Literature DB >> 3127608

The cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for low-income elderly women.

J S Mandelblatt1, M C Fahs.   

Abstract

Controversy surrounds prevention policy for the elderly. While some cost-effectiveness analyses have been done for the general elderly population, to our knowledge no study has examined the provision of preventive services to a low-income elderly population. We conducted a study of the cost-effectiveness of a cervical cancer screening program for infrequently screened elderly women attending an urban municipal hospital clinic. The results of Papanicolaou testing were abnormal (malignant or premalignant) in 11 of 816 women screened. This early detection of cervical neoplasia saved +5907 and 3.7 years of life per 100 Papanicolaou tests. When average medical costs per year of life extended by screening were included, the program cost +2874 per year of life saved. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses performed on competing medical and economic points of view did not change the conclusion of a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio for screening. Our findings indicate that the benefits from some prevention programs for the elderly can offset the costs of these programs. More research is needed to guide public policy on prevention for selected population groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3127608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  11 in total

1.  Cancer screening in older adults.

Authors:  J M Walsh
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-05

2.  Marginally effective medical care: ethical analysis of issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

Authors:  M Hilberman; J Kutner; D Parsons; D J Murphy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The knowledge base for public health strategies.

Authors:  L B Russell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Patterns of cervical carcinoma in women of advanced age.

Authors:  G W Chapman
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 5.  Screening for cancer.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

Review 6.  Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.

Authors:  M C Fahs; S B Plichta; J S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  R Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-25

8.  Revisiting the effect of the Pap test on cervical cancer.

Authors:  N D Holmquist
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Cancer outlook: an African perspective.

Authors:  A R Walker
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women. The Harlem Study Team.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; M Traxler; P Lakin; L Thomas; P Chauhan; S Matseoane; P Kanetsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.