Literature DB >> 11784728

Temporal properties of the mouse cone electroretinogram.

Vivek R Krishna1, Kenneth R Alexander, Neal S Peachey.   

Abstract

To determine the temporal response characteristics of the mouse cone electroretinogram (ERG), we recorded responses to high contrast sinusoidal stimuli ranging from 2 to 52 Hz. The largest response amplitudes obtained from wild-type (WT) mice occurred at stimulus frequencies below 10 Hz, and cone ERG amplitude declined progressively with increasing stimulus frequency above that level. In comparison, human responses recorded under the same stimulus and recording conditions displayed maximal responses to stimulus frequencies near 4 and 40 Hz, and a pronounced dip at 12 Hz. Responses were also obtained from nob (no b-wave) mice, which lack ERG contributions from depolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs). At low temporal frequencies, nob cone ERGs were smaller than those of WT mice and had a different waveform. As temporal frequency increased, nob and WT responses became more similar and came into register at the highest temporal frequencies. To evaluate the contribution of the DBC pathway to the mouse cone ERG, nob responses were vector-subtracted from those of WT mice. The derived DBC response was maximal at low stimulus frequencies and fell sharply as stimulus frequency increased. These results indicate that the mouse cone ERG is more linear than the primate response and that the temporal response of the mouse outer retina is tuned to much lower frequencies than that of primate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11784728     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00489.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  36 in total

1.  Modulation of rod photoreceptor output by HCN1 channels is essential for regular mesopic cone vision.

Authors:  Mathias W Seeliger; Arne Brombas; Reto Weiler; Peter Humphries; Gabriel Knop; Naoyuki Tanimoto; Frank Müller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Light-driven calcium signals in mouse cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Tao Wei; Timm Schubert; François Paquet-Durand; Naoyuki Tanimoto; Le Chang; Katja Koeppen; Thomas Ott; Oliver Griesbeck; Mathias W Seeliger; Thomas Euler; Bernd Wissinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Recommendations for a toxicological screening ERG procedure in laboratory animals.

Authors:  Serge G Rosolen; Florence Rigaudière; Jean-François Le Gargasson; Mitchell G Brigell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Flicker assessment of rod and cone function in a model of retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Glen R Rubin; Timothy W Kraft
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Harmonic analysis of the cone flicker ERG of rabbit.

Authors:  Haohua Qian; Kenneth R Alexander; Harris Ripps
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Is there an omitted stimulus response in the human cone flicker electroretinogram?

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Two distinct processes are evident in rat cone flicker ERG responses at low and high temporal frequencies.

Authors:  Haohua Qian; Manthan R Shah; Kenneth R Alexander; Harris Ripps
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Spectral and temporal sensitivity of cone-mediated responses in mouse retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Yanbin V Wang; Michael Weick; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Temporal properties of the lens eyes of the box jellyfish Tripedalia cystophora.

Authors:  Megan O'Connor; Dan-E Nilsson; Anders Garm
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Electrophysiological deficits in the retina of the DBA/2J mouse.

Authors:  Joanna Harazny; Michael Scholz; Thomas Buder; Berthold Lausen; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.