

Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

F Tse1, Y Yuan, P Moayyedi, G I Leontiadis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Cannulation techniques are recognized to be important in causing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, considerable controversy exists about the usefulness of the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique for the prevention of PEP. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique.
METHODS: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and abstracts from Digestive Disease Week and the United European Gastroenterology Week were searched up to February 2012 for RCTs comparing the guide wire-assisted ERCP cannulation technique with the conventional contrast-assisted ERCP cannulation technique. The risk of bias was assessed, and outcomes were pooled by meta-analysis (random-effects model). The primary outcome measure was PEP. Secondary outcome measures included severity of PEP, primary common bile duct (CBD) cannulation success, overall CBD cannulation success, precut sphincterotomy, and other ERCP-related complications.
RESULTS: In total, 12 RCTs (3450 patients) were included. The guide wire-assisted cannulation technique significantly reduced PEP compared with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique (risk ratio [RR] 0.51, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.32 - 0.82). In addition, the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique was associated with greater primary cannulation success (RR 1.07, 95 %CI 1.00 - 1.15), fewer precut sphincterotomies (RR 0.75, 95 %CI 0.60 - 0.95), and no increase in other ERCP-related complications. Subgroup analyses indicated that this significant risk reduction in PEP with the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique existed only in "non-crossover" trials (RR 0.22, 95 %CI 0.12 - 0.42). The results were robust in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique, the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique increases the primary cannulation rate and reduces the risk of PEP, and therefore appears to be the most appropriate first-line cannulation technique. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807804     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  18 in total

1.  Transpapillary Biliary Cannulation is Difficult in Cases with Large Oral Protrusion of the Duodenal Papilla.

Authors:  Masafumi Watanabe; Kosuke Okuwaki; Mitsuhiro Kida; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Hiroshi Yamauchi; Toru Kaneko; Tomohisa Iwai; Rikiya Hasegawa; Eiji Miyata; Hironori Masutani; Masayoshi Tadehara; Kai Adachi; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Difficult endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  John Baillie
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-01

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as an alternative to percutaneous drainage and surgical bypass.

Authors:  Varayu Prachayakul; Pitulak Aswakul
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-16

4.  Preventive effect of tacrolimus on patients with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Harshavardhan Rao B; Paul K Vincent; Priya Nair; Anoop K Koshy; Rama P Venu
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-08-02

5.  Impact of guidewire caliber on ERCP outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 0.025- and 0.035-inch guidewires.

Authors:  Muhammad Aziz; Amna Iqbal; Zohaib Ahmed; Saad Saleem; Wade Lee-Smith; Hemant Goyal; Faisal Kamal; Yaseen Alastal; Ali Nawras; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-07-15

6.  The comparison of two different 5.5 fr sphincterotomes for selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Ersan Ozaslan; Tugrul Purnak; Cumali Efe; Nihal Gokbulut Ozaslan; Mustafa Cengiz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Update 2016.

Authors:  Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09

8.  Controversies in ERCP: Indications and preparation.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Noor L Bekkali; Sean Burmeister; Yi Dong; Simon M Everett; Michael Hocke; Andre Ignee; Wei On; Srisha Hebbar; Kofi Oppong; Siyu Sun; Christian Jenssen; Barbara Braden
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.275

Review 9.  Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Adarsh M Thaker; Jeffrey D Mosko; Tyler M Berzin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-11-17

Review 10.  Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A narrative review.

Authors:  Igor Braga Ribeiro; Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior; Antonio Afonso Miranda Neto; Igor Mendonça Proença; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata; Edson Ide; Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos; Gustavo de Oliveira Luz; Sergio Eiji Matuguma; Spencer Cheng; Renato Baracat; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.