Literature DB >> 10069051

Why use noise?

D G Pelli1, B Farell.   

Abstract

Measuring the dependence of visual sensitivity on parameters of the visual stimulus is a mainstay of vision science. However, it is not widely appreciated that visual sensitivity is a product of two factors that are each invariant with respect to many properties of the stimulus and task. By estimating these two factors, one can isolate visual processes more easily than by using sensitivity measures alone. The underlying idea is that noise limits all forms of communication, including vision. As an empirical matter, it is often useful to measure the human observer's threshold with and without a noise background added to the display, to disentangle the observer's ability from the observer's intrinsic noise. And when we know how much noise there is, it is often useful to calculate ideal performance of the task at hand, as a benchmark for human performance. This strips away the intrinsic difficulty of the task to reveal a pure measure of human ability. Here we show how to do the factoring of sensitivity into efficiency and equivalent noise, and we document the invariances of the two factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10069051     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.16.000647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  76 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Perceptual learning improves neural processing in myopic vision.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Yan; Jiawei Zhou; Wuxiao Zhao; Min Li; Jie Xi; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Dennis M Levi; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Roger W Li
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task.

Authors:  Hadley Tassinari; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Mechanisms underlying perceptual learning of contrast detection in adults with anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Zhong-Lin Lu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.