| Literature DB >> 31654411 |
Joseph R Brady1,2, Charles A Whittaker1, Melody C Tan1, D Lee Kristensen1, Duanduan Ma1, Neil C Dalvie1,2, Kerry Routenberg Love1, J Christopher Love1,2.
Abstract
Komagataella phaffii, also known as Pichia pastoris, is a common host for the production of biologics and enzymes, due to fast growth, high productivity, and advancements in host engineering. Several K. phaffii variants are commonly used as interchangeable base strains, which confounds efforts to improve this host. In this study, genomic and transcriptomic analyses of Y-11430 (CBS7435), GS115, X-33, and eight other variants enabled a comparative assessment of the relative fitness of these hosts for recombinant protein expression. Cell wall integrity explained the majority of the variation among strains, impacting transformation efficiency, growth, methanol metabolism, and secretion of heterologous proteins. Y-11430 exhibited the highest activity of genes involved in methanol utilization, up to two-fold higher transcription of heterologous genes, and robust growth. With a more permeable cell wall, X-33 displayed a six-fold higher transformation efficiency and up to 1.2-fold higher titers than Y-11430. X-33 also shared nearly all mutations, and a defective variant of HIS4, with GS115, precluding robust growth. Transferring two beneficial mutations identified in X-33 into Y-11430 resulted in an optimized base strain that provided up to four-fold higher transformation efficiency and three-fold higher protein titers, while retaining robust growth. The approach employed here to assess unique banked variants in a species and then transfer key beneficial variants into a base strain should also facilitate rational assessment of a broad set of other recombinant hosts.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-Seq; heterologous gene expression; recombinant protein; yeast
Year: 2019 PMID: 31654411 PMCID: PMC7003935 DOI: 10.1002/bit.27209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng ISSN: 0006-3592 Impact factor: 4.530
Identifying and source information for each strain characterized
| Strain ID | Alternate ID | Source | Isolation information |
|---|---|---|---|
| Y‐11430 | CBS 7435 | USDA‐NRRL | Black oak, California |
| Y‐7556 | CBS 2612 | USDA‐NRRL | Black oak, California |
| YB‐4290 | CBS 2612 | USDA‐NRRL | Black oak, California |
| Y‐12729 | USDA‐NRRL | Unknown, Mexico | |
| Y‐48123 | USDA‐NRRL | Unknown | |
| GS115 | Life TechnologiesTM | MNG mutant of Y‐11430 | |
| X‐33 | Life TechnologiesTM | Revertant of GS115 | |
| Y‐48124 | X‐33 | USDA‐NRRL | Revertant of GS115 |
| YB‐4289 | USDA‐NRRL | Black oak, California | |
| YB‐378 | USDA‐NRRL | Elm | |
| Y‐17741 | USDA‐NRRL | Emory oak, Arizona |
Abbreviations: MNG, methylnitronitrosoguanidine; USDA‐NRRL, United States Department of Agricultural‐Northern Regional Research Laboratory
Figure 1Genotypic comparison among wild‐type and biotechnological Komagataella phaffii strains. (a) Phylogeny and single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) count of K. phaffii strains sequenced in this study. SNP counts are shown on a logarithmic scale. The presence of either killer plasmid present in Y‐11430 is noted where applicable. (b) SNPs that differ between one or more members of the GS115 family (Group 2) strains. Gray and blue fill indicate the presence of nonfunctional and functional SNPs, respectively. The resultant missense is noted where applicable. (c) Distribution of SNPs across chromosomal positions for the three most variant strains (>16,000 SNPs, Group 3) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2Whole transcriptome comparison of strains during different conditions of fermentation and expression of methanol utilization (Mut) pathway genes. (a) Correlation matrices for all expressed genes under each condition, with hierarchical clustering by Ward's method. (b) Depiction of the Mut pathway in K. phaffii, adapted from Küberl et al. (2011). Major intermediates are colored in black. Expression of Mut genes is illustrated for four strains representative of four different observed phenotypes; arrows for each pathway step are colored by the expression level of the appropriate enzyme(s) as determined by RNA‐Seq. Color scale indicates the relative expression of each gene across strains. When two genes contribute to a pathway step, the lower‐numbered gene is colored as the major stripe (e.g., AOX1 is light green in Y‐11430) and the higher‐numbered gene is colored as the minor stripe (e.g., AOX2 dark blue in Y‐11430) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3Phenotypic analysis of mutations affecting growth, cell wall composition, and DNA repair in select strains. (a) Plating of serial dilutions of strains on YPD and YPD supplemented with either Congo red or Calcofluor white dye. (b) Transformation efficiency of select strains relative to Y‐11430 for each of two input amounts of linearized plasmid DNA. Error bars represent standard deviation of six replicates. Significance was calculated using a one‐sample Student's t test relative to baseline =1. (c) Growth curves for each biotechnological strain in synthetic complete medium with histidine (SC) or without histidine (SC‐his). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Significance was calculated using an extra sum‐of‐squares F test on nonlinear regressions for each culture. Regressions were created using a least‐squares fit to the Gompertz growth equation. *p ≤ .05; **p ≤ .01; ***p ≤ .001; ****p ≤ .0001; n.s., not significant [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4Productivity of strains expressing a hormone (rhGH), cytokine (rhG‐CSF), or monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab). (a) Secreted protein titer (relative to highest‐secreting Y‐11430 strain) versus transgene messenger RNA expression for K. phaffii strains. Titers from GS115 strains were negligible relative to Y‐11430 (noted with an “X”). Linear fit between protein titer and transgene expression is depicted. (b) Relative titer for biotechnological and engineered strains expressing rhGH, rhG‐CSF, or trastuzumab. Titer shown relative to the highest producing Y‐11430 clone, as indicated by the dashed line. The copy number of each strain is indicated. (c) Transformation efficiency of Y‐11430 RCR2D196E RVB1K8E relative to Y‐11430 for each of two input amounts of various linearized plasmids. Error bars represent standard deviation of four and six replicates for 5 and 1‐µg inputs, respectively. Significance was calculated using a one‐sample Student's t test relative to baseline =1. *p ≤ .05; ***p ≤ .001 [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]