Literature DB >> 24513806

A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin and sublingual nitrates to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Rasoul Sotoudehmanesh1, Mohamad Ali Eloubeidi2, Ali Ali Asgari1, Maryam Farsinejad1, Morteza Khatibian1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Acute pancreatitis is the most common adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Recent data suggest that indomethacin can reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk individuals. However, whether the combination of indomethacin and sublingual nitrates is superior to indomethacin alone is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rectally administered indomethacin plus sublingual nitrate compared with indomethacin alone to prevent PEP.
METHODS: During a 17-month period, all eligible patients who underwent ERCP were enrolled in this study. We excluded patients who had undergone a prior endoscopic sphincterotomy. In a double-blind controlled randomized trial, patients received a suppository containing 100 mg of indomethacin, plus 5 mg of sublingual nitrate (group A), or a suppository containing 100 mg of indomethacin, plus sublingual placebo (group B), before ERCP. Serum amylase levels and clinically pertinent evaluations were measured in all patients after ERCP.
RESULTS: Of the 300 enrolled patients, 150 received indomethacin plus nitrate. Thirty-three patients developed pancreatitis: 10 (6.7%) in group A and 23 (15.3%) in group B (P=0.016, risk ratio=0.39, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.18-0.86). More than 80% of the patients were at high risk of developing pancreatitis after ERCP. Absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction, and number needed to treat for the prevention of PEP were 8.6% (95% CI: 4.7-14.5), 56.2% (95% CI: 50.6-60.8), and 12 (95% CI: 7-22), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Combination of rectal indomethacin and sublingual nitrate given before ERCP was significantly more likely to reduce the incidence of PEP than indomethacin suppository alone. Multicenter trials to confirm these promising findings are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24513806     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  18 in total

1.  Transpapillary Biliary Cannulation is Difficult in Cases with Large Oral Protrusion of the Duodenal Papilla.

Authors:  Masafumi Watanabe; Kosuke Okuwaki; Mitsuhiro Kida; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Hiroshi Yamauchi; Toru Kaneko; Tomohisa Iwai; Rikiya Hasegawa; Eiji Miyata; Hironori Masutani; Masayoshi Tadehara; Kai Adachi; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: what can be done?

Authors:  Goran Hauser; Marko Milosevic; Davor Stimac; Enver Zerem; Predrag Jovanović; Ivana Blazevic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Use of Prophylactic Pancreatic Stents for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-06

4.  Diclofenac Does Not Reduce the Risk of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Low-Risk Units.

Authors:  Mia Rainio; Outi Lindström; Marianne Udd; Johanna Louhimo; Leena Kylänpää
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Efficacy of Combined Management with Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Prevention of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Du; Yongxuan Zhang; Xiaozhou Yang; Lingkai Zhang; Wencong Yuan; Haining Fan; Li Ren
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Update on the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Jaehoon Cho; James Buxbaum
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

7.  Diclofenac sodium versus ceftazidime for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Goran Hauser; Ivana Blažević; Nermin Salkić; Goran Poropat; Vanja Giljača; Zlatko Bulić; Davor Štimac
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Controversies in ERCP: Indications and preparation.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Noor L Bekkali; Sean Burmeister; Yi Dong; Simon M Everett; Michael Hocke; Andre Ignee; Wei On; Srisha Hebbar; Kofi Oppong; Siyu Sun; Christian Jenssen; Barbara Braden
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.275

Review 9.  Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Adarsh M Thaker; Jeffrey D Mosko; Tyler M Berzin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-11-17

Review 10.  Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A narrative review.

Authors:  Igor Braga Ribeiro; Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior; Antonio Afonso Miranda Neto; Igor Mendonça Proença; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata; Edson Ide; Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos; Gustavo de Oliveira Luz; Sergio Eiji Matuguma; Spencer Cheng; Renato Baracat; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.