Literature DB >> 21641356

Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverters/defibrillators at 1.5 T.

Claas P Naehle1, Jens Kreuz, Katharina Strach, Jörg Otto Schwab, Simon Pingel, Roger Luechinger, Rolf Fimmers, Hans Schild, Daniel Thomas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain and spine may safely be performed in patients with pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs), when taking adequate precautions. The aim of this study was to investigate safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value (DV) of MR imaging in cardiac applications (cardiac MR [CMR]) in patients with PMs and ICDs for the first time.
METHODS: Thirty-two PM/ICD patients with a clinical need for CMR were examined. The specific absorption rate was limited to 1.5 W/kg. Devices were reprogrammed pre-CMR to minimize interference with the electromagnetic fields. Devices were interrogated pre-CMR and post-CMR and after 3 months. Troponin I levels were measured pre-CMR and post-CMR; image quality (IQ) and DV of CMR were assessed.
RESULTS: All devices could be reprogrammed normally post-CMR. No significant changes of pacing capture threshold, lead impedance, and troponin I were observed. Image quality in patients with right-sided devices (RSD) was better compared with that in patients with left-sided devices (LSD) (P < .05), and less myocardial segments were affected by device-related artefacts (P < .05). Diagnostic value was rated as sufficiently high, allowing for diagnosis, or better in 12 (100%) of 12 patients with RSD, and only in 7 (35%) of 20 patients with LSD.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac MR may be performed safely when limiting specific absorption rate, appropriately monitoring patients, and following device reprogramming. Cardiac MR delivers good IQ and DV in patients with RSD. Cardiac MR in patients with RSD may therefore be performed with an acceptable risk/benefit ratio, whereas the risk/benefit ratio is rather unfavorable in patients with LSD.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21641356     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  24 in total

1.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study.

Authors:  Mrinal Yadava; Matthew Nugent; Angela Krebsbach; Jessica Minnier; Peter Jessel; Charles A Henrikson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 T: influence of pacemaker related artifacts on image quality including first pass perfusion, aortic and mitral valve assessment, flow measurement, short tau inversion recovery and T1-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Oliver Klein-Wiele; Marietta Garmer; Martin Busch; Serban Mateiescu; Rhyan Urbien; Gianluca Barbone; Kaffer Kara; Michael Schulte-Hermes; Frauke Metz; Birgit Hailer; Dietrich Grönemeyer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Two further aspects.

Authors:  Claas P Nähle; Roger Lüchinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Repeated MRI of a patient with an intramedullary tumour and implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D).

Authors:  C Brockmann; T Sommer; R Pirzer; H U Kerl; I S Nolte; A Förster; M A Brockmann
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Is cardiac CT a reproducible alternative for cardiac MR in adult patients with a systemic right ventricle?

Authors:  M M Winter; S Romeih; B J Bouma; M Groenink; N A Blom; A M Spijkerboer; B J M Mulder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  John V Higgins; Robert E Watson; Allan S Jaffe; Connie Dalzell; Nancy Acker; Joel P Felmlee; Samuel J Asirvatham; Yong-Mei Cha; Paul A Friedman; Suraj Kapa
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Feasibility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Wideband Protocol in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Its Utility for Defining Scar.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Keigo Kawaji; Neha Goyal; Noreen T Nazir; Andrew Beaser; Virginia O'Keefe-Baker; Karima Addetia; Roderick Tung; Peng Hu; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  The era of modern medicine: implants and all.

Authors:  Kaushik Guha; Rakesh Sharma
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-13

10.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography for detection of concomitant coronary disease in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Xiaohai Ma; Hailong Ge; Chen Zhang; Zhanhong Wang; Kunihiko Teraoka; Zhanming Fan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.