Literature DB >> 30737308

Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.

Yumiko Umino1, Ying Guo1, Ching-Kang Chen2, Rose Pasquale1, Eduardo Solessio3.   

Abstract

The mammalian visual system operates over an extended range of ambient light levels by switching between rod and cone photoreceptors. Rod-driven vision is sluggish, highly sensitive, and operates in dim or scotopic lights, whereas cone-driven vision is brisk, less sensitive, and operates in bright or photopic lights. At intermediate or mesopic lights, vision transitions seamlessly from rod-driven to cone-driven, despite the profound differences in rod and cone response dynamics. The neural mechanisms underlying such a smooth handoff are not understood. Using an operant behavior assay, electrophysiological recordings, and mathematical modeling we examined the neural underpinnings of the mesopic visual transition in mice of either sex. We found that rods, but not cones, drive visual sensitivity to temporal light variations over much of the mesopic range. Surprisingly, speeding up rod photoresponse recovery kinetics in transgenic mice improved visual sensitivity to slow temporal variations, in the range where perceptual sensitivity is governed by Weber's law of sensation. In contrast, physiological processes acting downstream from phototransduction limit sensitivity to high frequencies and temporal resolution. We traced the paradoxical control of visual temporal sensitivity to rod photoresponses themselves. A scenario emerges where perceptual sensitivity is limited by: (1) the kinetics of neural processes acting downstream from phototransduction in scotopic lights, (2) rod response kinetics in mesopic lights, and (3) cone response kinetics as light levels rise into the photopic range.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our ability to detect flickering lights is constrained by the dynamics of the slowest step in the visual pathway. Cone photoresponse kinetics limit visual temporal sensitivity in bright (photopic) lights, whereas mechanisms in the inner retina limit sensitivity in dim (scotopic) lights. The neural mechanisms underlying the transition between scotopic and photopic vision in mesopic lights, when both rods are cones are active, are unknown. This study provides a missing link in this mechanism by establishing that rod photoresponse kinetics limit temporal sensitivity during the mesopic transition. Surprisingly, this range is where Weber's Law of Sensation governs temporal contrast sensitivity in mouse. Our results will help guide future studies of complex and dynamic interactions between rod-cone signals in the mesopic retina.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERG; Weber adaptation; mesopic vision; mouse; operant behavior; temporal resolution

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30737308      PMCID: PMC6468098          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1404-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  88 in total

1.  Computational analysis of vertebrate phototransduction: combined quantitative and qualitative modeling of dark- and light-adapted responses in amphibian rods.

Authors:  R D Hamer
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Why use noise?

Authors:  D G Pelli; B Farell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Temporal contrast adaptation in salamander bipolar cells.

Authors:  F Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Primate horizontal cell dynamics: an analysis of sensitivity regulation in the outer retina.

Authors:  V C Smith; J Pokorny; B B Lee; D M Dacey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effects of temporal noise and retinal illuminance on foveal flicker sensitivity.

Authors:  J Rovamo; A Raninen; K Donner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The role of steady phosphodiesterase activity in the kinetics and sensitivity of the light-adapted salamander rod photoresponse.

Authors:  S Nikonov; T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods.

Authors:  Peter D Calvert; Victor I Govardovskii; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Clint L Makino
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Primate photopic sine-wave flicker ERG: vector modeling analysis of component origins using glutamate analogs.

Authors:  M Kondo; P A Sieving
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Temporal properties of the mouse cone electroretinogram.

Authors:  Vivek R Krishna; Kenneth R Alexander; Neal S Peachey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Rod pathways: the importance of seeing nothing.

Authors:  L T Sharpe; A Stockman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rod Photoreceptors Signal Fast Changes in Daylight Levels Using a Cx36-Independent Retinal Pathway in Mouse.

Authors:  Rose Pasquale; Yumiko Umino; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Differential impact of Kv8.2 loss on rod and cone signaling and degeneration.

Authors:  Shivangi M Inamdar; Colten K Lankford; Deepak Poria; Joseph G Laird; Eduardo Solessio; Vladimir J Kefalov; Sheila A Baker
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.121

3.  Cone-Driven Retinal Responses Are Shaped by Rod But Not Cone HCN1.

Authors:  Colten K Lankford; Yumiko Umino; Deepak Poria; Vladimir Kefalov; Eduardo Solessio; Sheila A Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Effect of ambient lighting on frequency dependence in transcranial electrical stimulation-induced phosphenes.

Authors:  Ian Evans; Stephen Palmisano; Rodney J Croft
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Phenotype Characterization of a Mice Genetic Model of Absolute Blindness.

Authors:  Santiago Milla-Navarro; Mateo Pazo-González; Francisco Germain; Pedro de la Villa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 6.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.