Literature DB >> 3711252

Multiphasic Health Checkup Evaluation: a 16-year follow-up.

G D Friedman, M F Collen, B H Fireman.   

Abstract

The Multiphasic Health Checkup Evaluation Study, a long-term clinical trial, has been completed. A study group of 5156 men and women age 35-54 at entry was urged to have annual multiphasic health checkups (MHCs) for 16 years. A control group of 5557 comparable subjects was not so urged but was followed up in a comparable fashion. The mean and median number of MHCs per person were 6.8 and 6, respectively, in the study group and 2.8 and 1, respectively, in the control group. During 16 years the study group experienced a 30% reduction (p less than 0.05) in deaths from pre-specified "potentially postponable" causes, largely associated with lower death rates from colorectal cancer and hypertension. This reduction was most pronounced in the early years of the study. The two groups did not differ to a statistically significant degree in mortality from all other causes (84% of total mortality) or in total mortality. There was no difference in self-reported disability in the overall groups. In the setting of our prepaid health care plan where MHCs were already available on a voluntary basis, a program of urging middle-aged persons to undergo regular MHCs brought about a substantial reduction in mortality from preselected diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3711252     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90112-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  42 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Staging of colorectal cancer. Official recommendations of the Canadian Study Group on Preventive Medicine].

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian task force on preventive health care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Colorectal cancer: have we identified an effective screening strategy?

Authors:  G D Friedman; J V Selby
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Role of research in development of organisation and structure of general practice.

Authors:  D C Morrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-01

7.  Use of care and subsequent mortality: the importance of gender.

Authors:  P Franks; M R Gold; C M Clancy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Registration health checks: inverse care in the inner city?

Authors:  C Griffiths; S Cooke; P Toon
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.