Literature DB >> 11153649

Computational analysis of vertebrate phototransduction: combined quantitative and qualitative modeling of dark- and light-adapted responses in amphibian rods.

R D Hamer1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the generality of two models of vertebrate phototransduction. The approach was to quantitatively optimize each model to the full waveform of high-quality, dark-adapted (DA), salamander rod flash responses. With the optimal parameters, each model was then used to account for signature, qualitative features of rod responses from three experimental paradigms (stimulus/response, "S/R suite"): (1) step responses; (2) the intensity dependence of the period of photocurrent saturation (Tsat vs. ln(I)); and (3) light-adapted (LA) incremental flash sensitivity as a function of background intensity. The first model was the recent successful model of Nikonov et al. (1998). The second model replaced the instantaneous Ca2+ buffering used in the Nikonov et al. model with a dynamic buffer. The results showed that, in the absence of the dynamic Ca2+ buffer, the Nikonov et al. model does not have sufficient flexibility to provide a good fit to the flash responses, and, using the same parameters, reproduce the salient features of the S/R suite--critical features at step onset and offset are absent; the Tsat function has too shallow a slope; and the model cannot generate the empirically observed I-range of Weber-Fechner LA behavior. Some features could be recovered by changing parameters, but only at the expense of the fit to the reference (Ref) data. When the dynamic buffer is added, the model is able to achieve an acceptable fit to the Ref data while reproducing several features of the S/R suite, including an empirically observed Tsat function, and an extended range of LA flash sensitivity adhering to Weber's law. The overall improved behavior of the model with a dynamic Ca2+ buffer indicates that it is an important mechanism to include in a working model of phototransduction, and that, despite the slow kinetics of amphibian rods, Ca2+ buffering should not be simulated as an instantaneous process. However, neither model was able to capture all the features with the same parameters yielding the optimal fit to the Ref data. In addition, neither model could maintain a good fit to the Ref data when five key biochemical parameters were held at their current known values. Moreover, even after optimization, a number of important parameters remained outside their empirical estimates. We conclude that other mechanisms will need to be added, including additional Ca2+-feedback mechanisms. The present research illustrates the importance of a hybrid qualitative/quantitative approach to model development, and the limitations of modeling restricted sets of data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11153649      PMCID: PMC1482460          DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800175030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  72 in total

1.  Light-induced reduction of cytoplasmic free calcium in retinal rod outer segment.

Authors:  K W Yau; K Nakatani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Feb 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Induction by cyclic GMP of cationic conductance in plasma membrane of retinal rod outer segment.

Authors:  E E Fesenko; S S Kolesnikov; A L Lyubarsky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jan 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cyclic GMP-sensitive conductance of retinal rods consists of aqueous pores.

Authors:  A L Zimmerman; D A Baylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 May 1-7       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Kinetics of the photocurrent of retinal rods.

Authors:  R D Penn; W A Hagins
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Regulation of cyclic GMP metabolism in toad photoreceptors. Definition of the metabolic events subserving photoexcited and attenuated states.

Authors:  S M Dawis; R M Graeff; R A Heyman; T F Walseth; N D Goldberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Kinetics and components of the flash photocurrent of isolated retinal rods of the larval salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum.

Authors:  W H Cobbs; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Guanylate cyclase in rod outer segments of the toad retina. Effect of light and Ca2+.

Authors:  I M Pepe; I Panfoli; C Cugnoli
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1986-07-14       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Measurement of the intracellular free calcium concentration in salamander rods.

Authors:  P A McNaughton; L Cervetto; B J Nunn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jul 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Millisecond activation of transducin in the cyclic nucleotide cascade of vision.

Authors:  T M Vuong; M Chabre; L Stryer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Oct 18-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Analysis of Ca++-dependent gain changes in PDE activation in vertebrate rod phototransduction.

Authors:  R D Hamer
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2000-12-31       Impact factor: 2.367

2.  G-protein betagamma-complex is crucial for efficient signal amplification in vision.

Authors:  Alexander V Kolesnikov; Loryn Rikimaru; Anne K Hennig; Peter D Lukasiewicz; Steven J Fliesler; Victor I Govardovskii; Vladimir J Kefalov; Oleg G Kisselev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Toward a unified model of vertebrate rod phototransduction.

Authors:  R D Hamer; S C Nicholas; D Tranchina; T D Lamb; J L P Jarvinen
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Light responses and light adaptation in rat retinal rods at different temperatures.

Authors:  S Nymark; H Heikkinen; C Haldin; K Donner; A Koskelainen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.

Authors:  Yumiko Umino; Ying Guo; Ching-Kang Chen; Rose Pasquale; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The limit of photoreceptor sensitivity: molecular mechanisms of dark noise in retinal cones.

Authors:  David Holcman; Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Kinetics of turn-offs of frog rod phototransduction cascade.

Authors:  Luba A Astakhova; Michael L Firsov; Victor I Govardovskii
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Light adaptation in salamander L-cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Frederick S Soo; Peter B Detwiler; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Speed, adaptation, and stability of the response to light in cone photoreceptors: the functional role of Ca-dependent modulation of ligand sensitivity in cGMP-gated ion channels.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.086

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.