Literature DB >> 3115506

Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

H Seidman1, S K Gelb, E Silverberg, N LaVerda, J A Lubera.   

Abstract

Very high survival rates have been observed in four through 11 years of follow-up in 4,240 women with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP). The relative five, eight, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 83, and 79 percent, respectively. Allowances were made for lead-time bias among cancers detected through screening, and the validity of the findings was supported by internal analyses, which showed that length-time bias was of little, if any, importance, and that any possible "overdiagnosis" of cancer cases was also of small relevance. In view of current interest in the value of screening women before age 50, intensive analyses were made comparing the BCDDP data for women in their 40s with women in their 50s. In terms of kinds of breast cancers found, modality of finding them, and survival rates once they have been found, the parallel results for the two groups show that screening was virtually as effective in the younger as in the older women. Some authorities are of the opinion that the benefits of mammography after age 50 are well documented, but at younger ages the evidence is still inconclusive. The findings in this study show there is no doubt of the very successful results of screening for breast cancer with mammography in younger as well as older women. In comparing relative five-year and eight-year survival rates for women with invasive breast cancers detected through screening in the BCDDP, with those for cases diagnosed in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (NCI SEER) program from 1977 to 1982, it is seen that for individual subcategories by tumor size and nodal class, the survival rates are about the same. However, for overall invasive cancers, the five-year and eight-year survival rates were 87 and 81 percent, respectively, for the BCDDP compared with 74 and 65 percent for SEER. Thus the substantial gains in survival followed the large shift toward a high proportion of cancers being diagnosed and treated in more favorable stages through the screening accomplishments. With respect to the relative case fatality rates, the complements of the relative survival rates, the eight-year rate of 19 percent for the BCDDP versus that of 35 percent for SEER connotes 46 percent fewer women dying in the BCDDP group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3115506     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.37.5.258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  30 in total

1.  Urban black women's perceptions of breast cancer and mammography.

Authors:  J H Price; S M Desmond; S Slenker; D Smith; P W Stewart
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1992-08

Review 2.  Mode of detection and secular time for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

3.  Nonpalpable invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Wilhelm; S B Edge; D D Cole; E deParedes; H F Frierson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: public health implications.

Authors:  T A Farley; J T Flannery
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Management of locally advanced breast cancer-perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Elzbieta Senkus; Maria J Cardoso; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Reducing deaths from breast cancer in Canada.

Authors:  I S Simor; R A Jong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Mammography-the state of the art.

Authors:  M Ray; P G Brooks
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-03

Review 8.  Screening for cancer.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

Review 9.  Management of in situ and minimally invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  E R Frykberg; K I Bland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference?

Authors:  C S Skinner; V J Strecher; H Hospers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.