Literature DB >> 20059714

Implantation trends and patient profiles for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the United States: 1993-2006.

Steven M Kurtz1, Jorge A Ochoa, Edmund Lau, Yakov Shkolnikov, Behzad B Pavri, Daniel Frisch, Arnold J Greenspon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies of cardiac rhythm management devices (pacemakers [PM] and implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICD]) utilization in the United States have been limited to the Medicare population. We evaluated the national trends for the implantation of PMs and ICDs including the burden of device replacement.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried to identify PM and ICD patients between 1993 and 2006 using ICD-9-CM codes, including demographics, health profile, and economic data. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and replacement burden were calculated, and changes over time studied.
RESULTS: From 1993 to 2006, 2.4 million patients received a primary PM and 0.8 million received an ICD, while there were 369,000 PM replacements and 74,000 ICD replacements. Women comprised 49% of PM and 24% of ICD patients. The mean ICD replacement burden was 8.4% (range 5-22%) and decreased significantly over time (P < 0.0001) while the replacement burden for PMs was constant (mean = 13.4%, range 11-16%). ICD patients had more comorbidities than PM patients (CCI: 0.8 vs 1.1, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The replacement burden for PMs has remained constant, while the replacement burden for ICDs has decreased. This is likely due to the stability of the patient population receiving PMs and technology maturity. Alternatively, the indications for ICD implantation have broadened, resulting in an increased number of primary ICD implantations. The age and comorbidities are increasing in those patients receiving ICDs while the PM population is stable. These data suggest that monitoring of replacement burden is warranted, given the changing populations, their disparate clinical outcomes, and economic implications to the health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20059714     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02670.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  46 in total

1.  Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Yves T Wang; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  Approval of high-risk medical devices in the US: implications for clinical cardiology.

Authors:  Benjamin N Rome; Daniel B Kramer; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.

Authors:  Khaldoun G Tarakji; Christopher R Ellis; Pascal Defaye; Charles Kennergren
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

4.  Feasibility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Wideband Protocol in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Its Utility for Defining Scar.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Keigo Kawaji; Neha Goyal; Noreen T Nazir; Andrew Beaser; Virginia O'Keefe-Baker; Karima Addetia; Roderick Tung; Peng Hu; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  The characteristics and outcome of infective endocarditis involving implantable cardiac devices.

Authors:  Eugene Athan
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  The use of advance directives among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Tanya H Tajouri; Abigale L Ottenberg; David L Hayes; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  The prevalence and contents of advance directives in patients with pacemakers.

Authors:  Dario Pasalic; Tanya H Tajouri; Abigale L Ottenberg; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Use of an antibacterial envelope is associated with reduced cardiac implantable electronic device infections in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kolek; William F Dresen; Quinn S Wells; Christopher R Ellis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Assessment of the Safety Risk of Dermatoscope Magnets in Patients With Cardiovascular Implanted Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Ayelet Rishpon; Ralph Braun; Martin A Weinstock; Stephen Kulju; Andrea Grenga; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Nadeem G Marghoob; Jan Steffel; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 10.  The pathway to physician reimbursement for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): a history and brief synopsis.

Authors:  Attila Roka; Mark H Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.