| Literature DB >> 30739333 |
Hanxiao Jiang1, Andrew A Horwitz1, Chapman Wright2, Anna Tai1, Elizabeth A Znameroski1, Yoseph Tsegaye1, Hailley Warbington1, Benjamin S Bower1, Christina Alves2, Carl Co2, Kanvasri Jonnalagadda2, Darren Platt1, Jessica M Walter1, Venkatesh Natarajan2, Jeffrey A Ubersax1, Joel R Cherry1, J Christopher Love2.
Abstract
For commercial protein therapeutics, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells have an established history of safety, proven capability to express a wide range of therapeutic proteins and high volumetric productivities. Expanding global markets for therapeutic proteins and increasing concerns for broadened access of these medicines has catalyzed consideration of alternative approaches to this platform. Reaching these objectives likely will require an order of magnitude increase in volumetric productivity and a corresponding reduction in the costs of manufacture. For CHO-based manufacturing, achieving this combination of targeted improvements presents challenges. Based on a holistic analysis, the choice of host cells was identified as the single most influential factor for both increasing productivity and decreasing costs. Here we evaluated eight wild-type eukaryotic micro-organisms with prior histories of recombinant protein expression. The evaluation focused on assessing the potential of each host, and their corresponding phyla, with respect to key attributes relevant for manufacturing, namely (a) growth rates in industry-relevant media, (b) adaptability to modern techniques for genome editing, and (c) initial characterization of product quality. These characterizations showed that multiple organisms may be suitable for production with appropriate engineering and development and highlighted that yeast in general present advantages for rapid genome engineering and development cycles.Entities:
Keywords: alternate expression systems; antibody; genome engineering; recombinant protein expression; yeast expression systems
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30739333 PMCID: PMC6836876 DOI: 10.1002/bit.26951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng ISSN: 0006-3592 Impact factor: 4.530
Overview of eight selected hosts. Growth rates of all four yeast strains, Leishmania tarentolae, and Pichia tricornutum were measured in each host's regular growth media as described in Section 2.
| Class | Species | Strain name | Genome (Mb) (References) | Number of chromosomes | Average growth rate (hr−1) (References) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeast |
| NRRL Y‐48124 | 9.4 (Love et al., | 4 | 0.40 |
|
| NRRL Y‐7571 | 10.9 (Jeong et al., | 8 | 0.57 | |
|
| NRRL Y‐7560 | 9.1 (Ravin et al., | 7 | 0.38 | |
|
| NRRL Y‐17692 | 11.8 (Kunze et al., | 4 | 0.40 | |
| Filamentous fungi |
| NRRL 15709 | 34.9 (Li et al., | 7 | 0.202 (Tholudur, Ramirez, & McMillan, |
|
| NRRL 694 | 37 (Machida et al., | 8 | 0.27 (Carlsen, Spohr, Nielsen, & Villadsen, | |
| Other |
| JENA T7‐TR | 32.8 (Kazemi, | 36 | 0.074 |
|
| UTEX 646 | 27.5 (Bowler et al., | 34 | 0.013 | |
| Mammalian | CHO‐K1 | 2450 (X. Xu et al., | 21 | 0.035 |
Key characteristics of selected hosts important in genetic engineering.
| Host | Doubling time (hr) | Efficiency of single change (%) | Multiplex changes (max number/efficiency) | Cycling time in weeks (confirmed change is made) | Number of genes changed per month | Time for HC/LC integration to bank made (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2 | >90 | 5 (30%) | 2 | 10 | 1–2 |
|
| 1.2 | 8–92 | 2 (12%) | 2 | 4 | 1–2 |
|
| 2 | >80 | 3 (10–60%) | 2 | 6 | 1–2 |
|
| 2 | 50–100 | 3 (17%) | 2 | 6 | 1–2 |
|
| 3.5 | 1–30 | NA | 10 | 0.4 | 4 |
|
| 2.5 | 1–30 | NA | 10 | 0.4 | 4 |
|
| 19–25 | <1 | 2 (<1%) | 14–16 | 0.5 | 6 |
Note. L. tarentolae was not included, since this was plasmid‐based transformation; while no expression could be achieved for P. tricornutum.
Time to introduce and confirm change plus expansion of confirmed culture to banking.
Without NHEJ deletion.
The efficiency will depend on transfection method and selection system.
Figure 1Western blot analysis for anti‐CD20 (a–c) and Herceptin (d–f) produced from seven microbial hosts. (a and d) Nonreduced gels on ProA purified samples. (b and e) Reduced gels on ProA purified samples. (c and f) Reduced gels for ProA purified and Endo H‐treated samples. Please note that different dilutions were made to these samples based on final concentrations of the antibodies purified from these hosts. AA, Arxula adeninivorans, Y412aa and Y858; AO, Aspergillus oryzae, Y960 and Y976; CTL, antibody produced from CHO cells; HP, Hansenula polymorpha, Y138 and Y023; KM, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Y350 and Y486km; LT, Leishmania tarentolae, Y396 and Y935; MW, molecular weight ladder; PP, Pichia pastoris, Y242 and Y324; TR, Trichoderma reesei, Y385
Figure 2Configurations of antibody expression cassettes in Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus oryzae. (a) HC and LC are linked by a 2A linker. (b, left) T. reesei CBH1 catalytic core linked to codon‐optimized HC and LC. A kexin protease cleavage site is added to the end of the coding sequence of the CBH1 linker sequence to facilitate cleavage of the fused proteins during secretion. (b, right) A. oryzae GlaA catalytic core linked to codon‐optimized HC and LC. A kexin protease cleavage site is added to the end of the coding sequence of the GlaA to facilitate cleavage of the fused proteins during secretion. CBHI: cellobiohydrolase 1; GlaA: glucoamylase A; HC, heavy chain; LC, light chain
Figure 3N‐glycan analysis of Herceptin producing in various strains—CHO (a), Pichia pastoris (b), Kluyveromyces marxianus (c), and Leishmania tarentolae (d). CHO, Chinese hamster ovary [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]