Literature DB >> 3074570

Screening for cancer.

A B Miller.   

Abstract

Screening has proved effective for only two cancer sites, the breast and the cervix uteri. Only for these, therefore, should screening be a part of routine clinical practice. The degree to which screening is effective depends on whether appropriate groups are screened. For cancer of the breast, current evidence justifies mammographic screening every two years only from the age of 50, continuing at least to the age of 70. The place of breast self-examination and physical examination of the breasts is under investigation, but these procedures should probably be used in all women after the age of 40. For cancer of the cervix, nearly maximal efficacy is obtained by screening sexually active women every three years from the age of 25 to 60. Older women who have not been screened regularly should be screened. Other screening techniques to detect cancers, such as the rectal examination, sigmoidoscopy, and fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer, are still experimental. Organizational and other difficulties will prevent screening programs from making a major contribution to reducing overall cancer mortality by the year 2000. If organizational problems can be overcome, however, screening may control invasive cancer of the cervix and make a major contribution in reducing breast cancer mortality in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3074570      PMCID: PMC1026623     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  19 in total

1.  A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy).

Authors:  D Palli; M R Del Turco; E Buiatti; S Carli; S Ciatto; L Toscani; G Maltoni
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Screening for cancer: issues and future directions.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

3.  UICC workshop of the Project on Evaluation of Screening Programmes for Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; N E Day; M Hakama; A B Miller; P C Prorok
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Screening for breast cancer: workshop report.

Authors:  N E Day; J Chamberlain
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-01

5.  Change in American Cancer Society Checkup Guidelines for detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  D J Fink
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Cancer statistics, 1988.

Authors:  E Silverberg; J A Lubera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

Authors:  H Seidman; S K Gelb; E Silverberg; N LaVerda; J A Lubera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Multiphasic Health Checkup Evaluation: a 16-year follow-up.

Authors:  G D Friedman; M F Collen; B H Fireman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

9.  The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.

Authors:  D M Eddy; V Hasselblad; W McGivney; W Hendee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for low-income elderly women.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; M C Fahs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.